The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 10 ( 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of Treatment Outcome Following Closed Reduction of Nasal Bone Fractures

Rakesh B Nair, T Ajay Das, A Sachin Aslam, Ummar Mangalath, Roshni Abida, Sooraj Soman

Keywords : Closed reduction, Efficacy of closed reduction, Esthetics, Maxillofacial trauma, Nasal fracture.

Citation Information : Nair RB, Das TA, Aslam AS, Mangalath U, Abida R, Soman S. Evaluation of Treatment Outcome Following Closed Reduction of Nasal Bone Fractures. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (10):1174-1180.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2402

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-10-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: The closed reduction of a displaced nasal fracture is a preferred method in oral and maxillofacial surgery. This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the treatment outcome following closed reduction of nasal bone fractures. Materials and methods: A total of 20 patients with nasal bone fracture who underwent closed reduction were included in the study. The cases were operated under local or general anesthesia. The outcome of treatment was evaluated pre- and postoperatively through systematic follow-ups. Clinical assessment was done to evaluate functional (airway patency, nasal obstruction, crepitus) as well as esthetic parameters (facial symmetry, swelling, and nasal deviation). Functional and esthetic satisfaction of patients was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) pre- and post-operatively. Results: It was observed that there was significant improvement in both functional and esthetic parameters following closed reduction of nasal fractures. Conclusion: The present study suggested that closed reduction of nasal bone fracture is very effective in the management of nasal bone fractures. However, further studies with larger sample size in different clinical situations should be considered to confirm the efficacy of the same. Clinical significance: Closed reduction can be a viable and more conservative alternative in management of nasal fractures.


PDF Share
  1. Vilela F, Granjeiro R, Junior CM, Andrade P. Applicability and effectiveness of closed reduction of nasal fractures under Local Anesthesia. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014 Jul;18(3): 266-271.
  2. Faryabi J, Enhesari A, Sigari P, Pouradeli S. Efficacy of closed reduction surgery on the treatment of nasal bone fracture in admitted patients to Shahid Bahanor Hospital, Kerman, Iran. J Oral Health Oral Epidemiol 2016 Sep;5(3):148-153.
  3. Murray JA, Maran AG, Busuttil A, Vaughan G. A pathological classification of nasal fractures. Injury 1986 Sep;17(5):338-344.
  4. Bakardjiev A, Pechalova P. Maxillofacial fractures in Southern Bulgaria – a retrospective study of 1706 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007 Apr;35(3):147-150.
  5. Wulkan M, Parreira JG Jr, Botter DA. Epidemiologia do trauma facial. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2005;51(5):290-295.
  6. Hwang K, You SH, Kim SG, Lee SI. Analysis of nasal bone fractures: a six-year study of 503 patients. J Craniofac Surg 2006 Mar;17(2):261-264.
  7. Fattahi T, Steinberg B, Fernandes R, Mohan M, Reitter E. Repair of nasal complex fractures and the need for secondary septorhinoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006 Dec;64(12):1785-1789.
  8. Moore PM Jr, Harris HE. Fractures of the nasal bones. Am J Surg 1940 Dec;50(3):668-671.
  9. Chan J, Most SP. Diagnosis and management of nasal fractures. Oper Tech Otolaryngol 2008 Dec;19(4):263-266.
  10. Gharehdaghi J, Rad BS, Samani VG, Kolahi F, Zonoozian AK, Marashian SM. Comparison of physical examination and conventional radiography in diagnosis of nasal fracture. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013 Aug;65(Suppl 2):S304-S307.
  11. Bartkiw TP, Pynn BR, Brown DH. Diagnosis and management of nasal fractures. Int J Trauma Nurs 1995 Jan-Mar;1(1):11-18.
  12. Atighechi S, Baradaranfar MH, Akbari SA. Reduction of nasal bone fractures: a comparative study of general, local, and topical anesthesia techniques. J Craniofac Surg 2009 Mar;20(2):382-384.
  13. Kim HS, Lee HK, Jeong HS, Shin HW. Decreased postoperative pain after reduction of fractured nasal bones using a nerve block of the anterior ethmoidal nerve. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013 Jun;42(6):727-731.
  14. Yilmaz MS, Guven M, Varli AF. Nasal fractures: is closed reduction satisfying? J Craniofac Surg 2013 Jan;24(1):e36-e38.
  15. Mondin V, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Management of nasal bone fractures. Am J Otolaryngol 2005 May-Jun;26(3):181-185.
  16. Zimmermann CE, Troulis MJ, Kaban LB. Pediatric facial fractures: recent advances in prevention, diagnosis and management. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005 Jan;34(1):2-13.
  17. Higuera S, Lee EI, Cole P, Hollier LH Jr, Stal S. Nasal trauma and the deviated nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007 Dec;120(Suppl 2): 64S-75S.
  18. Ridder GJ, Boedeker CC, Fradis M, Schipper J. Technique and timing for closed reduction of isolated nasal fractures: A retrospective study. Ear Nose Throat J 2002 Jan;81(1):49-54.
  19. Song SW, Jun BC, Chae SR, Kim BG. Clinical utility of threedimensional facial computed tomography in the treatment of nasal bone fractures: a new modality involving an air-bone view with a volume rendering technique. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013 Aug;65(Suppl 2):210-215.
  20. Cook JA, McRae RD, Irving RM, Dowie LN. A randomized comparison of manipulation of the fractured nose under local and general anaesthesia. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1990 Aug;15(4):343-346.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.