The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 8 ( August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Influence of Resin Solvent on Color and Surface Roughness of Aesthetic Restorative Materials

Inas A Elghandour

Keywords : Color change, Detection of resin composites, Laboratory research, Resin composite, Resin remover, Resin solvent, Surface roughness

Citation Information : Elghandour IA. Influence of Resin Solvent on Color and Surface Roughness of Aesthetic Restorative Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (8):901-906.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2628

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to ascertain the influence of a resin remover on color and surface roughness of two resin composites. Materials and methods: Disc-shaped specimens were fabricated from either a Te-Econom plus microhybrid or a Tetric EvoCeram nanocomposite. The color and surface roughness of the specimens were measured before and after treatment, with a resin remover for 3, 5, and 8 minutes. The color was measured using a reflective spectrophotometer according to the CIE L*a*b* color space measurements. Surface roughness was evaluated using optical profilometry. Results were statistically analyzed using Student\'s t test, ANOVA, Tukey\'s post hoc, and Pearson\'s correlation tests. Results: The resin remover induced a statistically significant color change of both resin composites, which increased with increasing the time of immersion to 8 minutes. The color change of Tetric EvoCeram was higher than that of the Te-Econom Plus. Surface roughness change was more pronounced with Tetric EvoCeram. No correlation was found between changes in color and surface roughness. Conclusion: Resin solvent changed the color of microhybrid and nanocomposite. Increasing the immersion time to 8 minutes increased the color change. The type of composite influenced the changes in color and surface roughness. Clinical significance: Resin solvent had potentials to stain resin composites, which could be helpful in its identification from tooth structure during removal of failed resin composite restorations.


