The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2021 ) > List of Articles

CLINICAL TECHNIQUE

A Simple Technique to Repair Feldspathic Porcelain Chipping in Screw-retained Implant-supported Prosthesis: A Clinical Technique

Lenin Proaño, Rebeca K Silva, Ariadne CC Cruz, Mutlu Özcan, Claudia ÂM Volpato

Keywords : Composite resin, Dental prosthesis, Denture repair, Implant-supported prosthesis

Citation Information : Proaño L, Silva RK, Cruz AC, Özcan M, Volpato CÂ. A Simple Technique to Repair Feldspathic Porcelain Chipping in Screw-retained Implant-supported Prosthesis: A Clinical Technique. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (1):101-104.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3012

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 19-04-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: This clinical technique report aimed to describe a composite resin repair technique performed in an implant-supported prosthesis. Background: Veneering ceramic fracture or chipping is one of the most frequent clinical failures in dentistry. Therefore, the use of less time- and cost-consuming ceramic repair techniques is helpful in clinical practice. Technique: Briefly, to treat the ceramic surface, the glaze was removed at the margins of the fracture area, then, air-abrasion and acid-etching were performed. To promote chemical adhesion, a silane coupling agent and adhesive system were applied over the ceramic surface, and the composite resin was applied by incremental technique. Finally, the polish was performed. Conclusion: In conclusion, the applied composite resin repair of feldspathic porcelain chipping in implant-supported prosthesis was a simple, easy, affordable, and minimally invasive treatment. Clinical significance: The causes of veneer materials failures in metal-ceramic crowns are considered a challenge for the dentist and a problem that displeases patients. Repairs are indicated to prevent cracks from spreading and to prevent the accumulation of biofilm on the damaged surface. Therefore, different repair protocols have been proposed to enhance the esthetic, functionality, and longevity of the implant-supported prosthesis. Additionally, the success of the clinical cases depends on the capability to identify ceramic failures and the ability to indicate/perform the correct repair protocol. Since the described repair technique of the fractured screw-retained implant-supported prosthesis was a simple, easy, affordable, and minimally invasive treatment, with excellent esthetic and masticatory results, it represents an interesting clinical option.


PDF Share
  1. Özcan M. Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2003 Mar;30(3):265–269. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01038.x.
  2. Özcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical Study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont 2002 May;15(3):299–302.
  3. Du Q, Zhao K, Swain MV. Fractographic analysis of anterior bilayered ceramic crowns that failed by veneer chipping. Quintessence Int 2014 May;45(5):369–376. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a31536.
  4. Zhou Y, Gao J, Luo L, et al. Does bruxism contribute to dental implant failure? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016 Apr;18(2):410–420. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12300.
  5. Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Larsson C. Retrospective clinical evaluation of 2- to 6-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: mean follow-up of 9 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2020 Apr;22(2):201–212. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12889.
  6. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years IV. Cantilever or extension FPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004 Oct;15(6):667–676. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01120.x.
  7. Adler L, Buhlin K, Jansson L. Survival and complications: a 9- to 15-year retrospective follow-up of dental implant therapy. J Oral Rehabil 2020 Jan;47(1):67–77. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12866.
  8. Sadid-Zadeh R, Kutkut A, Kim H. Prosthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2015 Jan;59(1):195–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.008.
  9. Garbelotto LG, Fukushima KA, Özcan M, et al. Chipping of veneering ceramic on a lithium disilicate anterior single crown: description of repair method and a fractographic failure analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019 Jul;31(4):299–303. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12468.
  10. Loomans B, Özcan M. Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations: procedures and guidelines. Oper Dent 2016 Sep;41(S7):S68–S78. DOI: 10.2341/15-269-LIT.
  11. Heintze S, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010 Nov–Dec;23(6):493–502.
  12. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015 Jan;34(2):161–167. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-159.
  13. Özcan M. How to repair ceramic chipping or fracture in metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses intraorally: step-by-step procedures. J Adhes Dent 2014 Oct;16(5):491–492. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a33094.
  14. Özcan M, Volpato CA. Surface conditioning protocol for the adhesion of resin-based materials to glassy matrix ceramics: how to condition and why? J Adhes Dent 2015 Jun;17(3):292–293. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a34590.
  15. Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations—criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater 2013 Jan;29(1):28–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006.
  16. Özcan M. Evaluation of alternative intra-oral repair techniques for fractured ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Feb;30(2):194–203. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01037.x.
  17. Blum IR, Jagger DC, Wilson NH. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 2: all-ceramics and porcelain fused to metal systems. Dent Update 2011 Apr;38(3):150–158. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2011.38.3.150.
  18. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Özcan M, et al. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004 Mar;17(2):155–164.
  19. Lohbauer U, Scherrer SS, Della Bona A, et al. ADM guidance-ceramics: all-ceramic multilayer interfaces in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2017 Jun;33(6):585–598. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.005.
  20. Nogueira IO, Oliveira PF, Magno MB, et al. Does the application of an adhesive layer improve the bond strength of etched and silanized glass ceramics to resin-based materials? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2021 Jan;125(1):56–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.005.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.