The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effects of the Contents of Various Solvents in One-step Self-etch Adhesives on Shear Bond Strengths to Enamel and Dentin

FA Ageel, MQ Alqahtani

Keywords : Dentin, Enamel, Laboratory research, Self-etch adhesives, Shear bond strength, Solvents

Citation Information : Ageel F, Alqahtani M. Effects of the Contents of Various Solvents in One-step Self-etch Adhesives on Shear Bond Strengths to Enamel and Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (11):1260-1268.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2683

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-11-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strengths (SBSs) of one-step self-etch adhesives containing different co-solvents to enamel and dentin and to determine the failure modes of tested specimens. Materials and methods: Two hundred and forty (n = 240) sound human molars were used. The buccal surfaces of each tooth were ground and polished to obtain flat enamel surfaces (n = 120) or to expose the underlying dentin (n = 120). The specimens with exposed enamel or dentin were randomly divided into four main groups (n = 30) according to the one-step self-etch adhesives used: Bond-1 SF, OptiBond All-In-One, G-aenial, and Single Bond Universal adhesive. All the main groups were then subdivided into two subgroups (control and thermocycling subgroups) (n = 15). After bonding procedures, a composite restoration (Filtek Z250) was applied in a vinyl tube and condensed against the cured adhesive bonding agent, to form a resin cylinder. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours (control and thermocycling subgroups), followed by thermocycling (5–55°C/5,000 cycles + storage in artificial saliva for 2 weeks) (thermocycling subgroup). They were subjected to SBS testing in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. After being shear-tested, all fractured samples were examined by means of a Hirox Digital Microscope at 50× magnification for failure analysis. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey\'s post hoc analysis at a p value of ≤0.05. Results: OptiBond All-In-One adhesive showed significantly higher mean SBS values on both types of tooth structures (enamel and dentin) and under different conditions (control and thermocycled) compared with the other three adhesives (p < 0.001), except in the enamel-thermocycled group, where the Single Bond Universal adhesive showed higher mean SBS but without a significant difference compared with the OptiBond All-In-One adhesive (p = 0.266), and there was no significant difference between OptiBond All-In-One and G-aenial Bond in the same group (p = 0.192). Conversely, Bond-1 SF showed significantly lower mean SBS values compared with those of the other three adhesives on different types of tooth structures and under different conditions (control and thermocycled) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: One-step self-etch adhesives containing ethanol as a solvent or co-solvent showed higher SBS compared with the other self-etching bonding agents. The bond strength values of these adhesives to dentin are significantly higher than those to enamel. Clinical relevance: The types of solvents of one-step self-etch adhesives had an effect on SBS, and the absence of solvent in those adhesives would adversely influence their performance.


