The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2019 ) > List of Articles


A Study to Determine the Accuracy of Various Clinical Techniques of Ridge Mapping before Implant Fixture Placement

S Sriram Balaji

Keywords : Bone calliper, Bone width measurement, Dental implants, Ridge mapping

Citation Information : Balaji SS. A Study to Determine the Accuracy of Various Clinical Techniques of Ridge Mapping before Implant Fixture Placement. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (4):499-503.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2546

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-04-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: The most important parameter to assess prior to implant fixture placement is the available bone width. Radiographic techniques have been found to be inadequate in providing this valuable information, unlike clinical techniques. The purpose of the present study was to determine the accuracy of various clinical techniques of ridge mapping before implant fixture placement. Materials and methods: Ten patients with at least two missing teeth adjacent to each other were selected for the study. Direct and indirect techniques of ridge mapping were carried out to assess the available bone width. Results: The data obtained were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's Post Hoc analysis. The results indicate that there is no significant difference between direct and indirect technique of ridge mapping. Conclusion: Either direct or indirect technique of ridge mapping can be used to assess the width of available bone before implant fixture placement. Clinical significance: Clinical techniques of ridge mapping are handy and can be carried out chairside with ease and less cost and no radiation exposure. Indirect techniques of ridge mapping provide adequate and reliable data regarding bone width just like direct technique. In the absence of a bone mapping caliper, this technique can be used as a diagnostic procedure before implant placement. And during the indirect technique, any material can be utilized with equal efficacy for the fabrication of the guides.

PDF Share
  1. Sümnig W. Determining the alveolar ridge width in planning treatment with endosseous implants. Stomatologie der DDR 1990: 40(3): 120-121.
  2. Eufinger H, König S, Eufinger A. The role of alveolar ridge width in dental implantology. Clinical Oral Investigations 1998;1(4):169-177.
  3. Williams MY, Mealey BL, Hallmon WW. The role of computerized tomography in dental implantology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 Fall;7(3):373-380.
  4. Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. The use of tomography for dental implant planning. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1997; 2:,206-213.
  5. Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Chafetz N, et al. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1989 Oct;33(4):555- 597.
  6. Weinberg LA. CT scan data as radiologic base for optimum dental implant orientation. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(4):381-385.
  7. Wilson DJ. Ridge mapping for determination of alveolar ridge width. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Spring;4(1):41-43.
  8. Ten Bruggenkate CM, de Rijcke TB, Kraaijenhagen HA, Oosterbeek HS. Ridge mapping. Implant Dent 1994 Fall;3(3):179-182.
  9. Windhom RJ. Fabrication and use of a simple implant placement guide. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2002;92(2):196-199.
  10. Stuempell LJ. Cast based guided implant placement. A novel technique. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2008;100(1):61-69.
  11. Zosky JG In-office linear tomography: a new technology for definitive preplanning of endosteal implant sites. Int J Dent Symp 1995;3(1):26-29.
  12. Traxler M, Ulm C, Solar P, et al. Sonographic measurement versus mapping for determination of alveolar ridge width. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67(3): 358-361.
  13. Lam E, Ruprechet A, Yang L. Comparision of 2 dimensionally orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panaromic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74 (3):42-46.
  14. Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.1991;2:40-42.
  15. Chen LC, Lundgren T, Hallström H, et al. Comparison of Different Methods of Assessing Alveolar Ridge Dimensions Prior to Dental Implant Placement. Journal of Periodontology 2008;79(3):401-405.
  16. Castro-Ruiz CT, Noriega J, Guerrero ME. Validity of ridge mapping and computed tomography in dental implant therapy. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 2015;19(3):290-293.
  17. Castro-Ruiz CT, Noriega J, Guerrero ME. Technique to assess the alveolar bone width for immediate implant placement in fresh extraction socket. Indian journal of dental research. 2013;24(6):784-786.
  18. Chugh A, Bhisnoi P, Kalra D, et al. Comparative evaluation of three different methods for evaluating alveolar ridge dimension prior to implant placement: An in vivo study. Journal of dental implants. 2013;3(2)
  19. Luk LC, Pow EH, Li TK, et al. Comparision of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography forplanning dental implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(1):70-74.
  20. Behnia H, Haidi A. An assessment of the accuracy of ridge mapping versus ct scan in determination of alveolar ridge width. J Dent Sch 2006;24(3):291-297.
  21. Dave BH, Sutaria S, Mehta S, et al. A comparative study of three different methods for evaluating width of alveolar ridge prior to implant placement: An in vivo study. Int J Oral Care Res 2017;5(1): 53-60.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.