The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2 ( May, 2005 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: Part II. Histologic Healing and Clinical Root Coverage

Lawrence G. Breault, Lemuel L. Covington, Barry G. Bishop, Constance L. Sedon

Citation Information : Breault LG, Covington LL, Bishop BG, Sedon CL. The Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: Part II. Histologic Healing and Clinical Root Coverage. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6 (2):139-150.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-6-2-139

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-01-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2005; The Author(s).


Abstract

Citation

Sedon CL, Breault LG, Covington LL, Bishop BG. The Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: Part II. Histologic Healing and Clinical Root Coverage. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 May;(6)2:139-150.

PDF Share
  1. A possible influence of gingival dimensions on attachment loss and gingival recession following placement of artificial crowns. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Oct;23(5):439-45.
  2. Gingival recession in relation to history of hard toothbrush use. J Periodontol 1993;(64):900-5.
  3. Prevalence and etiology of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1967;38:316-22.
  4. The width of keratinized gingival during orthodontic treatment. Its significance and impact on periodontal status. J Periodontol 1981;52:307-313.
  5. Gingival recession in the lower incisor region of 15-year old subjects. J Periodontol 1980;51(2):74-6.
  6. A clinical study of the relationship between crowding of teeth, plaque and gingival condition. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:214-222.
  7. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Feb;134(2):220-5.
  8. The Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: Part I. Patient Selection and Surgical Techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 February;(6)1:146-162.
  9. Human histologic evaluation of root coverage obtained with a connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft. A case report. J Periodontol. 1999 Jul;70(7):813-21.
  10. Successful root coverage: a human histologic evaluation of a case. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Oct;19(5):439-47.
  11. Histology of a human biopsy section following the placement of a subepithelial connective tissue graft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Jun;20(3):225-31.
  12. Clinical and histologic evaluation of human gingival recession treated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain): a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Jun;20(3):269-75.
  13. Human histology of new attachment after root coverage using subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jul;28(7):657-62.
  14. Histology of connective tissue graft. A case report. J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1607-15.
  15. The subpedicle connective tissue graft. A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surfaces. J Periodontol. 1987 Feb;58(2):95-102.
  16. Histological evaluation of 4 cases of root coverage following a connective tissue graft combined with an enamel matrix derivative preparation. J Periodontol. 2002 Dec;73(12):1534-43.
  17. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: Histological evaluation. J Periodontol. 2003 Aug;74(8):1126-35.
  18. The histology of new attachment utilizing a thick autogenous soft tissue graft in an area of deep recession: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1995 Jun;15(3):248-57.
  19. A clinical and histological study of the attachment of grafted tissue to bone and teeth. J Periodontol. 1969 Jul;40(7):381-7.
  20. The effects of citric acid on attachment of laterally positioned flaps. J Periodontol. 1983 Jan;54(1):9-18.
  21. Acellular dermal graft: a human histologic case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Feb;22(1):21-9.
  22. Guided tissue regeneration using a resorbable membrane in gingival recession-type defects: a histologic case report in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998 Feb;18(1):24-33.
  23. Histologic assessment of new attachment following the treatment of a human buccal recession by means of a guided tissue regeneration procedure. J Periodontol. 1993 May;64(5):387-91.
  24. Histologic evaluation of new attachment utilizing a titanium-reinforced barrier membrane in a mucogingival recession defect. A case report. J Periodontol. 1998 Jul;69(7):834-9.
  25. Histologic evaluation of root coverage obtained with GTR in humans: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Jun;21(3):240-51.
  26. Human histologic evaluation of root coverage obtained with a connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft. A case report. J Periodontol. 1999 Jul;70(7):813-21.
  27. Periodontal Therapy, 3rd ed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co.; 1964:560.
  28. Thick gingival autograft for the coverage of gingival recession: a clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1990;10(3):216-29.
  29. Clinical comparison of the free soft tissue autograft and partial thickness apically positioned flap╌preoperative gingival or mucosal margins. J Periodontol. 1975 Oct;46(10):586-95.
  30. The presence of “creeping attachment” in human gingiva. J Periodontol. 1978 Oct;49(10):513-7.
  31. Creeping attachment: autogenous graft vs dermal matrix allograft. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000 Sep;21(9):725-9; quiz 730.
  32. Creeping attachment associated with the connective tissue with partial-thickness double pedicle graft. J Periodontol. 1997 Sep;68(9):890-9.
  33. Root coverage with connective tissue grafts: an evaluation of short- and long-term results. J Periodontol. 2002 Sep;73(9):1054-9.
  34. A 3-year longitudinal evaluation of subpedicle free connective tissue graft forgingival recession coverage. J Periodontol. 2002 Dec;73(12):1412-8.
