The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2019 ) > List of Articles


Epidemiology of Malocclusion in 3,491 Subjects Attending Public Dental Service in Rome (Italy): Evaluation of the Orthodontic Treatment Need Index

Alessandra Giordano, Rosanna Guarnieri, Gabriella Galluccio, Michele Cassetta, Roberto Di Giorgio, Antonella Polimeni, Ersilia Barbato

Keywords : Dental anomalies, Epidemiological survey, Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need, Malocclusion, Orthodontics

Citation Information : Giordano A, Guarnieri R, Galluccio G, Cassetta M, Giorgio RD, Polimeni A, Barbato E. Epidemiology of Malocclusion in 3,491 Subjects Attending Public Dental Service in Rome (Italy): Evaluation of the Orthodontic Treatment Need Index. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (5):631-638.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2570

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: The objective of this epidemiological survey is to investigate the dental-skeletal features of subjects attending the Public Dental Service in Unità Operativa Complessa (UOC) (Orthodontic Department of “La Sapienza University of Rome”) and compare them with the existing body of evidence obtained from other surveys. Accordingly, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) was employed, in order to achieve a common framework to allow the shaping of public health prevention practices. Materials and methods: A sample of 3,491 subjects in the Orthodontic Department of “La Sapienza-University of Rome” (UOC) was evaluated with the adoption of IOTN to define malocclusion severity. Results: In the result analysis, it was observed that class II malocclusion was more frequent in the sample (40%), and a large part of the examined population also presented mandibular dental crowding (43%), increased overjet (41%), and increased overbite (38%). Only 26.44% (20.17% IOTN 4; 6.27% IOTN 5) had strong need for orthodontic treatment. Conclusion: The realization of epidemiological investigations to establish priority for treatment need is, therefore, particularly useful, not only to estimate the prevalence of some clinical conditions in the observed population, but also to plan targeted interventions, such as interceptive and corrective therapies in growing children. Clinical significance: These interventions could solve specific clinical situations and/or prevent their escalation. Only in this way, it is possible to avoid fragmentation of the limited resources available, using them for patients with an objective need.

PDF Share
  1. Massler M, Frankel JM. Prevalence of malocclusion in children aged 14 to 18 years. Am J Orthod 1951 Oct;37(10):751–768.
  2. Summers CJ. The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. Am J Orthod 1971 Jun;59(6):552–567.
  3. Grainger RM. Orthodontic treatment priority index. Vital Health Stat 2 1967 Dec;(25):1–49
  4. Lindauer SJ, Thresher AA, et al. Orthodontic treatment priority: a comparison of two indices. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998 Winter;22(2): 125–131.
  5. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309–320
  6. Souames M, Bassigny F, et al. Orthodontic treatment need in French school children: an epidemiological study using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:605–609. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjl045.
  7. Burden DJ, Holmes A. The need for orthodontic treatment in the child population of the UK. Eur J Orthod 1994;16(5):395–399.
  8. Chestnutt IG, Burden DJ, et al. The orthodontic condition of children in the United Kingdom. Br Dent J 2006;200:609–612.
  9. Josefsson E, Bjerklin K, et al. Malocclusion frequency in Swedish and immigrant adolescents—influence of origin on orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:79–87. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjl054.
  10. Migale D, Barbato E, et al. Oral health and malocclusion in 10-to-11 years-old children in southern Italy. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2009 Mar;10(1):13–18.
  11. Franchi L, Baccetti T, et al. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000 Sep;118(3):335–340. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.107009.
  12. Baccetti T, Franchi L, et al. Cephalometric variables predicting the long-term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004 Jul;126(1):16–22. DOI: 10.1016/S0889540604001556.
  13. Birkeland K, Furevik J, et al. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes by the PAR Index. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:279–288.
  14. Manzanera D, Montiel-Company JM, et al. Orthodontic treatment need in Spanish schoolchildren: an epidemiological study using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:180–183. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn089.
  15. Luzzi V, Ierardo G, et al. Evaluation of the orthodontic treatment need in a paediatric sample from Southern Italy and its importance among paediatricians for improving oral health in pediatric dentistry. J Clin Exp Dent 2017 Aug 1;9(8):e995–e1001. DOI: 10.4317/jced.54005.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.