The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Socket-shield Technique: A Systematic (Scoping) Review of Case Series and Case Reports

Fuad A Al-Sanabani, Nazim H Abidi, Manea M Al-Ahmari, Nasser S Alhashim, Abdlelah A Daghriri, Bandar A Al-Makramani, Mohammed M Al Moaleem

Keywords : Esthetic, Bone preservation, Bone regeneration, Dental implants, Immediate implant, Socket-shield technique

Citation Information : Al-Sanabani FA, Abidi NH, Al-Ahmari MM, Alhashim NS, Daghriri AA, Al-Makramani BA, Moaleem MM. Socket-shield Technique: A Systematic (Scoping) Review of Case Series and Case Reports. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (11):1314-1326.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3196

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 24-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim: The present study is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the socket-shield technique (SST) and immediate implant placement (IIP) as the treatment of choice for the stabilization of soft and hard tissues at the extraction site and correlate with patient-related and implant-related factors. Methodology: An electronic search was performed on Cochrane, EBSCO host, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Wiley Library, Google website search, and Web of Science databases from January 2010 to September 2021. The search terms used were “socket-shield technique,” “modified SST,” “root membrane technique,” “pontic shield technique,” and “immediate implant.” Case report and case series, both retrospective and prospective in nature, where SST procedures were done with IIP after tooth extraction were considered for the study. However, clinical trials on animals and studies with less than 3-month follow-up after implant placement were not considered for the study. The studies were collected, analyzed, and tabulated for further analysis to evaluate the aim and objectives of the study. Results: Preliminary search identified through databases resulted in 350 articles, which on further screening led to exclusion of 299 articles based on the selection criteria. Therefore, 51 articles were considered for the final analysis which comprised 11 case studies and 40 case reports. With a wide age-group, the maxillary anterior region was the site of choice for the SST with IIP when compared to the posterior region. Better adaptability, maintenance of ridge contour, and good success rate followed by limited complications were observed among case series and reports. Conclusion: SST was successful in providing stability, esthetics, with lesser marginal bone loss and higher pink esthetic scores. However, well-designed prospective case series are few in number; thereby insufficient data on its reliability and longtime stability limit its application. Clinical significance: SST provides a promising result and better esthetic outcome with minimal requirement of soft tissue grafts, thereby increasing its popularity and its application. However, further studies with a larger sample size and effective clinical research designs with a follow-up period are a requirement to establish the procedure and its reliability.

