The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Spectrophotometric Analysis of Different Flowable Restorative Materials

Abeer E ElEmbaby, Mouneir Slais, Ali Alawami, Mohammed Alabbad, Mishari Alsowyan, Neveen Hanna, Hala Bahgat

Keywords : Color change, Flowable composites, Staining solutions

Citation Information : ElEmbaby AE, Slais M, Alawami A, Alabbad M, Alsowyan M, Hanna N, Bahgat H. Spectrophotometric Analysis of Different Flowable Restorative Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (2):111-116.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3031

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 17-12-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To compare the color change of three flowable composites after exposure to staining solutions. Materials and methods: A total of 240 oval samples were constructed of conventional flowable resin composite, self-adhesive flowable resin composite, and nanohybrid flowable ormocer (n = 80). Each set was further subcategorized into three subsets as regards staining solution. The baseline color parameters were recorded using spectrophotometer after the immersion of the specimens in artificial saliva for 24 hours. Then, the measurements were taken again after exposure to staining solutions where the color change was measured as ∆E* = √ (∆L*2 + ∆a*2 + ∆b*2). Results: Conventional flowable resin composite had the best color stability in all staining solutions. The coffee was concluded to be the most staining solution. Compared to beverages, mouthwashes had a greater discoloration effect on nanohybrid flowable ormocer than on self-adhesive flowable composite. Conclusion: Conventional flowable composite had the highest color stability among the tested materials, followed by flowable nanohybrid ormocer, and the least was self-adhering flowable composite. Coffee had the greatest discoloration effect, followed by a sports drink and then the energy drink. However, mouthwashes did not have a significant discoloration effect. Clinical significance: Selection of flowable composite materials that are resistant to staining by coffee, beverages, or mouthwashes is an important factor that may influence the sustainability of the esthetic quality of the restoration.

HTML PDF Share
  1. Arregui M, Giner L, Ferrari M, et al. Six-month color change and water sorption of nine new-generation flowable composites in 6 staining solutions. Braz Oral Res 2016;30(1):e123. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0123.
  2. Miyagawa Y, Powers JM, O’Brien WJ. Optical properties of direct restorative materials. J Dent Res 1981;60:890–894. DOI: 10.1177/00220345810600050601.
  3. Hegde MN, Hegde P, Chandra CR. Morphological evaluation of new total etching and self-etching adhesive system interfaces with dentin. J Conserv Dent 2012;15(2):151–155. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.94589.
  4. Eliades G, Vougiouklakis G, Palaghias G. Heterogeneous distribution of single-bottle adhesive monomers in the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. Dent Mater 2001;17(4):277–283. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00082-8.
  5. Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Kouros P, Koumpia E, et al. Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems. Braz J Oral Sci 2014;13(1):64–69. DOI: 10.1590/1677-3225v13n1a13.
  6. Sadeghi M. An in vitro microleakage study of Class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9(4):460–465. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.102784.
  7. Bektas OO, Eren D, Akin EG, et al. Evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite in terms of micro-shear bond strength and micro leakage. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71(3–4):541–546. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2012.696697.
  8. Vichi A, Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, et al. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in Class I restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17(6):1497–1506. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6.
  9. Llena C, Fernández S, Forner L. Color stability of nanohybrid resin-based composites, ormocers and compomers. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1071–1077. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1850-z.
  10. ElEmbaby AE-S. The effects of mouth rinses on the color stability of resin-based restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26(4):264–271. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12061.
  11. Gürdal P, Güniz B, Akdeniz, et al. The effects of mouth rinses on microhardness and color. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:895–901. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00924.x.
  12. Poggio C, Ceci M, Beltrami R, et al. Color stability of esthetic restorative materials: a spectrophotometric analysis. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2016;2(1):95–101. DOI: 10.1080/23337931.2016.1217416.
  13. Lang NP, Tan WC, Krahenmann MA, et al. A systematic review product of the effects of full-mouth debridement with and without antiseptics in patients with chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:8–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01257.x.
  14. Fischman SL. A clinician's perspective on antimicrobial mouth rinses. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:20–22. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8177(94)14003-3 .
  15. Yazici AR, Celik C, Dayangac B, et al. The effect of curing units and staining solutions on the color stability of resin composites. Oper Dent 2007;32:616–622. DOI: 10.2341/07-3.
  16. Celik C, Yuzugullu B, Erkut S, et al. Effects of mouth rinses on color stability of resin composites. Eur J Dent 2008;2:247–253. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697388.
  17. Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, et al. Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins—An in vitro study. J Dent 2010;38:137–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.020.
  18. Mundim FM, Garcia LDFR, Pires-De-Souza FDCP. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18(3):249–254. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000300009.
  19. Bagheri R, Burrow M, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent 2005;33(5):389–398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.018.
  20. Ertas E, Güler AU, Yücel AC, et al. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater J 2006;25:371–376. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.25.371.
  21. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, et al. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study. Dent Mater 1994;10:353–362. DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90059-0.
  22. Lee YK, Powers JM. Discoloration of dental resin composites after immersion in a series of organic and chemical solutions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;73:361–367. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30216.
  23. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007;28:3757–3785. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044.
  24. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, et al. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2002;15:193–197. PMID: 12469758.
  25. Alzraikat H, Burrow MF, Maghaireh GA, et al. Nanofilled resin composite properties and clinical performance. A review. Oper Dent 2018;43:173–190. DOI: 10.2341/17-208-T.
  26. Kheraif AA. Effects of curing units and the staining solutions on the color susceptibility of a microhybrid composite resin. J Dent Sci 2011;6:33–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2011.02.006
  27. Moszner N, Gianasmidis A, Klapdohr S, et al. Sol–gel materials 2. Light-curing dental composites based on ormocers of cross-linking alkoxysilane methacrylates and further nanocomponents. Dent Mater 2008;24:851–856. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.10.004.
  28. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003;24:655–665. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00380-0.
  29. Kalra S, Singh A, Gupta M, et al. Ormocer: an aesthetic direct restorative material; an in vitro study comparing the marginal sealing ability of organically modified ceramics and a hybrid composite using an ormocer-based bonding agent and a conventional fifth-generation bonding agent. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3:48–53. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.94546.
  30. Malhotra N, Shenoy RP, Acharya S, et al. Effect of three indigenous food stains on resin-based, microhybrid-, and nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23:250–257. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00431.x.
  31. Omata Y, Uno S, Nakaoki Y, et al. Staining of hybrid composites with coffee, oolong tea, or red wine. Dent Mater J 2006; 25:125–131. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.25.125.
  32. Soares-Geraldo D, Scaramucci T, Steagall Jr W, et al. Interaction between staining and degradation of a composite resin in contact with colored foods. Braz Oral Res 2011;25:369–375. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242011000400015.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.