The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2022 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Root Membrane Concept: Shield the Socket—A Case Report

Sathish Rajendran, Sruthi Srinivasan, Jaideep Mahendra, Little Mahendra, Harisha Dewan, Zeeshan H Ahmed, Hosam A Baeshen, Saranya Varadarajan, Shilpa Bhandi

Keywords : Anterior zone, Esthetics, Immediate implants, Implant, Missing teeth, Root membrane technique, Socket shield

Citation Information : Rajendran S, Srinivasan S, Mahendra J, Mahendra L, Dewan H, Ahmed ZH, Baeshen HA, Varadarajan S, Bhandi S. Root Membrane Concept: Shield the Socket—A Case Report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (1):100-104.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3261

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 21-05-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Edentulousness affects the mental health of most patients. Missing teeth in the anterior esthetic zones is a matter of concern, especially for young adults. Various replacement options such as fixed partial dentures, removable partial dentures, and dental implants are available to treat edentulousness. Dental implants have been a booming treatment option in modern-day dentistry as they more closely mimic the natural tooth. The most important criterion for placement of the implant in the esthetic zone is the conservation of alveolar bone, especially in the anterior region which is usually compromised due to tooth extraction or resorption of the ridge. The root membrane concept or the socket shield technique is a recently introduced concept in implant dentistry where a portion of the root acts as a shield to protect against alveolar bone resorption and maintain bone integrity, especially in the esthetic area. This case report describes the clinical management of fractured upper anterior teeth using a dental implant and the root membrane technique.


PDF Share
  1. Becker W, Hujoel P, Becker BE, et al. Dental implants in an aged population: evaluation of periodontal health, bone loss, implant survival, and quality of life. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18(3): 473–479. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12340.
  2. Becker W, Hujoel P, Becker BE, et al. Survival rates and bone level changes around porous oxide-coated implants (TiUnite™). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15(5):654–660. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12106.
  3. Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000 2017;73(1):7–21. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12185.
  4. Mangano FG, Mastrangelo P, Luongo F, et al. Aesthetic outcome of immediately restored single implants placed in extraction sockets and healed sites of the anterior maxilla: a retrospective study on 103 patients with 3 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28(3):272–282. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12795.
  5. Yao J, Tang H, Gao XL, et al. Patients’ expectations to a dental implant: a systematic review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014;12:153. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-014-0153-9.
  6. Kotsakis GA, Salama M, Chrepa V, et al. A randomized, blinded, controlled clinical study of particulate anorganic bovine bone mineral and calcium phosphosilicate putty bone substitutes for socket preservation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29(1):141–151. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3230.
  7. Covani U, Ricci M, Bozzolo G, et al. Analysis of the pattern of the alveolar ridge remodelling following single tooth extraction. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(8):820–825. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02060.x.
  8. Lee AMH, Poon CY. The clinical effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation in the maxillary anterior esthetic zone – a retrospective study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29(2):137–145. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12280.
  9. Cosyn J, Pollaris L, Van der Linden F, et al. Minimally Invasive Single Implant Treatment (M.I.S.I.T.) based on ridge preservation and contour augmentation in patients with a high aesthetic risk profile: one-year results. J Clin Periodontol 2015;42(4):398–405. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12384.
  10. Karaca Ç, Er N, Gülşahı A, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation with a free gingival graft in the anterior maxilla: volumetric evaluation in a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44(6):774–780. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.01.015.
  11. Cooper LF, Reside G, Raes F, et al. Immediate provisionalization of dental implants in grafted alveolar ridges in the esthetic zone: a 5-year evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34(4): 477–486. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2022.
  12. Mangano FG, Zecca P, Luongo F, et al. Single-tooth morse taper connection implant placed in grafted site of the anterior maxilla: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Case Rep Dent 2014;2014:183872. DOI: 10.1155/2014/183872.
  13. Hürzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, et al. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37(9):855–862. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x.
  14. Glocker M, Attin T, Schmidlin P. Ridge preservation with modified “socket-shield” technique: a methodological case series. Dent J 2014;2:11–21. DOI: 10.3390/dj2010011.
  15. Singh G, Gupta A, Quadri S. A new approch for ridge preservation: socket shield technique: a review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci e-ISSN 2017;16(10):94–95. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1610089495.
  16. Ganz S, Tawil I, Mitsias M. The root membrane concept: in the zone with the “triangle of bone.” Dent Today 2017;36:80.
  17. Siormpas KD, Mitsias ME, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, et al. Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone utilizing the “root-membrane” technique: clinical results up to 5 years postloading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29(6):1397–1405. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3707.
  18. Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, et al. Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn? Periodontol 2000 2015;68(1):122–134. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12082.
  19. Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, et al. Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: a 3D analysis with CBCT. J Dent Res 2013;92(12 Suppl):195S–201S. DOI: 10.1177/0022034513506713.
  20. Abadzhiev M, Nenkov P, Velcheva P. Conventional immediate implant placement and immediate placement with socket-shield technique—which is better. Int J Clin Med Res Int J Clin Med Res 2014;1(5):176–180. http://www.aascit.org/journal/ijcmr.
  21. Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al. Socket shield technique for immediate implant placement – clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28(11):1450–1458. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13012.
  22. Lee CT, Chiu TS, Chuang SK, et al. Alterations of the bone dimension following immediate implant placement into extraction socket: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2014;41(9):914–926. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12276.
  23. Helsham RW. Some observations on the subject of roots of teeth retained in the jaws as a result of incomplete exodontia. Aust Dent J 1960;5(2):70–77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1960.tb03154.x.
  24. Wong KM, Chneh CM, Ang CW. Modified root submergence technique for multiple implant-supported maxillary anterior restorations in a patient with thin gingival biotype: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107(6):349–352. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)00071-6.
  25. Comut A, Mehra M, Saito H. Pontic site development with a root submergence technique for a screw-retained prosthesis in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110(5):337–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.009.
  26. Choi S, Yeo IS, Kim SH, et al. A root submergence technique for pontic site development in fixed dental prostheses in the maxillary anterior esthetic zone. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2015;45(4):152–155. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.4.152.
  27. Schwimer C, Pette GA, Gluckman H, et al. Human histologic evidence of new bone formation and osseointegration between root dentin (unplanned socket-shield) and dental implant: case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33(1):e19–e23. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6215.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.