The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2021 ) > List of Articles


In Vitro Evaluation of the Efficacy of Three Different Remineralizing Agents on Artificial Enamel Lesions in Primary Teeth: A Comparative Study

Sameer Punathil, Mohamad R Alqhtani, Preethi Sathydevi, Moaz M Almoteb, S Preethi Archana, Niranjana Arumugasamy

Keywords : Artificial enamel lesion, Demineralization, Primary teeth, Remineralization

Citation Information : Punathil S, Alqhtani MR, Sathydevi P, Almoteb MM, Archana SP, Arumugasamy N. In Vitro Evaluation of the Efficacy of Three Different Remineralizing Agents on Artificial Enamel Lesions in Primary Teeth: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (11):1308-1313.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3215

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 24-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of three various remineralizing agents on artificial enamel lesions in deciduous teeth. Materials and methods: Eighty primary teeth that were implicated for extraction were taken from patients of 4 to 14 years of age. Every specimen was subjected to air drying followed by the creation of 3 × 3 mm window positioned on the central surface of the coronal portion of the tooth to restrict the area of investigation. A digital pH meter was utilized to formulate a demineralizing solution by checking the pH before and following formulation of the solution. A total of 80 specimens (20 in every group) were allocated to three of the following experimental groups and one control group: group I: control, group II: tricalcium phosphate, group III: casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate-fluoride (CPP-ACPF), and group IV: calcium sucrose phosphate (CaSP). Specimens in every group were subjected to treatment with the assigned remineralizing substance once in 24 hours for 14 days. Confocal laser scanning microscopic (CLSM) evaluation of the samples was performed to assess the baseline and posttreatment remineralization as well as demineralization. Results: CPP-ACPF group (110.73 ± 0.11) displayed the greatest mean remineralization depth, in pursuit by the calcium orthophosphate complex (CaSP) group (122.19 ± 0.28), tricalcium phosphate group (126.87 ± 0.15) as well as the control group (158.46 ± 0.07). These differences amid the investigational groups for remineralization were significant. The greatest depth (μ) area of remineralization was seen in the CPP-ACPF group (50.29 ± 0.06) in pursuit by the CaSP group (36.70 ± 0.17) as well as the tricalcium phosphate group (33.29 ± 0.06). This difference amid the remineralizing agents was statistically significant. Conclusion: Amid the confines of the limitations of the current research, it may be concluded that the three remineralizing agents studied, exhibited a remineralization capability on the artificially induced lesions in enamel. CPP-ACPF exhibited the greatest remineralization capability in comparison with the CaSP and tricalcium phosphate groups. Clinical significance: Dental caries is an unalterable course that leads to everlasting loss of dental hard tissues with eventual formation of a cavity. Off late, numerous techniques have centered on applying remineralizing substances to early lesions due to dental caries, aiming at arresting demineralization while encouraging remineralization. Such remineralizing substances form an atmosphere that is superconcentrated with calcium and phosphate, thereby forcing these ions to diffuse into the unoccupied areas, thereby avoiding further loss of minerals.

  1. Abou Neel EA, Aljabo A, Strange A, et al. Demineralization-remineralization dynamics in teeth and bone. Int J Nanomedicine 2016;11:4743–4763. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S107624.
  2. Raghu TN, Ananthakrishna S. Remineralization potential of calcium sucrose phosphate on demineralized enamel: results of an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2016;8(6):704–708. DOI: 10.2047/jioh- 08-06-12.
  3. Rao A, Malhotra N. The role of remineralizing agents in dentistry: a review. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32(6):26–33. PMID: 21894873.
  4. Chole D, Jadhav Y, Kundoor S, et al. Remineralizing agents: minimal invasive therapy a review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2016;15(2):64–68. Available from:
  5. Raksha B, Mithra H. An overview on remineralizing agents. Indian J Appl Res 2015;6(1):331–336. DOI: 10.36106/ijar.
  6. Karlinsey RL, Mackey AC, Stookey GK, et al. In vitro assessments of experimental NaF dentifrices containing a prospective calcium phosphate technology. Am J Dent 2009;22(3):180–184. PMID: 19650601.
  7. Hara A, Zero D. The caries environment: saliva, pellicle, diet, and hard tissue ultrastructure. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54(3):455–467. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.008.
  8. Kamath P, Nayak R, Kamath SU, et al. A comparative evaluation of the remineralization potential of three commercially available remineralizing agents on white spot lesions in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2017;35(3):229–237. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_242_16.
  9. Patil N, Choudhari S, Kulkarni S, et al. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of three agents on artificially demineralized human enamel: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2013;16(2):116–120. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.108185.
  10. Thimmaiah C, Shetty P, Shetty SB, et al. Comparative analysis of the remineralization potential of CPP–ACP with fluoride, tri-calcium phosphate and nano hydroxyapatite using SEM/EDX–an in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11(12):e1120–e1126. DOI: 10.4317/jced.55941.
  11. Featherstone JD. The continuum of dental caries-evidence for a dynamic disease process. J Dent Res 2004;83(Spec No C):C39–C42. DOI: 10.1177/154405910408301s08.
  12. Rajendran R, Kunjusankaran RN, Sandhya R, et al. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of a paste containing bioactive glass and a topical cream containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate: an in vitro study. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr 2019;19:e4668. DOI: 10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.61.
  13. Elsayad I, Sakr A, Badr Y. Combining casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate with fluoride: Synergistic remineralization potential of artificially demineralized enamel or not? J Biomed Opt 2009;14(4):044039. DOI: 10.1117/1. 3210780.
  14. Rathi N, Baid R, Baliga S, et al. Comparative evaluation of nano-hydroxyapatite preparation and calcium sucrose phosphate on microhardness of deciduous teeth after iron drop exposure–an in-vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(4):579–583. DOI: 10.4317/jced.53677.
  15. Menon LU, Varma RB, Kumaran P, et al. Efficacy of a calcium sucrose phosphate based toothpaste in elevating the level of calcium, phosphate ions in saliva and reducing plaque: a clinical trial. Contemp Clin Dent 2018;9(2):151–157. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_562_17.
  16. Kaur G, Sanap AU, Aggarwal SD, et al. Comparative evaluation of two different remineralizing agents on the microhardness of bleached enamel surface: results of an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2015;26(2):176–179. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.159154.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.