  1. Abadzhiev M, Nenkov P, Velcheva P. Conventional immediate implant placement and immediate placement with socket-shield technique– which is better. Int J Clin Med Res 2014;1(5):176–180.
  2. Glocker M, Attin T, Schmidlin PR. Ridge preservation with modified “socket-shield” technique: a methodological case series. Dent J 2014;2(1):11–21. DOI: 10.3390/dj2010011.
  3. Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al. Socket-shield technique for immediate implant placement – clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28(11):1450–1458. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13012.
  4. Nguyen VG, Flanagan D, Syrbu J, et al. Socket-shield technique used in conjunction with immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a case series. Clin Adv Periodont 2020;10(2):64–68. DOI: 10.1002/cap.10087.
  5. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, et al. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32(6):645–652. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x.
  6. Salama M, Du Toit DJ. Partial extraction therapies (PET) part 1: maintaining alveolar ridge contour at pontic and immediate implant sites. Periodontics 2016;36(5):681–687. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2783.
  7. Capelli M, Testori T, Galli F, et al. Implant–buccal plate distance as diagnostic parameter: a prospective cohort study on implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. J Periodontol 2013;84(12):1768–1774. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.120474.
  8. Araújo M, Linder E, Wennström J, et al. The influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28(2):125. PMID: 18546808.
  9. Araújo M, Linder E, Lindhe J. Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: an experimental study in dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(1):1–6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01606.x.
  10. Mitsias ME, Siormpas KD, Kotsakis GA, et al. The root membrane technique: human histologic evidence after five years of function. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7269467.
  11. Hürzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, et al. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37(9):855–862. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x.
  12. Du Toit J. The pontic-shield: partial extraction therapy for ridge preservation and pontic site development. Periodontics 2016;36(3):417–423. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2651.
  13. Walid AJ. Socket-shield technique–a new approach of immediate implant articles review. J Dent Oral Implants 2019;2(2):6. DOI: 10.14302/issn.2473-1005.jdoi-18-583.
  14. Germi AS, Barghi VG, Jafari K, et al. Aesthetics outcome of immediately restored single implants placed in extraction sockets in the anterior maxilla: a case series study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2020;14(1):48. DOI: 10.34172/joddd.2020.007.
  15. Mathew L, Manjunath N, Anagha NP, et al. Comparative evaluation of socket-shield and immediate implant placement. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol 2020;5(4):1364–1369.
  16. Ogawa T, Sitalaksmi RM, Miyashita M, et al. Effectiveness of the socket-shield technique in dental implant: a systematic review. J Prosthodont Res 2021:JPR_D_20_00054. DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00054.
  17. Habashneh RA, Walid MA, Abualteen T, et al. Socket-shield technique and immediate implant placement for ridge preservation: case report series with 1-year follow-up. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(9):1108–1117. PMID: 31797838.
  18. Mourya A, Mishra SK, Gaddale R, et al. Socket-shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: a systematic review. J Investig Clin Dent 2019;10(4):e12449. DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12449.
  19. Zuhr O, Staehler P, Huerzeler M. Complication management of a socket-shield case after 6 years of function. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2020;40(3):409. DOI: 10.11607/prd.4648.
  20. Aslan S. Improved volume and contour stability with thin socket-shield preparation in immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone. Int J Esthet Dent 2018;13(2):172–183. PMID: 29687096.
  21. Huang H, Shu L, Liu Y, et al. Immediate implant combined with modified socket-shield technique: a case letter. J Oral Implantol 2017;43(2):139–143. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00107.
  22. Cherel F, Etienne D. Papilla preservation between two implants: a modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy? A case report. Quintessence Int 2014;45(1):23–30. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a30765.
  23. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Proximal socket-shield for interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33(1). DOI: 10.11607/prd.1346.
  24. Zhu YB, Qiu LX, Chen L, et al. Clinical evaluation of socket-shield technique in maxillary anterior region. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2018;53(10):665–668. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2018.10.004.
  25. de Oliveira GB, de Almeida Basilio M, Araujo NS, et al. The socket-shield technique and early implant placement for tooth rehabilitation: a case report. J Clin Images Med Case Rep 2021;2(3):1118. DOI: 10.52768/2766-7820/1118.
  26. Alone N, and Niswade G. Clinical application of the socket-shield concept for immediate implant placement–a case report. J Res Med Dent Sci 2021;9(6):36–40.
  27. Srivastava PA, Kusum CK, Aggarwal S, et al. Immediate esthetic restoration of failed teeth in esthetic zone using socket-shield technique: a case report. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2021;7(2):374–376. DOI: 10.22271/oral.2021.v7.i2f.1234.
  28. Alshammari NM, Alhawiti IA, Koshak H. Socket-shield technique for optimizing aesthetic results of immediate implants. IP Int J Periodontol Implantol 2020;5(1):29–32. DOI: 10.18231/j.ijpi.2020.007.
  29. Ganz SD, Tawil I. Guided applications for partial extraction therapy. Dentistry Today 2020. Available from:
  30. Lagas LJ, Pepplinkhuizen JJFAA, Bergé SJ, et al. Implant placement in the aesthetic zone: the socket-shield-technique. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2015;122(1):33–36. DOI: 10.5177/ntvt.2015.01.14180.
  31. Troiano M, Benincasa M, Sánchez P, et al. Bundle bone preservation with Root-T-Belt: case study. Ann Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;2(1):7.
  32. Arora H, Ivanovski S. Evaluation of the influence of implant placement timing on the esthetic outcomes of single tooth implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: a retrospective study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30(4):338–345. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12385.
  33. Gluckman H, Toit JD, Salama M, et al. A decade of the socket-shield technique: a step-by-step partial extraction therapy protocol. Int J Esthet Dent 2020;15(2):212–225. PMID: 32467949.
  34. Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the aesthetic zone and posterior sites: partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20(2):122–129. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12554.
  35. Dash S, Mohapatra A, Srivastava G, et al. Retaining and regaining esthetics in the anterior maxillary region using the socket-shield technique. Contemp Clin Dent 2020;11(2):158–161. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_16_20.
