The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 8 ( 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Efficacy of Rotary and Hand Instrument in removing Gutta-percha and Sealer from Root Canals of Endodontically Treated Teeth

Sheetal Mali, Amit Patil, Deepak Hegde, Himmat Jaiswal, Hrishikesh Saoji, Dhairaysheel N Edake

Keywords : Hand instruments, ProTaper, Retreatment, Rotary instruments, Stereomicroscope.

Citation Information : Mali S, Patil A, Hegde D, Jaiswal H, Saoji H, Edake DN. Efficacy of Rotary and Hand Instrument in removing Gutta-percha and Sealer from Root Canals of Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (8):964-968.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2366

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: One of the common dental procedures employed these days in patients with irreversible pulpitis is root canal therapy. In retreatment cases, it is necessary for complete removal of obturate gutta-percha (GP) from obturate root canal system. Various methods and techniques are available these days for this purpose. This study was aimed to assess the efficacy of D-RaCe files, ProTaper retreatment files, Mtwo retreatment files, and manual Hedstrom files (H-files) in removing filling materials from the root canals of the endodontically treated teeth. Materials and methods: The present study included comparative evaluation of efficacy of nickel–titanium (NiTi) retreatment instruments and H-files in removing GP and sealer from root canals. All the samples were randomly and broadly divided into four study groups based on the instrumentation technique for removing the root canal fillings. Evaluation of the results was done based on operating time and remaining root canal filling material. Stereomicroscopic evaluation of the samples was done at 8× magnification. Results: All the results were assessed and analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Least quantity of filling material was left by ProTaper retreatment files. When put together in decreasing order, the efficacy of different study groups, in terms of mean time taken for retreatment, was found to be as follows: D-RaCe > ProTaper Retreatment > Mtwo Retreatment > H-file. Conclusion: No single technique can completely remove obturating fillings from the root canals of endodontically treated teeth. However, rotary instruments are better in comparison with hand instruments for removing the GP from obturate root canals. Clinical significance: ProTaper retreatment files and D-RaCe files are recommended over other instrument systems in terms of quality for managing retreatment root canal cases.


PDF Share
  1. Bodrumlu E, Uzun O, Topuz O, Semiz M. Efficacy of 3 techniques in removing root canal filling material. J Can Dent Assoc 2008 Oct;74(8):721.
  2. Hargreaves, KM.; Cohen, S. Cohen's pathways of pulp. 10th ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2011.
  3. Kasam S, Mariswamy AB. Efficacy of different methods for removing root canal filling material in retreatment—an in-vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016 Jun;10(6):ZC06-ZC10.
  4. Bhagavaldas MC, Diwan A, Kusumvalli S, Pasha S, Devale M, Chava DC. Efficacy of two rotary retreatment systems in removing Gutta-percha and sealer during endodontic retreatment with or without solvent: a comparative in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):12-16.
  5. Kumar P, Sood H, Bhat SP, Lohar J, Punia SK, Bhargava R. Comparison of efficiency of manual (H-Files) and two rotary niti retreatment systems (Mtwo R files and HyFlex NT files) in removing Gutta-percha from root canals obturated with two different sealers by using stereomicroscope—an in vitro study. Endodontology 2017 Nov;29(2):95-100.
  6. de Souza PF, Oliveira Goncalves LC, Franco Marques AA, Sponchiado Junior EC, Roberti Garcia Ld, de Carvalho FM. Root canal retreatment using reciprocating and continuous rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Eur J Dent 2015 Apr-Jun; 9(2):234-239.
  7. Akpinar KE, Altunbas D, Kustarci A. The efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments and H-files to remove gutta-percha from root canals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012 May; 17(3):e506-e511.
  8. Kvist T, Reit C. The perceived benefit of endodontic retreatment. Int Endod J 2002 Apr;35(4):359-365.
  9. Somma F, Cammarota G, Plotino G, Grande NM, Pameijer CH. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials. J Endod 2008 Apr;34(4):466-469.
  10. Rossi-Fedele G, Ahmed HM. Assessment of root canal filling removal effectiveness using micro-computed tomography: a systematic review. J Endod 2017 Apr;43(4):520-526.
  11. Karamifar K, Mehrasa N, Pardis P, Saghiri MA. Cleanliness of canal walls following gutta-percha removal with hand files, RaCe and RaCe plus XP-endo finisher instruments: a photographic in vitro analysis. Iran Endod J 2017 Spring;12(2): 242-247.
  12. Schirrmeister JF, Meyer KM, Hermanns P, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT. Effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing a new synthetic polymer-based root canal obturation material (Epiphany) during retreatment. Int Endod J 2006 Feb;39(2):150-156.
  13. Takahashi CM, Cunha RS, Martin AS, Fontana CE, Silveira CF, da Silveira Bueno CE. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of ProTaper universal rotary retreatment system for guttapercha removal with or without a solvent. J Endod 2009 Nov;35(11):1580-1583.
  14. Cunha RS, De Martin AS, Barros PP, Silva FM, Jacinto RC, Bueno CE. In vitro evaluation of the cleansing working time and analysis of the amount of gutta-percha or resilon remnants in the root canal walls after instrumentation for endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2007 Dec;33(12):1426-1428.
  15. Royzenblat A, Goodell GG. Comparison of removal times of thermafil plastic obturators using ProFile rotary instruments at different rotational speeds in moderately curved canals. J Endod 2007 Mar;33(3):256-258.
  16. Akhavan H, Azdadi YK, Azimi S, Dadresanfar B, Ahmadi A. Comparing the efficacy of Mtwo and D-RaCe retreatment systems in removing residual gutta-percha and sealer in the root canal. Iran Endod J 2012 Summer;7(3):122-126.
  17. Tachinami H, Katsuumi I. Removal of root canal filling materials using Er:YAG laser irradiation. Dent Mater J 2010 May;29(3):246-252.
  18. Anjo T, Ebihara A, Takeda A, Takashina M, Sunakawa M, Suda H. Removal of two types of root canal filling material using pulsed Nd:YAG laser irradiation. Photomed Laser Surg 2004 Dec;22(6):470-476.
  19. Khalilak Z, Vatanpour M, Dadresanfar B, Moshkelgosha P, Nourbakhsh H. In vitro comparison of gutta-percha removal with H-File and ProTaper with or without chloroform. Iran Endod J 2013 Winter;8(1):6-9.
  20. Marfisi K, Mercade M, Plotino G, Duran-Sindreu F, Bueno R, Roig M. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals. Int Endod J 2010 Nov;43(11):1022-1028.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.