PDF Share
  1. Morikawa A, Ohmoto K, et al. Long term Clinical Observations on Two Posterior Restorative Composite Resins. Hiroshima Univ Dent J 1990;22:332–341.
  2. Uo M, Okamoto M, et al. Rare earth oxide-containing fluorescent glass filler for composite resin. Dent Mater J 2005;24:49–52. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.24.49.
  3. Tani K, Watari F, et al. Discrimination between composite resin and teeth using fluorescence properties. Dent Mater J 2003;22:569–580. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.22.569.
  4. Bush MA, Hermanson AS, et al. The use of ultraviolet LED illumina- tion for composite resin removal: an in vitro study. Gen Dent 2010; 58:e214–e218.
  5. Benthaus S, Du Chesne A, et al. A new technique for the post- mortem detection of tooth-coloured dental restorations. Int J Legal Med 1998;111:157–159. DOI: 10.1007/s004140050138.
  6. Carson DO, Orihara Y, et al. Detection of white restorative dental materials using an alternative light source. Forensic Sci Int 1997;88: 163–168. DOI: 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00115-1.
  7. Meller C, Klein C. Fluorescence properties of commercial composite resin restorative materials in dentistry. Dent Mater J 2012;31:916–923. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2012-079.
  8. Meller C, Klein C. Fluorescence of composite resins: a comparison among properties of commercial shades. Dent Mater J 2015;34: 754–765. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-219.
  9. Hermanson AS, Bush MA, et al. Ultraviolet illumination as an adjunctive aid in dental inspection. J Forensic Sci 2008;53:408–411. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00657.x.
  10. Abdallah MN, Light N, et al. Development of a composite resin disclosing agent based on the understanding of tooth staining mechanisms. J Dent 2014;42:697–708. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.004.
  11. Gaintantzopoulou M, Kakaboura A, et al. Colour stability of tooth-coloured restorative materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005;13:51–56.
  12. Johnston WM. Color measurement in dentistry. J Dent 2009; 37(Suppl. 1):e2–e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.011.
  13. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TR 28642 Dentistry—guidance on color measurement. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2011.
  14. Ghinea R, Perez MM, et al. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent 2010;38(Suppl. 2):e57–e64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.008.
  15. Abouelatta O. 3D Surface Roughness Measurement Using a Light Sectioning Vision System. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2010. vol. I.
  16. Giacomelli L, Derchi G, et al. Surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: An analysis with atomic force microscopy. Open Dent J 2010;4:191–194. DOI: 10.2174/1874210601004010191.
  17. Horcas I, Fernandez R, et al. WSXM: a software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev Sci Instrum 2007;78:013705. DOI: 10.1063/1.2432410.
  18. Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, et al. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18: 155–163. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8.
  19. Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ Science of Dental materials. Applied Oral Science, 11th ed. St Louis: Elsevier, 2003 2009. pp. 108–112, vol. 17.
  20. Khokhar ZA, Razzoog ME, et al. Color stability of restorative resins. Quintessence Int 1991;22:733–737.
  21. Cengiz S, Yüzbaşioğlu E, et al. Color stability and surface roughness of a laboratory-processed composite resin as a function of mouthrinse. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27:314–321. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12167.
  22. Kuehni RG, Marcus RT. An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences. Color Res Appl 1979;4:83–91.
  23. Lee YK, Lim BS, et al. Effect of surface conditions on the color of dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:657–663. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10383.
  24. Reis AF, Giannini M, et al. Effects of various finishing system on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2003;19:12–18. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00014-3.
  25. Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, et al. Surface properties of resin-based composite materials and biofilm formation: a review of the current literature. Am J Dent 2015;28:311–320.
  26. Oysaed H, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and filler characteristics of composites for use in posterior teeth. J Dent Res 1986;65:1315–1318. DOI: 10.1177/00220345860650110601.
  27. da Silva MA, Fardin AB, et al. Analysis of roughness and surface hardness of a dental composite using atomic force microscopy and microhardness testing. Microsc Microanal 2011;17:446–451. DOI: 10.1017/S1431927611000250.
  28. Telang A, Narayana IH, et al. Effect of staining and bleaching on color stability and surface roughness of three resin composites: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2018;9:452–456.
  29. Elwardani G, Sharaf AA, et al. Evaluation of colour change and surface roughness of two resin-based composites when exposed to beverages commonly used by children: an in-vitro study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2018 Dec 26. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-018-0393-1.
  30. Ren YF, Feng L, et al. Effects of common beverage colorants on color stability of dental composite resins: the utility of a thermocycling stain challenge model in vitro. J Dent 2012;40(Suppl. 1):e48–e56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.017.
  31. Mitra SB, Wu D, et al. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1382–1390. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0054.
  32. Sideridou I, Tserki V, et al. Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2002;23:1819–1829. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01) 00308-8.
  33. Tavangar M, Bagheri R, et al. Influence of beverages and surface roughness on the color change of resin composites. J Invest Clin Dent 2018;9:1–8. DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12333.
  34. Gönülol N, Yılmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2012;40:e64–e70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.005.
  35. Al-Shalan TA. In vitro staining of nanocomposites exposed to cola beverage. Pak Oral Dent J 2009;29:79–84.
  36. Iazzetti G, Burgess JO, et al. Color stability of fluoride containing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2000;25:520–525.
  37. Villalta P, Lu H, et al. Effects of staining and bleaching on color change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:137–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.019.
  38. Ardu S, Duc O, et al. Color stability of recent composite resins. Odontology 2017;105:29–35. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-016-0234-9.
  39. Lemos CAA, Mauro SJ, et al. Influence of Mechanical and Chemical Degradation in the Surface Roughness, Gloss, and Color of Microhybrid Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18:283–288. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2032.
  40. Yu H, Cheng SL, et al. Effects of cyclic staining on the color, translucency, surface roughness, and substance loss of contemporary adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:462–469. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.009.
  41. Antonson SA, Yazici AR, et al. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2011;39:9–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.006.
  42. Da Costa J, Ferracane J, et al. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:214–224. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007. 00104.x.
  43. Dede DÖ, Şahin O, et al. Effect of sealant agents on the color stability and surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:119–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.024.
  44. Yikilgan İ, Akgul S, et al. The effects of fresh detox juices on color stability and roughness of resin-based composites. J Prosthodont 2019;28(1):e82–e88. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12759.
  45. Hwang S, Chung SH, et al. Influence of acid, ethanol, and anthocyanin pigment on the optical and mechanical properties of a nanohybrid dental composite resin. Materials (Basel) 2018;18:11–17.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.