  36. Saeidi Pour R, Zuhr O, Hürzeler M, et al. Clinical benefits of the immediate implant socket-shield technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29(2):93–101. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12291.
  37. Schwimer CW, Gluckman H, Salama M, et al. The socket-shield technique at molar sites: a proof-of-principle technique report. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121(2):229–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.006.
  38. Bin Z, Lihua S, Junhua Z, et al. Short-term effect comparison of a modified socket-shield technique and conventional flapless immediate implant and immediate restoration in maxillary aesthetic area. Chin J Tissue Eng Res 2020;24(34):5514–5519. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2344.
  39. Velasco Bohórquez P, Rucco R, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, et al. Failure rate, marginal bone loss, and pink esthetic with socket-shield technique for immediate dental implant placement in the esthetic zone. a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biology 2021;10(6):549. DOI: 10.3390/biology10060549.
  40. Kumar PR, Kher U. Shield the socket: procedure, case report and classification. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2018;22(3):266–272. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_78_18.
  41. Verma N, Lata J, Kaur J. Socket-shield technique–a new approach to immediate implant placement. Indian J Compr Dent Care 2018;8: 1181–1183.
  42. Fonseca DL. Incorporating the socket-shield technique in the esthetic treatment of a patient's smile: a case report with 2-year follow-up. Int J Growth Factors Stem Cells Dent 2018;1(1):38–41. DOI: 10.4103/GFSC.GFSC_1_18.
  43. Schwimer C, Pette GA, Gluckman H, et al. Human histologic evidence of new bone formation and osseointegration between root dentin (unplanned socket-shield) and dental implant: case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33(1):e19–e23. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6215.
  44. Patel S, Parikh H, Kumar BB, et al. Socket-shield technique, a novel approach for the esthetic rehabilitation of edentulous maxillary anterior alveolar ridges: a special case file. J Dent Implant 2019;9(2):91–94. DOI: 10.4103/jdi.jdi_23_19.
  45. Polis-Yanes C, Cadenas-Sebastián C, Oliver-Puigdomenech C, et al. A double case: socket-shield and pontic shield techniques on aesthetic zone. Case Rep Dent 2020. Article ID 8891772, 6 p. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8891772.
  46. Al Dary H, Al Hadidi A. The socket-shield technique using bone trephine: a case report. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci 2015;1–5. DOI: 10.19070/2377-8075-SI05001.
  47. Chen C-L, Pan Y-H. Socket-shield technique for ridge preservation: a case report. J Prosthodont Implantol 2013;2(2):16–21.
  48. Arabbi KC, Sharanappa M, Priya Y, et al. Socket-shield: a case report. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019;11(Suppl. 1):S72–S75. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_228_18.
  49. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6(7):e1000097. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
  50. Blaschke C, Schwass DR. The socketshield technique: a critical literature review. Int J Implant Dent 2020;6:52. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-020-00246-2.
  51. Magadmi RM. Assessing the clinical improvement in patients with COVID-19 using Lopinavir-Ritonavir: a systematic review. J Pharmaceut Res Int 2021;33(44A):448–459. Article No: JPRI.74217. DOI: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i44A32637.
  52. Guo T, Nie R, Xin X, et al. Tissue preservation through socket-shield technique and platelet-rich fibrin in immediate implant placement: a case report. Medicine 2018;97(50):e1375. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013175.
  53. Mattar AA. Socket-shield technique with immediate implant placement to preserve thin buccal bone: a case report. Int J Dent Oral Heal 2018;4(8):117–122.
  54. Esteve-Pardo G, Esteve-Colomina L. Clinical application of the socket-shield concept in multiple anterior teeth. Case Rep Dent 2018;2018:1–7. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9014372.
  55. Gluckman H, Toit JD, Salama M. The socket-shield technique to support the buccofacial tissues at immediate implant placement. Int Dent – Afr Ed 2018;5(3).
  56. Dayakar MM, Waheed A, Bhat HS, et al. The socketshield technique and immediate implant placement. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2018;22(5):451–455. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_240_18.
  57. Nevins M, Parma-Benfenati S, Sava C, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluations of immediately placed SLA dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018;38(2):165–170. DOI: 10.11607/prd.3558.32.
  58. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, et al. Implant placement post extraction in aesthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontology 2000 2017;73(1):84–102. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12170.
  59. Durrani F, Yadav DS, Galohda A, et al. Dimensional changes in periodontium with immediate replacement of tooth by socket-shield technique: two-year follow-up. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res 2017;8(1):17–21. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1161.
  60. Al-Dary H, Alsayed A. The socket-shield technique: a case report with 5 years follow up. EC Dent Sci 2017;15.5:168–181.
  61. Roe P, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K. Residual root preparation for socket-shield procedures: a facial window approach. IJ Esthet Dent 2017;12(3):324–335. PMID: 28717791.
  62. Petsch M, Spies B, Kohal RJ. Socket-shield technique for implant placement in the esthetic zone: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2017;37(6):853–860. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2729.
  63. Pour RS, Zuhr O, Hurzeler M, et al. Clinical benefits of the immediate implant socket-shield technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29(2):93–101. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12291.
  64. Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment – a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17(1):71–82. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12076.
  65. Shaheen RS. Partial extraction therapy: a review of the clinical and histological human studies. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res 2021;8(1):16–19. DOI: 10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_2_21.
  66. Goel M, Kanade M, Meshram R, et al. Immediate implant placement with socket-shield technique and root submergence of the adjacent tooth – a case report. Eur J Mol Clin Med 2020;7(10):3570.
  67. Siormpas KD, Mitsias ME, Kotsakis GA, et al. The root membrane technique: a retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up. Implant Dent 2018;27(5):1–11. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000818.
  68. Han CH, Park KB, Mangano FG. The modified socket-shield technique. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29(8):2247–2254. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004494.
  69. Mangano FG, Luongo F, Picciocchi G, et al. Soft tissue stability around single implants inserted to replace maxillary lateral incisors: a 3D evaluation. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:9393219. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9393219.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.