The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 8 ( 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

A Comparative Evaluation of Apical Leakage using Three Root Canal Sealants: An in vitro Study

Punkit S Sudan, Emmanuel P Samson, Maneet K Kukreja, Musfirat Khan, Rajath Misurya, Prabhu M Syed Ismail

Keywords : Endorez, Endoseal, Realseal, Sealant.

Citation Information : Sudan PS, Samson EP, Kukreja MK, Khan M, Misurya R, Ismail PM. A Comparative Evaluation of Apical Leakage using Three Root Canal Sealants: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (8):955-958.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2364

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: Apical leakage is one of the drawbacks leading to endodontic failure. Various root canal sealants have been tried in endodontics. The present study was conducted to compare root canal sealants such as Endorez, Realseal, and Metaseal in preventing apical leakage. Materials and methods: Sixty mandibular single-canal premolars were divided into three groups of 20 each. Group I teeth were sealed with Endorez, group II teeth with Realseal, and group III teeth with Metaseal. After completing endodontic treatment in all teeth and sealing with above sealants, glucose leakage value was assessed at 1st, 8th, and 15th day. Results: At day 1 [mean ± standard deviation (SD)], leakage was 0.416 ± 0.011 in group I, 0.234 ± 0.09 in group II, and 0.328 ± 0.19 in group III. On 8th day, it was 2.124 ± 0.108 in group I, 0.624 ± 0.102 in group II, and 1.31 ± 0.24 in group III. On 15th day, it was 5.178 ± 0.125 in group I, 3.122 ± 0.150 in group II, and 4.25 ± 0.28 in group III. The mean apical leakage in all groups in different days was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Endorez sealant showed highest apical leakage, whereas Realseal had minimum leakage. There was significant increase in leakage in all groups with the progression of time. Clinical significance: With the advent of different root canal sealants, the success rate of the root canal-treated teeth can be confirmed.


PDF Share
  1. Ahlberg KM, Tay WM. A methacrylate-based cement used as a root canal sealer. Int Endod J 1998 Jan;31(1):15-21.
  2. Matsumoto K, Inoue K, Matsumoto A. The effect of newly developed root canal sealers on rat dental pulp cells in primary culture. J Endod 1989 Feb;15(2):60-67.
  3. McComb D, Smith DC. Comparison of physical properties of polycarboxylate-based and conventional root canal sealers. J Endod 1976 Aug;2(8):228-235.
  4. Arora C, Kumari M, Taneja S. Comparative evaluation of apical leakage after post space preparation in root canals obturated using three resin based root canal sealers: an invitro study. IJOCR 2014 Oct-Dec;2(4):20-25.
  5. Xu Q, Fan B, Fan MW, Cheung GS, Hu HL. A new quantitative method using glucose for analysis of endodontic leakage. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Oral Radiol Endod 2005 Jan;99(1):107-111.
  6. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Pashley DH, Mak YF, Lai CN, Raina R, Williams MC. Ultrastructural evaluation of the apical seal in roots filled with a polycaprolactone- based root canal filling material. J Endod 2005 Jul;31(7):514-519.
  7. Vassiliadis LP, Sklavounos SA, Stavrianos CK. Depth of penetration and appearance of Grossman sealer in the dentinal tubules: an in vivo study. J Endod 1994 Aug;20(8):373-376.
  8. Roy D, Chowdhury F, Shaik MM, Alam MK. Apical sealing ability of Resilon/epiphany system. Dent Res J 2014 Mar; 11(2):222-227.
  9. Muliyar S, Shameem KA, Thankachan RP, Francis PG, Jayapalan CS, Hafiz KA. Microleakage in endodontics. J Int Oral Health 2014 Nov-Dec;6(6):99-104.
  10. Gutmann JL. Adaptation of injected thermoplasticized guttapercha in the absence of the dentinal smear layer. Int Endod J 1993 Mar;26(2):87-92.
  11. Dultra F, Barroso JM, Carrasco LD, Capelli A, Guerisoli DM, Pécora JD. Evaluation of apical microleakage of teeth sealed with four different root canal sealers. J Appl Oral Sci 2006 Oct;14(5):341-345.
  12. Ehsani M, Dehghani A, Abesi F, Khafri S, Dehkordi SG. Evaluation of apical micro-leakage of different endodontic sealers in the presence and absence of moisture. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2014 Summer;8(3):125-129.
  13. Cobankara FK, Adanir N, Belli S, Pashley DH. A quantitative evaluation of apical leakage of four root-canal sealers. Int Endod J 2002 Dec;35(12):979-984.
  14. Mohan M, Verma A, Dixit KK, Chandra A. In vitro leakage analysis of three different root canal sealers using fluorescent microscopy. Endodontology 2012 Jun;25(1):51-55.
  15. Ýnan U, Aydemir H, Taþdemir T. Leakage evaluation of three different root canal obturation techniques using electrochemical evaluation and dye penetration evaluation methods. Aust Endod J 2007;33(1):18-22
  16. Miletic I, Ribaric SP, Karlovic Z, Jukic S, Bosnjak A, Anic I. Apical leakage of five root canal sealers after one year of storage. J Endod 2002 Jun;28(6):431-432.
  17. Oksan T, Aktener BO, Sen BH, Tezel H. The penetration of root canal sealers into dentinal tubules. A scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 1993 Sep;26(5):301-305.
  18. Pashley DH. Smear layer: physiological considerations. Oper Dent 1984; 3:13-29.
  19. Russin TP, Zardiackas LD, Reader A, Menke RA. Apical seals obtained with laterally condensed, chloroform-softened guttapercha and laterally condensed gutta-percha and Grossman's sealer. J Endod 1980 Aug;6(8):678-682.
  20. Saunders WP, Saunders EM. The effect of smear layer upon the coronal leakage of gutta-percha fillings and a glass ionomer sealer. Int Endod J 1992 Sep;25(5):245-249.
  21. Schwartz RS, Fransman R. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics: materials, clinical strategies and procedures for restoration of access cavities: a review. J Endod 2005 Mar;31(3): 151-165.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.