The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2 ( May, 2005 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Cephalometric Evaluation for Saudi Population Using the Downs and Steiner Analysis

Nasser M. Al-Jasser

Citation Information : Al-Jasser NM. Cephalometric Evaluation for Saudi Population Using the Downs and Steiner Analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6 (2):52-63.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-6-2-52

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-05-2005

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2005; The Author(s).


Abstract

Citation

Al-Jasser NM. Cephalometric Evaluation for Saudi Population Using the Downs and Steiner Analysise. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 May;(6)2:052-063.


PDF Share
  1. Principles and practice of orthodontics. Churchill Livingstone, Longman Group Ltd, London, 1982.
  2. Foetus into man, physical growth from conception to maturity. 2nd ed, Castlemead Pub, 1989.
  3. Contemporary orthodontics. 2nd ed, Mosby Co, 1992.
  4. Man's most dangerous myth. The fallacy of Races, New York, Columbia University Press, 1942.
  5. Races: A study of the problems of race formation in man. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1950;65-71.
  6. Cephalometric standards for the Japanese according to Steiner analysis. Am J Orthod. 1968;5670-82.
  7. A determination of cephalometric norms for the Negro race. Am J Orthod. 1968;54:670-82.
  8. Cephalometric standards of Steiner analysis established on Chinese children. J Formosa Med Assoc. 1971;70:97-102.
  9. A comparison of cephalometric norms for the African Bantu and Caucasoid population. Europ J Orthod. 1983;5:223-24.
  10. The integumental profile. Am J Orthod. 1958;44:1-25.
  11. A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:1-28
  12. Cephalometric norms for Saudi boys. The Saudi Dent J. 1990;2:52-57.
  13. Downs analysis applied to three ethnic groups. Angle Orthod. 1951;21:213-20.
  14. Differential diagnosis of American adult male black and white populations using Steiner analysis. Angle Orthod. 1974;44:346-50.
  15. Differential diagnosis of American adult male black and white populations using Steiner analysis. Angle Orthod. 1974;44:346-50.
  16. A textbook of orthodontics. Bristol Wright 1986;188-91.
  17. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:449-69.
  18. Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European- American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;110:431-8.
  19. Normal standards for various cephalometric analysis in Japanese adults. J Jpn Orthod. 1957;16:4-12.
  20. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:1184-1189.
  21. Cephalometric standards for the Southern Chinese. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:264-272.
  22. A cephalometric evaluation of American Negro women. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:152-60.
  23. Orthognathic surgery norms for American black patients. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:119-34.
  24. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial variation in normal Nigerian Negro population. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg. 1982 Abstract.
  25. Adult cephalometric norms for Saudi Arabians with a comparison of values for Saudi and North American Caucasians. Br J Orthod. 1987;14:273-279.
  26. Skeleto-dental characteristic features among Saudi female. School children. A cephalometric study. Thesis 1996.
  27. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod. 1931; 1:45-66.
  28. Cephalometric appraisal of Orthodontic results. Angle Orthod. 1938;8:261-351.
  29. The problems of correction of asymmetric mandibular prognathism. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1974;2:113-119.
  30. Collaboration between orthodontics and maxillofacial surgery in the treatment of dentofacial deformities. Saudi Med J. 1996;1:91-95.
  31. Variations in facial relationship. Their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34:812-40.
  32. Cephalometric for you and me. Am J Orthod. 1953;39:729-54.
  33. Cephalometric evaluation of Mexican Americans using the Downs and Steiner analysis. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:67-74.
  34. The variation in skeletal and denture patterns in excellent adult facial types. Angle Orthod. 1959;29:63-92.
  35. A cephalometric evaluation of the normal skeletal and dental pattern of children with excellent occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1951;21:96-103.
  36. Malocclusion and Facial types in a group of Saudi Arabian patients referred for orthodontic treatment. A preliminary study. Br J Orthod. 1987;14:143-46.
  37. A comparative study between two randomly selected samples from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurements. J Rehab. 1988;15:251-55.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.