The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2019 ) > List of Articles


In Vitro Analysis of Different Polishing Systems on the Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Nanocomposite Resins

Kiran Murthy Dhananjaya, Suneel V Vadavadagi, Sultan A Almalki, Tanya Verma

Keywords : Color stability, Nanocomposite, Polishing, Surface roughness

Citation Information : Dhananjaya KM, Vadavadagi SV, Almalki SA, Verma T. In Vitro Analysis of Different Polishing Systems on the Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Nanocomposite Resins. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (11):1335-1338.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2691

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-11-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: To assess the different polishing systems on the color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposite resins. Materials and methods: A total of 60 composite resin samples were fabricated. The Tetric N Ceram composite was compacted into the custom-made cylindrical metallic mold of internal diameter 6 × 6 mm. Based on the polishing system used, sixty samples were divided into three groups. Group I: Sof-Lex, group II: Shofu super-snap polishing disks, and group III: Astropol. The samples in each group were immersed in beverage, that is tea. Spectrophotometer was used to measure the color of the samples after staining period. And surface profilometer was used to measure all surface roughness. Results: Of the three groups, Sof-Lex polishing group reported the least mean value of 0.458 ± 0.118 succeeded by Astropol polishing group (0.494 ± 0.121) and Shofu super-snap polishing group (0.540 ± 0.031) having the higher mean value. Statistically significant difference was found between the different polishing systems calculated by analysis of variance. And color change between the groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion: We conclude that a composite polished with Sof-Lex was a superior polish compared to Astropol polishing group and Shofu super-snap polishing group. There was only a minimal difference in the color stability of the composite between the groups. Clinical significance: Excellent finishing and polishing are the critical steps to enhance the esthetics and longevity of the composite restorations. High strength, fracture toughness, surface hardness, optimum polishability, and gloss are the functional properties which need assessment while a resin composite is used for restoration.

  1. Hotwani K, Thosar N, Baliga S. Comparative in vitro assessment of color stability of hybrid esthetic restorative materials against various children's beverages. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(1):70–74. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.124154.
  2. Veena Kumari R. Evaluation of surface roughness of composite resins with three different polishing systems and the erosive potential with apple cider vinegar using atomic force microscopy-an in vitro study. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 2019;3(3):08–16.
  3. Gonçalves MA, Teixeira VC, Rodrigues SS, et al. Evaluation of the roughness of composite resins submitted to different surface treatments. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2012;25(1):89–95.
  4. Madhyastha PS, Naik DG, Srikant N, et al. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of silorane and methacrylate based restorative materials. Oral Health Dent Manag 2015;14:212–218.
  5. de Oliveira Lima M, Catelan A, Hernandes NM, et al. In vitro evaluation of the effect of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of composite resins submitted to at-home and in-office bleaching procedures. J Conserv Dent 2015;18(6):483–487. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.168820.
  6. Chour RG, Moda A, Arora A, et al. Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: an in vitro study. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2016;6(Suppl 2):166–170. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.189761.
  7. Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, et al. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2011;39(1):e9–e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.006.
  8. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, et al. Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials. J Dent Sci 2013;8(2):160–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.007.
  9. Baig AR, Shori DD, Shenoi PR, et al. Mouthrinses affect color stability of composite. J Conserv Dent 2016;19(4):355–359. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.186448.
  10. Patel B, Chhabra N, Jain D. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nanohybrid composites. J Conserv Dent 2016;19(1):37–40. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.173192.
  11. Kumari RV, Nagaraj H, Siddaraju K, et al. Evaluation of the effect of surface polishing, oral beverages and food colorants on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposite resins. J Int Oral Health 2015;7(7):63–70.
  12. Abzal MS, Rathakrishnan M, Prakash V, et al. Evaluation of surface roughness of three different composite resins with three different polishing systems. J Conserv Dent 2016;19(2):171–174. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.178703.
  13. Yap AU, Ng JJ, Yap SH, et al. Surface finish of resin-modified and highly viscous glass ionomer cements produced by new one-step systems. Operative Dentistry-University of Washington 2004;29(1): 87–91.
  14. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134(10):1382–1390. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0054.
  15. Nordbö H, Attramadal A, Eriksen HM. Iron discoloration of acrylic resin exposed to chlorhexidine or tannic acid: a model study. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49(1):126–129. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90252-4.
  16. Gharechahi M. Effect of surface roughness and materials composition on biofilm formation. J Bio Nanotech 2012;3(4):541–546.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.