The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Assessment of Salivary Catalase, α-Amylase, and Cotinine Levels in Chronic Smokers: A Comparative Study

Satvinder Singh, Mamta Sharma, Nitika Rohilla, Varun Salgotra, Varun Kumar, Rahul K Sharma

Citation Information : Singh S, Sharma M, Rohilla N, Salgotra V, Kumar V, Sharma RK. Assessment of Salivary Catalase, α-Amylase, and Cotinine Levels in Chronic Smokers: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (3):253-256.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2247

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-04-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction

One of the common practices observed in many parts of the world is smoking, of which tobacco forms an important constituent which is burned and inhaled. Smoking is known to have potential effect on body’s immune system, antioxidants level, and salivary cotinine levels. Hence, we planned the present study to evaluate the impact of cigarette smoke on salivary antioxidant levels and cotinine levels in smokers and nonsmokers.

Materials and methods

The present study included assessment of salivary parameters of smokers and nonsmokers. A total of 400 subjects were analyzed, of which 200 were active smokers and 200 were nonsmokers. Unstimulated salivary samples were taken and assessment of α-amylase levels was done using biochemical kit and spectrophotometer. Assessment of salivary catalase (CAT) activity was done using Luck method. For the determination of cotinine levels, Bioassay Technology Laboratory kit was used using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. After the assessment of levels of all the salivary parameters, all the data were recorded, compiled, and analyzed.

Results

α-Amylase in smokers and nonsmokers group was found to be 206.25 and 169.85 U/mL respectively. Nonsignificant results were obtained while comparing the salivary α-amylase levels among the two study groups. Nonsignificant results were obtained while comparing the salivary CAT levels among the smokers and nonsmokers group. We observed statistically significant results while comparing mean cotinine levels among smokers group and nonsmokers group.

Conclusion

Alteration in cotinine levels occurs in smokers in comparison to nonsmokers.

Clinical significance

Smoking can cause harmful effect on the oral mucous membrane by altering salivary defense components.

How to cite this article

Singh S, Sharma M, Rohilla N, Salgotra V, Kumar V, Sharma RK. Assessment of Salivary Catalase, α-Amylase, and Cotinine Levels in Chronic Smokers: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(3):253-256.


HTML PDF Share
  1. The history of the discovery of the cigarette-lung cancer link: evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll. Tob Control 2012 Mar;21(2):87-91.
  2. Global Burden of Disease Report. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
  3. Characterization of the differentiated antioxidant profile of human saliva. Free Radic Biol Med 2002 Feb;32(3):268-277.
  4. Superoxide dismutase. An enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J Biol Chem 1969 Nov;244(22):6049-6055.
  5. Cigarette smoke effect on salivary antioxidants and oral cancer novel concept. Isr Med Assoc J 2004 Nov;6(11):691-694.
  6. A comparison of the total antioxidant capacity of some human body fluids. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2003;8(2):415-419.
  7. Comparison of superoxide dismutase activity in saliva of smokers and nonsmokers. South Med J 2010 May;103(5):425-427.
  8. Effect of Vitamin C on salivary superoxide dismutase activity in smokers. Afr J Biotechnol 2011 Jul;10(37):7267-7270.
  9. Effect of smoking one cigarette on antioxidant metabolites in the saliva of healthy smokers. Arch Oral Biol 1999 Jun;44(6):485-488.
  10. The impact of saliva collection and processing methods on CRP, igE, and myoglobin immunoassays. Clin Transl Med 2012 Sep;1(1):19.
  11. The levels of plasma and salivary antioxidants in the patient with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. J Oral Pathol Med 2005 Jan;34(1):7-12.
  12. The Tobacco Atlas. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
  13. Comparison of salivary cotinine concentration in cigarette smokers, water pipe smokers and non-smokers. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2014 Winter;26(1):39-45.
  14. Salivary cotinine-biomarker of tobacco consumption in the assessment of passive smoking prevalence. Farmacia 2012;60(5):662-674.
  15. Comparison of cotinine salivary levels in hookah smokers, passive smokers, and non-smokers. Addict Health 2015 Summer-Autumn;7(3-4):184-191.
  16. Evaluation of salivary catalase, Vitamin C, and alpha-amylase in smokers and non-smokers: a retrospective cohort study. J Oral Pathol Med 2017 May;46(5):377-380.
  17. Saliva cotinine levels in smokers and nonsmokers. Am J Epidemiol 2000 Feb;151(3):251-258.
  18. Evaluation of salivary Vitamin C and catalase in HIV positive and healthy HIV negative control group. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2017;17(2):101-105.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.