The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Influence of Light-curing Units on Surface Microhardness and Color Change of Composite Resins after Challenge

André LF Briso, Ticiane C Fagundes, Morganna B de A Souza, Bruna de Oliveira-Reis, Paulo H Dos Santos

Keywords : Composite resin, Curing lights, Dental, Photoinitiators

Citation Information : Briso AL, Fagundes TC, Souza MB, de Oliveira-Reis B, Santos PH. Influence of Light-curing Units on Surface Microhardness and Color Change of Composite Resins after Challenge. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (2):204-210.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2498

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-02-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate microhardness and color change (ΔE) of composite resins, light cured with different light emission diodes (LEDs) and submitted to artificial accelerated aging (AAA). Materials and methods: Two composite resins with lucirin- TPO photoinitiator were selected: Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent, A1) and Vit-l-escence (Ultradent, WO).A resin with the only camphorquinone photoinitiator was chosen as a negative control: Filtek Z350XT (3M ESPE, WD). Disc-shaped specimens were prepared (5 mm diameter; 1.5 mm thick) and photopolymerized with an LED with one wavelength (Radii-Cal, SDI) or multiple wavelengths (Valo, Ultradent), for each composite resin (n = 10). Surface microhardness and color evaluations were performed immediately after specimen preparation and after AAA. Microhardness results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests for multiple comparisons. To compare the evaluation of microhardness at different times, the Wilcoxon test was used. Mean values of ΔE, ΔL, Δa, and Δb were evaluated using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey test for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). Results: Regarding microhardness, a statistically significant difference between the two LEDs was observed for Vit-lescence after AAA. When comparing composite resins that were light-cured with the same device, FiltekZ350XT obtained the greatest microhardness. All groups presented a statistically significant decrease in microhardness from the initial time to the AAA. Regarding ΔE, no statistically significant difference between the two LEDs was observed. When comparing composite resins, FiltekZ350XT showed the highest ΔE values. Conclusion: In general, an LED with multiple wavelengths influenced the microhardness of only one resin containing lucirin-TPO after AAA. The ΔE was more influenced by the composite resin than the LED device. Clinical significance: The knowledge of composite resin with deficiencies in the polymerization mechanism could contribute to preventing restorations to become more susceptible to color change and reduction of the mechanical strength.


PDF Share
  1. Porto IC, Soares LE, Martin AA, Cavalli V, Liporoni PC. Influence of the photoinitiator system and light photoactivation units on the degree of conversion of dental composites. Braz Oral Res 2010 Oct-Dec;24(4):475-481.
  2. Oliveira DC, Rocha MG, Gatti A, Correr AB, Ferracane JL, Sinhoret MA. Effect of different photoinitiators and reducing agents on cure efficiency and color stability of resin-based composites using different LED wavelengths. J Dent 2015 Dec;43(12):1565-1572.
  3. Oliveira DC, Rocha MG, Correa IC, Correr AB, Ferracane JL, Sinhoreti MA. The effect of combining photoinitiator systems on the color and curing profile of resin-based composites. Dent Mater 2016 Oct;32(10):1209-1217.
  4. Price RB, Labrie D, Rueggeberg FA, Sullivan B, Kostylev I, Fahey J. Correlation between the beam profile from a curing light and the microhardness of four resins. Dent Mater 2014 Dec;30(12):1345-1357.
  5. Catelan A, Suzuki TYU, Becker F JR, Briso ALF, dos Santos PH. Influence of surface sealing on color stability and roughness of composite submitted to ultravioet-accelerated aging. J Investig Clin Dent 2017 May;8(2).
  6. Ilie N, Hickel R. Can CQ be completely replaced by alternative initiators in dental adhesives? Dent Mater J 2008 Mar;27(2):221-228.
  7. Santini A, Miletic V, Swift MD, Bradley M. Degree of conversion and microhardness of TPO-containing resin-based composites cured by polywave and monowave LED units. J Dent 2012 Jul;40(7):577-584.
  8. Cardoso KA, Zarpellon DC, Madruga CF, Rodrigues JA, Arrais CA. Effects of radiant exposure values using second and third generation light curing units on the degree of conversion of a lucirin-based resin composite. J Appl Oral Sci 2017 Mar-Apr;25(2):140-146.
  9. Ferracane JL. Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict? Dent Mater 2013 Jan;29(1):51-58.
  10. Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Prahl SA, Pfeifer CS, Ferracane JL. Curing efficiency of dental resin composites formulated with camphorquinone or trimethylbenzoyl-diphenyl-phosphine oxide. Dent Mater 2012 Apr;28(4):392-397.
  11. Sim JS, Seol HJ, Park JK, Garcia-Godoy F, Kim HI, Kwon YH. Interaction of LED light with coinitiator-containing composite resins: Effect of dual peaks. J Dent 2012 Oct;40(10):836-842.
  12. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—State of the art. Dent Mater 2011 Jan;27(1):29-38.
  13. Rosa RS, Balbinot CE, Blando E, Mota EG, Oshima HM, Hirakata L, et al. Evaluation of mechanical properties on three nanofilled composites. Stomatologija 2012;14(4):126-130.
  14. Catelan A, Briso AL, Sundfeld RH, dos Santos PH. Effect of artificial aging on the roughness and microhardness of sealed composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010 Oct;22(5):324-330.
  15. Reis AC, Castro DT, Schiavon MA, Silva LJ, Agnelli JAM. Microstructure and mechanical properties of composite resins subjected to accelerated artificial aging. Braz Dent J 2013 Nov-Dec;24(6):599-604.
  16. Borges AB, Caneppele TMF, Luz M, Pucci CR, Torres CRG. Color stability of resin used for caries infiltration after exposure to different staining solutions. Oper Dent 2014 Jul-Aug;39(4):433-440.
  17. Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 1996 Mar-Apr;21(2):73-80.
  18. Michaud PL, Price RB, Labrie D, Rueggeberg FA, Sullivan B. Localised irradiance distribution found in dental light curing units. J Dent 2014 Feb;42(2):129-139.
  19. Farah RI, Elwi H. Spectrophotometric evaluation of color changes of bleach-shade resin-based composites after staining and bleaching. J Contem Dent Pract 2014 Sep 1;15(5): 587-594.
  20. Oliveira DC, Souza-Júnior EJ, Prieto LT, Coppini EK, Maia RR, Paulillo LA. Color stability and polymerization behavior of direct esthetic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014 Jul- Aug;26(4):288-295.
  21. Rey N, Benbachir N, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Evaluation of the staining potential of a caries infiltrant in comparison to other products. Dent Mater J 2014;33(1):86-91.
  22. Manojlovic D, Dramiæanin MD, Lezaja M, Pongprueksa P, Van Meerbeek B, Miletic V. Effect of resin and photoinitiator on color, translucency and color stability of conventional and low-shrinkage model composites. Dent Mater 2016 Feb;32(2):183-191.
  23. Salgado VE, Borba MM, Cavalcante LM, Moraes RR, Schneider LF. Effect of photoinitiator combinations on hardness, depth of cure, and color of model resincomposites. J Esthet- Restor Dent 2015 Mar-Apr;27(1):S41-48.
  24. Albuquerque PP, Bertolo ML, Cavalcante LM, Pfeifer C, Schineider LF. Degree of conversion, depth of cure, and color stability of experimental dental composite formulated with camphorquinone and phenanthrenequinonephotoinitiators. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015 Mar-Apr;27(1):S49-57.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.