AH Plus, Bio C Sealer, MTA Fillapex, Root canals
Citation Information :
Trivedi S, Chhabra S, Bansal A, Kukreja N, Mishra N, Trivedi A, Gill P. Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (3):291-295.
Aim: To evaluate the sealing ability of three different types of sealers using confocal laser microscopy. Materials and methods: Sixty extracted single-root premolars were selected and divided into three groups (20 teeth in each group) according to the type of sealer used, namely, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Fillapex, AH Plus, and Bio C Sealer. Root canal preparation and obturation were done in all the samples. Roots was dissected transversely in apical plane. Percentage of gap from region to canal circumference was calculated using a confocal laser microscope. Samples were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: High dye penetration was seen with AH Plus compared to MTA Fillapex and least with Bio C Sealer. The AH Plus is the best sealer with respect to seal ability of all the three. Conclusion: This study helps to appraise the sealing ability of the different types of sealers using confocal laser microscopy which is useful for the success of root canal treatment. Clinical significance: As sealer has to seal voids, foramina, and canals, it should have good penetration for the success of root canal treatment.
Tyagi S, Mishra P, Tyagi P. Evolution of root canal sealers: an insight story. Eur J Gen Dent 2013;2(3):199–218. DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.115976.
Gomes-Filho JE, Moreira JV, Watanabe S, et al. Sealability of MTA and calcium hydroxide containing sealers. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20(3): 347–351. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572012000300009.
Almeida JF, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, et al. Filling of artificial lateral canals and microleakage and flow of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2007;40(9):692–699. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01268.x.
Camilleri J, Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, et al. Dynamic sealing ability of MTA root canal sealer. Int Endod J 2011;44(1):9–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01774.x.
Al-Haddad A, Che Ab Aziz ZA. Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: A review. Int J Bio 2016; 1–10. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9753210.
Al-Haddad A, Abu Kasim NH, Che Ab Aziz ZA. Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Dent Mater J 2015;34(4):516–521. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2015-049.
Khandelwal D, Ballal NV. Recent advances in root canal sealers. Int J Clin Dent 2016;9(3):183–194.
Henston JL, Sharma N, Subhash C, et al. Root canal sealers and its role in successful endodontics: a review. ADR 2012;2(2):68–78.
Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Ardila CN, et al. Fluid movement along the coronal two thirds of root fillings placed by three different guttapercha techniques. Int Endod J 2003;35:54–63.
Gomes-Filho JE, Bernabé PF, Nery MJ, et al. Reaction of rat connective tissue to a new calcium hydroxide based sealer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106(2):71–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.030.
Venturi M, Prati C, Capelli G, et al. A preliminary analysis of the morphology of lateral canals after root canal filling using a tooth clearing technique. Int Endod J 2003;36(1):54–63. DOI: 10.1046/j.0143-2885.2003.00613.x.
Marín-Bauza GA, Silva-Sousa YT, da Cunha SA, et al. Physiochemical properties of endodontic sealers of different bases. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20(4):455–461. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572012000400011.
Rawtiya M, Verma K, Singh S, et al. MTA based root canal sealers. J OrafacRes 2013;3(1):16–21. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10026-1057.
Angelus. MTA Fillapex bio ceramic endodontic sealer. Scientific Technical Profile 2018; 8–18.
Gandolfi MG, Prati C. MTA and F-doped MTA cements used as sealers with warm gutta-percha long-term study of sealing ability. Int Endod J 2010;43(10):889–901. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01763.x.
Viapiana R, Flumignan DL, Guerreiro TJM, et al. Physicochemical and mechanical properties of zirconium oxide and niobium oxide modified Portland cement-based experimental endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2014;47(5):437–448. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12167.
Candeiro GT, Correia FC, Duarte MA, et al. Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod 2012;38(6):842–845. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.029.
Hubbe KL, de Oliveria KVD, Coelho BS, et al. AH plus extrusion into apical tissue: literature review of main related properties and report of clinical cases. RSBO 2016;13(4):280–288. DOI: 10.21726/rsbo.v13i4.352.
Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Endod 40(4):505–508. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.042.
El Hachem R, Khalil I, Le Brun G, et al. Dentinal tubules penetration of AH plus, BC sealer and novel tricalcium silicate sealer: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Clin Oral Inv 2019;23(4):1871–1876. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2632-6.
Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, et al. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod 2013;39(10):1281–1286. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012.
Weller RN, Tay KC, Garrett LV, et al. Microscopic appearance and apical seal of root canals filled with gutta-percha and ProRoot Endo sealer after immersion in a phosphate-containing fluid. Int Endod J 2008;41(11):977–986. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01462.x.
Yigit DH, Gencoglu N. Evaluation of resin/silicon based sealers. Part I: Physical properties. Dig J NanomaterBiostruct 2012;7(1):107–115.
Singh H, Markan S, Kaur M, et al. Endodontic sealers”: current concepts and comparative analysis. Dent Open J 2015;2(1):32–37. DOI: 10.17140/DOJ-2-107.