PDF Share
  1. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, et al. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998 Jan;26(1):1–20. DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00070-X.
  2. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955 Dec;34(6): 849–853. DOI: 10.1177/00220345550340060801.
  3. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982 May;16(3):265–273. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820160307.
  4. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011 Jan;27(1):1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016.
  5. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, et al. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int 1993 Sep;24(9):618–631.
  6. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, et al. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995 May;74(5):1168–1178. DOI: 10.1177/00220345950740050501.
  7. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000 Jul–Aug;25(4):324–330.
  8. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011 Jan;27(1):17–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023.
  9. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010 Feb;26(2):e100–e121. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148.
  10. Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, et al. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009 Jun;11(3):175–190.
  11. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res 1999 Apr;78(4):906–911. DOI: 10.1177/00220345990780041101.
  12. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH. The overwet phenomenon: an optical, micromorphological study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996 Feb;9(1):43–48.
  13. Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres AP, et al. Self-etch adhesive systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J 2015 Jan–Feb;26(1):3–10. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201302442.
  14. Kanca 3rd J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. 1. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992 Jan;23(1):39–41.
  15. Poggio C, Beltrami R, Scribante A, et al. Shear bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives: pH influence. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015 May–Jun;12(3):209–214.
  16. ra dos Led S, mm de A P, Abl do N, et al. Bond strength to dentin of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems. RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia 2014 Mar;62(4):365–370. DOI: 10.1590/1981-8637201400040000022648.
  17. Sharafeddin F, Choobineh MM. Assessment of the Shear Bond Strength between Nanofilled Composite Bonded to Glass-ionomer Cement Using Self-etch Adhesive with Different pHs and Total-Etch Adhesive. J Dent (Shiraz) 2016 Mar;17(1):1–6.
  18. Malik S, Bal CS, Singh R. Tensile bond strength of total etch and self-etch adhesives on moist and dry dentin in vivo study. Indian J Comprehensive Dent Care 2014 Jul–Dec;4(2):422–427.
  19. Subhra Dey AS, Kundapur SS, Das M, et al. Evaluation of the Effect of Different Contaminants on the Shear Bond Strength of a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive System, One-step, Self-etch Adhesive System and a Total-etch Adhesive System. J Int Oral Health 2016 Jan;8(3): 378–384.
  20. Chaudhary SBR, Tayal A. Influence of different types of co-solvents on the bonding abilities of one step self-etching adhesives: An Ex vivo Study. Indian J Dent Sci 2016 Jan;8(4):221–225. DOI: 10.4103/0976-4003.196818.
  21. Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Kouros P, Koumpia E, et al. Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive vs contemporary adhesive systems. Braz J Oral Sci 2014 Mar;13(1):64–69. DOI: 10.1590/1677-3225v13n1a13.
  22. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999 Feb;27(2):89–99. DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2.
  23. Gurgan S, Alpaslan T, Kiremitci A, et al. Effect of different adhesive systems and laser treatment on the shear bond strength of bleached enamel. J Dent 2009 Jul;37(7):527–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.012.
  24. Gregoire G, Dabsie F, Dieng-Sarr F, et al. Solvent composition of one-step self-etch adhesives and dentine wettability. J Dent 2011 Jan;39(1):30–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.09.008.
  25. Klein-Junior CA, Zander-Grande C, Amaral R, et al. Evaporating solvents with a warm air-stream: effects on adhesive layer properties and resin-dentin bond strengths. J Dent 2008 Aug;36(8):618–625. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.014.
  26. Shirban F, Khoroushi M, Shirban M. A new solvent-free one-step self-etch adhesive: bond strength to tooth structures. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013 Mar 1;14(2):269–274. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1312.
  27. El Sayed HY, Abdalla AI, Shalby ME, et al. Effect of thermocycling on the micro-shear bond strength of solvent free and solvent containing self-etch adhesives to dentin. Tanta Dent J 2015 Mar;12(1):28–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.tdj.2014.09.001.
  28. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007 Sep;28(26):3757–3785. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044.
  29. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, et al. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005 Feb;84(2):183–188. DOI: 10.1177/154405910508400214.
  30. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, et al. The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2008 Oct;24(10):1412–1419. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.018.
  31. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004 Jun;83(6):454–458. DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300604.
  32. Jayasheel A, Niranjan N, Pamidi H, et al. Comparative Evaluation of shear Bond Strength. J Clin Exp Dent 2017 Jul;9(7):892–896.
  33. Guo X, Spencer P, Wang Y, et al. Effects of a solubility enhancer on penetration of hydrophobic component in model adhesives into wet demineralized dentin. Dent Mater 2007 Dec;23(12):1473–1481. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.12.003.
  34. Howannaphakorn T, Duangmanee Y, Siwapatt N, et al. Effects of Acetone Evaporation Duration of Dentin Bonding Agent on Microleakage. Naresuan University Journal Science and Technolog 2013 Aug;2:23–26.
  35. Abate PF, Rodriguez VI, Macchi RL. Evaporation of solvent in one-bottle adhesives. J Dent 2000 Aug;28(6):437–440. DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00018-X.
  36. Wang Y, Spencer P, Yao X, et al. Effect of solvent content on resin hybridization in wet dentin bonding. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007 Sep 15;82(4):975–983. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31232.
  37. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, et al. Self-assembled Nano-layering at the Adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012 Apr;91(4):376–381. DOI: 10.1177/0022034512437375.
  38. Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, et al. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013 May;41(5):404–411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001.
  39. Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Koliniotou-Kubia E, Dionyssopoulos P. The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil 2004 Sep;31(9):911–917. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01318.x.
  40. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Mine A, et al. Filler debonding & subhybrid-layer failures in self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2010 Oct;89(10):1045–1050. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510375285.
  41. Leloup G, D'Hoore W, Bouter D, et al. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 2001 Jul;80(7):1605–1614. DOI: 10.1177/00220345010800070301.
  42. Torneck CD, Titley KC, Smith DC, et al. The influence of time of hydrogen peroxide exposure on the adhesion of composite resin to bleached bovine enamel. J Endod 1990 Mar;16(3):123–128. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81588-8.
  43. Tekce N, Demirci M, Tuncer S, et al. Microtensile bond strength and sealing efficiency of all-in-one self-etching adhesives. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 2015 Feb;29(3):570–578. DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2015.1008875.
  44. Sezinando A. Looking for the ideal adhesive – A review. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial 2014 Oct–Dec;55(4):194–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.07.004.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.