Citation Information :
Kumar MV, Narayanan V, Jalaluddin M, Almalki SA, Dey SM, Sathe S. Assessment of Clinical Efficacy of Different Periodontal Dressing Materials on Wound Healing: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (8):896-900.
Aim: The present study aims to assess the efficacy of different periodontal dressing materials on wound healing clinically.
Materials and methods: A total of 45 patients between the age group of 30–45 years, with chronic generalized periodontitis with loss of attachment of 3–6 mm, who require periodontal flap surgery, were screened to include in the study. Out of 45 subjects, 24 were males and 21 were females. The subjects were randomized into 3 groups as 15 in each. Group I: a collagen dressing, group II: light-cure dressing, and group III: non-eugenol-based dressing. The clinical parameters such as plaque index, vertical probing depth, pain, gingival index, and patient satisfaction were documented for all the three groups on the 7th and the 14th day. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to score the pain severity. The SPSS 20 software was used to analyze the data. The significance level was set at 5%.
Results: The mean gingival index score reduced from 1.40 ± 0.14 to 1.10 ± 0.30 in group I, from 1.48 ± 0.01 to 1.26 ± 0.22 in group II, and from 1.58 ± 0.16 to 1.33 ± 0.10 in group III. The mean plaque index score reduced from 1.48 ± 0.56 to 1.18 ± 0.40 in group I, from 1.46 ± 0.01 to 1.24 ± 0.48 in group II, and from 1.42 ± 0.12 to 1.20 ± 0.20 in group III. There was a statistical difference found in all the three groups and between the groups from the plaque and gingival index scores. The probing depth comparison shows a significant difference in group I. Patient satisfaction was almost similar in all the groups. The pain index showed the reduction in the pain severity from the 7th day to the 14th day in all the subjects from all the three groups.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that the periodontal wound covered with a collagen dressing material showed significant evidence to provide symptomatic relief and better healing to the patients compared to that of light-cure and non-eugenol periodontal dressing material.
Monje A, Kramp AR, et al. Effect of periodontal dressing on non-surgical periodontal treatment outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 2016;14(3):161–167. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12130.
Kathariya R, Jain H, et al. To pack or not to pack: the current status of periodontal dressings. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2015;13(2): e73–e86. DOI: 10.5301/jabfm.5000215.
Baghani Z, Kadkhodazadeh M. Periodontal Dressing: A Review Article. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2013;7(4):183–191.
Habiboallah G, Mahdi Z, et al. Enhancement of gingival wound healing by local application of silver nanoparticles periodontal dressing following surgery: A histological assessment in animal model. Mod Res Inflamm 2014;3:128–138. DOI: 10.4236/mri.2014. 33016.
Soheilifar S, Bidgoli M, et al. Effect of periodontal dressing on wound healing and patient satisfaction following periodontal flap surgery. J Dent (Tehran) 2015;12(2):151–156.
Sigusch BW, Pfitzner A, et al. Periodontal dressing (Vocopac) influences outcomes in a two-step treatment procedure. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:401–405. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00686.x.
Farman M, Joshi RI. Full-mouth treatment versus quadrant root surface debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a systematic review. Br Dent J 2008;205:E18. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.874, discussion 496-7.
Cheshire PD, Griffiths GS, et al. Evaluation of the healing response following placement of Coe-pak and an experimental pack after periodontal flap surgery. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:188–193. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb02075.x.
Freedman M, Stassen LF. Commonly used topical oral wound dressing materials in dental and surgical practice--a literature review. J Ir Dent Assoc 2013;59(4):190–195.
Garg S, Arora SA, et al. Comparative evaluation of patient's acceptability between polyether and non - eugenol based periodontal dressings - a randomised control clinical trial. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2017;8(9):3917–3922.
Gilbert AD, Lioyd CH, et al. The effect of a light cured Periodontal dressing on HeLa cells and fibroblasts in vitro. J Periodontol 1994;65:325–329. DOI: 10.1902/jop.19184.108.40.2064.
Angwan N, Gothi R, et al. Comparative evaluation between relative efficacy of three periodontal dressings after conventional depigmentation: A clinical study. J Sci 2015;8:692–698.
Jorkjend L, Skoglund LA. Effect of non-eugenol and eugenol containing periodontal dressings on the incidence and severity of pain after periodontal soft tissue surgery. J Clin Period 1990;17: 341–344. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1990.tb00028.x.
Cullen B, Watt PW, et al. The role of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen in chronic wound repair and its potential mechanism of action. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2002;34:1544–1556. DOI: 10.1016/S1357-2725(02)00054-7.
Madan E, Bharti V, et al. Light-cured resin “Barricaid”- An aesthetic and biocompatible dressing: A step ahead. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17:753–756. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.124494.
Ghanbari H, Forouzanfar A, et al. Modified Widman flap procedure: With or without periodontal dressing? Open J Stomatol 2012;2: 170–172. DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2012.23031.
Bae SB, Lim SB, et al. A Comparative study of clinical effects following periodontal surgery with and without dressing. J Korean Acad Periodontal 1999;29(3):693–701. DOI: 10.5051/jkape.19220.127.116.113.
Kakar A, Lamba AK, et al. Gingival tissue response following placement of a light cure dressing and a non-eugenol dressing after periodontal flap procedure: A comparative clinical study. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2018;9:65–71. DOI: 10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_75_17.