  35. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the “envelope” technique. J Periodontol. 1985 Jul;56(7):397-402.
  36. The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft: a predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontol. 1992 May;63(5):477-86.
  37. Thick free gingival and connective tissue autografts for root coverage. J Periodontol. 1993 Apr;64(4):315-22.
  38. Use of the supraperiosteal envelope in soft tissue grafting for root coverage. II. Clinical results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994 Aug;14(4):302-15.
  39. Controlled clinical evaluation of the subpedicle connective tissue graft for the coverage of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 1994 Dec;65(12):1107-12.
  40. Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study of 2 procedures. J Periodontol. 1994 Oct;65(10):929-36.
  41. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol. 1985 Dec;56(12):715-20.
  42. Increased gingival dimensions. A significant factor for successful outcome of root coverage procedures? A 2-year prospective clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Aug;23(8):770-7.
  43. Clinical evaluation of tetracycline HCl conditioning in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study. J Periodontol. 1997 Mar;68(3):262-9.
  44. Gingival dimensions after root coverage with free connective tissue grafts. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 May;25(5):424-30.
  45. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions. J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1470-6.
  46. Root coverage and pocket reduction as combined surgical procedures. J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1572-9.
  47. Coverage of previously carious roots is as predictable a procedure as coverage of intact roots. J Periodontol. 2002 Dec;73(12):1419-26.
  48. Connective tissue grafts combined with either double pedicle grafts or coronally positioned pedicle grafts: results of 266 consecutively treated defects in 200 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Oct;22(5):463-71.
  49. Root coverage in molar recession: report of 50 consecutive cases treated with subepithelial connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 2003 May;74(5):703-8.
  50. Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique. Quintessence Int. 2003 Jan;34(1):7-13.
  51. Root coverage using a free soft tissue autograft following citric acid application. Part III. A successful and predictable procedure in areas of deep-wide recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(2):15-37.
  52. Creeping attachment of free gingival grafts. A five-year follow-up study. J Periodontol. 1980 Dec;51(12):681-5.
  53. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Jan;24(1):51-6.
  54. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Dec;22(6):583-93.
  55. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters. J Periodontol. 2003 Aug;74(8):1110-25.
  56. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2004 Mar;75(3):413-9.
  57. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2004 Apr;75(4):600-7.
  58. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1477-84.
  59. Clinical evaluation of acellular allograft dermis for the treatment of human gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001 Aug;72(8):998-1005.
  60. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 2002 Dec;73(12):1405-11.
  61. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study. J Periodontol. 2002 Nov;73(11):1299-307.
  62. A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft. J Periodontol. 2004 May;75(5):734-43.
  63. A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996 Dec;16(6):538-45.
  64. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects. J Periodontol. 1998 Nov;69(11):1271-7.
  65. A comparison of 2 root coverage techniques: guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. results of a series of consecutive cases. J Periodontol. 1998 Dec;69(12):1426-34.
  66. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects. J Periodontol. 1998 Feb;69(2):138-45.
  67. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession. J Periodontol. 1999 Feb;70(2):123-30.
  68. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1441-7.
  69. Gingival recession treatment: guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2000 Feb;71(2):299-307.
  70. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2001 Sep;72(9):1258-64.
  71. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Apr;21(2):171-81.
  72. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001 Oct;72(10):1301-11.
  73. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study. J Periodontol. 2002 Jan;73(1):53-62.
  74. Comparative clinical study of connective tissue graft and two types of bioabsorbable barriers in the treatment of localized gingival recessions. J Periodontol. 2003 Aug;74(8):1196-205.
  75. Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2002:29(Suppl. 3):178-194.
  76. Surgical therapies for the treatment of gingival recession. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):303-20. Review.
  77. The natural history of periodontal disease in man: Prevalence, severity and extent of GR. J Periodontol 1992;63:489-495.
  78. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal recessions. A 4-year follow-up study. J Periodontol. 1996 Nov;67(11):1216-23.
  79. Long-term stability of the mucogingival complex following guided tissueregeneration in gingival recession defects. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Dec;25(12):1041-6.
  80. GTR for root coverage: a long-term follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Feb;22(1):55-61.
  81. Evidence-based mucogingival therapy. Part 1: A critical review of the literature on root coverage procedures. J Periodontol. 2003 May;74(5):709-40.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.