The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of the Effects of Fluoride Prophylactic Agents on Mechanical Properties of Nickel Titanium Wires using Scanning Electron Microscope

Deepika Gupta, Amit K Gupta, Ajay K Gupta, Gita Shukla

Citation Information : Gupta D, Gupta AK, Gupta AK, Shukla G. Evaluation of the Effects of Fluoride Prophylactic Agents on Mechanical Properties of Nickel Titanium Wires using Scanning Electron Microscope. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (3):283-286.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2253

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-03-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Orthodontic treatment these days is increasing in demand, and therefore, it is relatively imperative for the orthodontist to prescribe the use of fluoride-containing products, such as mouthwashes and gels, to help prevent dental caries and maintain healthy oral health. The aim of the study was to assess and evaluate the effects of fluoride prophylactic agents on mechanical properties of nickel titanium (NiTi) wires during orthodontic treatment using scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Materials and methods

We used the commercially available round preformed NiTi orthodontic archwire (3M company) and three different mouthwash solutions, i.e., Phos-Flur gel (1.1% sodium acidulated phosphate fluoride, APF, 0.5% w/v fluoride, pH = 5.1; Colgate Oral Pharmaceuticals) and Prevident 5000 (1.1% sodium fluoride neutral agent, 0.5% w/v fluoride, pH = 7; Colgate Oral Pharmaceuticals). All the specimens were subjected to a three-point bending test on a universal testing machine. To observe the surface morphological changes, one wire from each group was randomly selected and observed under a SEM.

Results

It was observed that there was not much difference in the values of both modulus of elasticity and yield strength obtained after loading of stress on the wires in all the three experimental conditions. A significant difference in both modulus of elasticity and yield strength was observed during unloading of stress. Further, when the surface characteristics were observed for all the specimens using SEM images, it was observed that NiTi wires treated with Phos-Flur showed large surface defects which appeared as round, pitted areas depicting corrosion, numerous white inclusions, and overall damaged surface structure of the wire as compared with the control.

Conclusion

Thus, fluoridated mouthwashes are essential to maintain good oral hygiene and decrease instance of caries in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. The prophylactic usage of topical fluoride agents on NiTi wire seems to diminish the mechanical properties of the orthodontic wire that could significantly affect future treatment outcomes.

Clinical significance

It has been proved that fluoride mouthwashes/gels do affect the structural surface qualities and strength of wires used during the orthodontic treatment irrespective of the composition of the wires. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the clinician to prescribe these prophylactic agents carefully while keeping in mind their pH so that the overall result of the treatment may not be hampered and delayed due to change in properties of the wires used.

How to cite this article

Gupta AK, Shukla G, Sharma P, Gupta AK, Kumar A, Gupta D. Evaluation of the Effects of Fluoride Prophylactic Agents on Mechanical Properties of Nickel Titanium Wires using Scanning Electron Microscope. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(3):283-286.


  1. Effect of fluoride prophylactic agents on the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium-based orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005 Jun;127(6):662-669.
  2. A review of contemporary archwires: their properties and characteristics. Angle Orthod 1997;67(3):197-207.
  3. Galvanic corrosion between orthodontic wires and brackets in fluoride mouthwashes. Eur J Orthod 2006 Jun;28(3):298-304.
  4. Microbial attack of orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995 Aug;108(2):132-141.
  5. Influence of fluoride and chloride on corrosion behavior of NiTi orthodontic wires. Acta Biomater 2007 Sep;3(5):807-815.
  6. Influence of fluoride content and pH on the corrosion resistance of titanium and its alloys. Biomaterials 2002 May;23(9):1995-2002.
  7. Influence of fluoride on titanium in an acidic environment measured by polarization resistance technique. J Appl Biomater 1995 Winter;6(4):283-288.
  8. Enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with hybrid glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998 Dec;114(6):668-674.
  9. Effect of a fluoride varnish on demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999 Aug;116(2):159-167.
  10. Corrosion of stainless steel, nickel-titanium, coated nickel-titanium, and titanium orthodontic wires. Angle Orthod 1999 Feb;69(1):39-44.
  11. Effect of fluoride prophylactic agents on the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium wires: an in vitro Study. J Indian Orthod Soc 2011 Oct-Dec;45(4):237-242.
  12. Effect of long-term immersion corrosion on the flexural properties of nitinol. Am J Orthod 1982 Jul;82(1):45-49.
  13. Mechanical properties and surface characterization of translucent composite wire following topical fluoride treatment. Angle Orthod 2012 Jan;82(1):8-13.
  14. Hydrogen embrittlement of work-hardened Ni-Ti alloy in fluoride solutions. Biomaterials 2005 Jan;26(1):101-108.
  15. Effect of fluoride concentration and pH on corrosion behavior of titanium for dental use. J Dent Res 1999 Sep;78(9):1568-1572.
  16. Surface changes induced by fluoride prophylactic agents on titanium-based orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003 Jun;123(6):653-656.
  17. Effect of fluoride on nickel-titanium and stainless steel orthodontic archwires: an in-vitro study. J Dent (Tehran) 2015 Jan;12(1):49-59.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.