The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effect of Twin-block Appliance on Pharyngeal Airway, Sleep Patterns, and Lung Volume in Children with Class II Malocclusion

Akriti Batra, Vabitha Shetty

Keywords : Class II malocclusion, Lung volume, Pharyngeal airway, Sleep-disordered breathing, Twin block

Citation Information : Batra A, Shetty V. Effect of Twin-block Appliance on Pharyngeal Airway, Sleep Patterns, and Lung Volume in Children with Class II Malocclusion. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (1):66-73.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3289

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 21-05-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: In this study, we sought to evaluate the effect of the twin-block appliance on pharyngeal airway dimensions, sleep patterns, and lung volumes in growing children with class II malocclusion with a retrognathic mandible. Materials and methods: Twenty children aged 9–12 years with class II malocclusion with a retrognathic mandible participated in the study. A validated sleep questionnaire assessed the sleep patterns and the sleep problems of the children. The pre-treatment cephalometric variables and the pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) dimensions were analyzed. Spirometry tests were performed to evaluate lung volumes. A custom-made twin-block appliance was fabricated, and children were instructed to wear it for a minimum of 10 months. All variables including sleep problems, cephalometric variables, and pharyngeal airway measurements were evaluated post-treatment. Spirometry tests were re-evaluated at the end of the twin-block treatment. All data were statistically analyzed. Results: Post-twin-block appliance treatment, there was a definite decrease in snoring, noisy breathing, and sleeping with mouth open. The sella-nasion to B point angle (SNB), mandibular length, the depths of oropharynx, nasopharynx, and hypopharynx as well as the height of nasopharynx (HNP) were significantly increased post-treatment (p <0.001). The length and thickness of soft palate (SPI) increased significantly (p <0.001), while its inclination decreased significantly (p <0.001). We found improvements in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1); however, the changes were statistically not significant (p = 0.88 and p = 0.78). Conclusion: Twin-block appliance significantly increased the pharyngeal airway dimensions and improved the length and thickness of the soft palate in children with class II malocclusion. Post-twin-block treatment showed a considerable reduction in the sleep problems of the children. The lung volume measurements showed improvement; however, it was not statistically significant. Clinical significance: Twin block may be used not only to correct the facial disharmony of children with a retrognathic mandible but also to improve the airway dimensions and lung volume as well as to reduce the sleep-disordered symptoms.


