The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Reconstruction of Interimplant Papilla by Demineralized Freeze-dried Bone Allograft Block Fixed by Titanium Screw in Maxillary Esthetic Zone

Priti Charde, Kaustubh S Thakare, Manohar Laxman Bhongade, Aleksa Markovic, Aniruddha M Deshpande

Citation Information : Charde P, Thakare KS, Bhongade ML, Markovic A, Deshpande AM. Reconstruction of Interimplant Papilla by Demineralized Freeze-dried Bone Allograft Block Fixed by Titanium Screw in Maxillary Esthetic Zone. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (11):1205-1209.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2960

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-04-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate effectiveness of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) block fixed by titanium screw for reconstructing interimplant papilla in maxillary esthetic zone during one-stage early loading multiple implant procedure. Materials and methods: A total of 20 implants were placed in 10 systemically healthy patients (2 implants per patient) for replacement of multiple teeth by early loading one-stage implants along with interimplant papilla reconstruction using DFDBA block fixed by titanium screw. At the baseline, 6 months, and at 1 year, clinical measurements (interimplant papillary height measurement, papilla contour) and radiographic measurements were recorded. Results: At 1 year, mean gain in interimplant vertical crestal bone was 1.7 mm, and complete reconstruction of the papilla was observed in 90% cases. Conclusion: Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft block fixed by titanium screw for reconstruction of interimplant papilla in maxillary esthetic zone during one-stage early loading multiple implant procedure is effective. Clinical significance: Presence of interimplant papilla is of utmost importance for esthetically successful implant-supported restoration in the anterior region. This technique leads to reconstruction of interimplant papilla, thus providing esthetic appearance.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scan J Plastic Reconstr Surg 1969;3(2):81–100. DOI: 10.3109/02844316909036699.
  2. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1–132.
  3. The reaction of bone, connective tissue and epithelium to endosteal implants with sprayed titanium surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981;9:15–25. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0503(81)80007-0.
  4. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 1992;63(12):995–996. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.12.995.
  5. The interproximal height of bone: a guidepost to predictable aesthetic strategies and soft tissue contours in anterior tooth replacement. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1998;10(9):1131–1141.
  6. Stability of the mucosal topography around single-tooth implants and adjacent teeth: 1-year results. Int J Periodont Restorat Dent 2000;20(1):11–17.
  7. Root coverage using a free soft tissue autograft following citric acid application: Part I. Technique. Int J Periodont Restorat Dent 1982;2:65–70.
  8. Management of advanced periodontitis: Part I. Preliminary report of method of surgical reconstruction. New Z Dent J 1965;61:180–187.
  9. The subpedicle connective tissue graft: a bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surfaces. J Periodontal 1987;58(2):95–102. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1987.58.2.95.
  10. Guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of human facial recession: a 12-case report. J Periodontol 1992;65(6):554–560. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.6.554.
  11. Developing optimal periimpalnt papilla within esthetic zone: guided soft tissue augmentation. J Esthet Dent 1995;7(3):125–129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1995.tb00729.x.
  12. Morphology of the interdental papilla. J Periodontol 1965;36(6):21–26. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1965.36.6.455.
  13. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region. J Periodontol 2001;72(10):1364–1371. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1364.
  14. D. Interimplant papilla reconstruction: assessment of soft tissue changes and results of 12 consecutive cases. J Periodontol 2001;72(7):958–962. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.7.958.
  15. Regeneration of the gingival papillae after single- implant treatment. Int J Periodont Restorat Dent 2003;17:326–333.
  16. Effects of immediate loading with threaded hydroxyapatite coated root-form implants on single premolar replacements: a preliminary report. Int J of Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17(4):567–572.
  17. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007;9(4):22–227. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00045.x.
  18. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12(5):423–432. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x.
  19. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodont Restorat Dent 2005;25:113–119.
  20. Use of a titanium papillary insert for the construction of interimplant papillae. Implant Dent 2000;9(4):358–362. DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200009040-00013.
  21. Single-tooth replacement in the aesthetic zone with immediate provisionalization: fourteen consecutive case reports. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1998;10:1107–1114.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.