PDF Share
  1. Carroll JL. Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing in children: new controversies, new directions. Clin Chest Med 2003;24(2):261–282. PMID: 12800783.
  2. Marcus CL, Brooks LJ, Ward SD, et al. Diagnosis and management of childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Pediatrics 2012;130(3):e714–e755. PMID: 22926176.
  3. Katyal V, Kennedy D, Martin J, et al. Paediatric sleep-disordered breathing due to upper airway obstruction in the orthodontic setting: a review. Aust Orthod J 2013;29(2):184–192. PMID: 24380139.
  4. Korayem MM, Witmans M, MacLean J, et al. Craniofacial morphology in pediatric patients with persistent obstructive sleep apnea with or without positive airway pressure therapy: a cross-sectional comparison with controls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144(1):78–85. PMID: 23810049.
  5. Pirilä-Parkkinen K, Lopponen H, Nieminen P, et al. Cephalometric evaluation of children with nocturnal sleep disordered breathing. Eur J Orthod 2010;32(6):662–671. PMID: 20305055.
  6. Katyal V, Pamula Y, Martin AJ, et al. Craniofacial and upper airway morphology in Paediatric sleep-disordered breathing and changes in quality of life with rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143(1):20–30. PMID: 23273357.
  7. Huynh NT, Morton PD, Rompre PH, et al. Associations between sleep-disordered breathing symptoms and facial and dental morphometry, assessed with screening examinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140(6):762–770. PMID: 22133940.
  8. Li L, Liu H, Cheng H, et al. CBCT evaluation of the upper airway morphological changes in growing patients of class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular retrusion using twin-block appliance: a comparative research. PloS one 2014;9(4):e94378. PMID: 24705466.
  9. Ghodke S, Utreja AK, Singh SP, et al. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects. Progress Orthod 2014;15(1):1–8. PMID: 25534004.
  10. Mageet AO, McDonald JP. Effect of mandibular repositioning appliances on inspiratory and expiratory total air. Appl Clin Res Clin Trials Regul Affairs 2014;1:1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/22134-76X01666141001220742.
  11. Mageet AO, Khamis AH, McDonald JP. Effect of mandibular repositioning appliances on nasal resistance of a sample of obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome patients. Intl J Scientific Res 2015;4(1):3–6.
  12. Pupneja P, Utreja A, Singh S, et al. Effects of twin-block appliance treatment on pulmonary functions in class II malocclusion subjects with retrognathic mandibles. J Orthod Endod 2015;1(6):1–5.
  13. Yerra A, Shetty V. Prevalence of sleep practices and sleep problems of schoolchildren in South Kanara. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2021;39(3):251–256. DOI: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_433_20.
  14. Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK. Effectiveness of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal passage dimensions in class II malocclusion subjects with retrognathic mandible. Angle Orthod 2013;83(4):728–734. PMID: 23241007.
  15. Joseph AA, Elbaum J, Cisneros GJ, et al. A cephalometric comparative study of the soft tissue airway dimensions in persons with hyperdivergent and normodivergent facial patterns. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56(2):135–139. PMID: 9461134.
  16. Kuzniar TJ, Kasibowska-Kuzniar K. Sleep disordered breathing. Dis Mon 2011;57:394–402. PMID: 21929963.
  17. Lee RT, Barnes E, Dibiase A, et al. An extended period of functional appliance therapy: a controlled clinical trial comparing the twin-block and Dynamax appliances. Eur J Orthod 2014;36(5):512–521. PMID: 23291502.
  18. Clark WJ. Twin Blocks designed for 24-hour wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;156(3):295. PMID: 31474252.
  19. Ozbek MM, Memikoglu TU, Gögen H, et al. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopaedic treatment in skeletal class II cases. Angle Orthod 1998;68(4):327–336. PMID: 9709833.
  20. Mahamad IK, Neela PK, Mascarenhas R, et al. A comparison of twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance: a cephalometric study. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 2012;23(3):49–58. PMID: 23094559.
  21. Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of twin-block and bionator appliance in the treatment of class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130(5):594–602. PMID: 17110256.
  22. Liu Y, Park YC, Lowe AA, et al. Supine cephalometric analyses of an adjustable oral appliance used in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 2000;4(2):59–66. PMID: 11868121.
  23. Mohamed RN, Basha S, Al-Thomali Y. Changes in upper airway dimensions following orthodontic treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with twin-block appliance: a systematic review. Turk J Orthod 2020;33(1):59–64. PMID: 32284900.
  24. Suratt PM, Dee P, Atkinson RL, et al. Fluoroscopic and computed tomographic features of the pharyngeal airway in obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;127(4):487–492. PMID: 6838055.
  25. Zha D, Qiao L, Ge Y, et al. The MRI study of upper airway on obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2008;22(13):593–596. PMID: 18839877.
  26. Malkoc S, Usumez S, Nur M, et al. Reproducibility of airway dimensions and tongue and hyoid positions on lateral cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128(4):513–516. PMID: 16214635.
  27. Li L, Wu W, Yan G, et al. Analogue simulation of pharyngeal airflow response to twin-block treatment in growing patients with Class II 1 and mandibular retrognathia. Sci Rep 2016;6(1):1–7. PMID: 27188799.
  28. Maspero C, Giannini L, Galbiati G, et al. Upper airway obstruction in class II patients: effects of Andresen activator on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage: cone beam evaluation. Stomatologija 2015;17(4):124–130. PMID: 27189498.
  29. Liu X, Liu L, Wang R. Bed sharing, sleep habits, and sleep problems among Chinese school-aged children. Sleep 2003;26(7): 839–844. PMID: 14655917.
  30. Latz S, Wolf AW, Lozoff B. Co-sleeping in context: sleep practices and problems in young children in Japan and the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1;153(4):339–346. PMID: 10201715.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.