The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Push-out Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Cemented Using New Universal Adhesives on Etched and Nonetched Intraradicular Dentin

Valentina Spicciarelli, Hani F Ounsi, Marco Ferrari, Giacomo Corsentino, Crystal Marruganti, Simone Grandini

Keywords : Bond strength, Dark-curing, Fiber post, Laboratory research, Universal adhesives

Citation Information : Spicciarelli V, Ounsi HF, Ferrari M, Corsentino G, Marruganti C, Grandini S. Push-out Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Cemented Using New Universal Adhesives on Etched and Nonetched Intraradicular Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (1):91-96.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2750

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess if the curing mode and the etching mode could affect the push-out bond strength of different post cementation systems using two universal adhesives. Materials and methods: A total of 100 single-rooted teeth were divided into Prime & Bond Elect (PBE), Prime & Bond Active (PBA), and Prime & Bond XP (PBXP) as a control. The PBE, PBA, and PBXP were used in the self-etch (SE) and etch and rinse (E&R) mode. Post cementation was performed using Core X flow used in dark-cure and in light-cure. Data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test and post hoc Bonferroni and Dunnet tests. The Student's t test was performed to find significance between two independent groups. Results: Bond strength was significantly influenced by the adhesive strategies. The PBE and PBA obtained higher values when used in the SE mode (p < 0.001). Light-cured groups obtained significantly higher values (p < 0.001) compared to dark-cured groups. The post space region also had a significant effect on the bond strength; the apical third recorded lower values in all groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The PBA and PBE universal adhesives obtained higher PBS values when used in the SE mode and followed by the light-curing of resin cement. Clinical significance: Universal adhesives represent a good alternative to the conventional total-etch adhesive system for fiber post cementation. Since they perform better in SE, they would be recommendable in clinical practice, as they can be used with a simplified technique.

HTML PDF Share
  1. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, et al. Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2007;20(5):287–291.
  2. Rasimick BJ, Wan J, Musikant BL, et al. A review of failure modes in teeth restored with adhesively luted endodontic dowels. J Prosthodont 2010;19(8):639–646. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00647.x.
  3. Maroulakos G, He J, Nagy WW. The Post-endodontic adhesive interface: Theoretical perspectives and potential flaws. J Endod 2018;44(3):363–371. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.007.Epub.
  4. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;42(7): 800–807. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012.
  5. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40(6): 475–484. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012.
  6. Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, et al. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2015 Oct;43(10):1229–1234. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009.
  7. Diniz AC, Bandeca MC, Pinheiro LM, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength to enamel using universal adhesive systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(10):820–825. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1937.
  8. Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, et al. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2016;41(5):520–530. DOI: 10.2341/15-347-L.
  9. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Hosoya Y, et al. Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in self-etch mode. Am J Dent 2017;30(5):279–284.
  10. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine. Old wine in new bottles? J Dent 2015;43(5):525–536. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004.
  11. Grégoire G, Sharrock P, Prigent Y. Performance of a universal adhesive on etched and non-etched surfaces: Do the results match the expectations? Mater Sci Eng C Mater Bio Appl 2016;66:199–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.022.
  12. Jayasheel A, Niranjan N, Pamidi H, et al. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of universal dental adhesives - An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(7):e892–e896. DOI: 10.4317/jced.53816.
  13. Forgerini TV, Ribeiro JF, Rocha RO, et al. Role of etching mode on bonding longevity of a universal adhesive to eroded dentin. J Adhes Dent 2017;19(1):69–75. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a37723.
  14. De Santis R, Prisco D, Apicella A, et al. Carbon fiber post adhesion to resin luting cement in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000;11(4):201–206. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008987823354.
  15. Vano M, Cury AH, Goracci C, et al. Retention of fiber posts cemented at different time intervals in canals obturated using an epoxy resin sealer. J Dent 2008;36(10):801–807. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.016.
  16. Gurgel-Filho ED, Lima FC, Saboia Vde P, et al. Push-out bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement used as endodontic sealer. Restor Dent Endod 2014 Nov;39(4):282–287. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2014.39.4.282.
  17. Kadam A, Pujar M, Patil C. Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro. J Conserv Dent 2013;16(5):444–448. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.117522.
  18. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, et al. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30(5):627–635.
  19. Bouillaguet S, Schütt A, Alander P, et al. Hydrothermal and mechanical stresses degrade fiber-matrix interfacial bond strength in dental fiber-reinforced composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;76(1):98–105. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30349.
  20. Coniglio I, Magni E, Cantoro A, et al. Push-out bond strength of circular and oval-shaped fiber posts. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15(5):667–672. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0448-0.
  21. Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E, et al. Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: A scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97(3):381–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003. 10.004.
  22. Muniz L, Mathias P. The influence of sodium hypochlorite and root canal sealers on post retention in different dentin regions. Oper Dent 2005;30(4):533–539.
  23. Camargo CH, Siviero M, Camargo SE, et al. Topographical, diametral, and quantitative analysis of dentin tubules in the root canals of human and bovine teeth. J Endod 2007;33(4):422–426. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.011.
  24. Caiado AC, de Goes MF, de Souza-Filho FJ, et al. The effect of acid etchant type and dentin location on tubular density and dimension. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103(6):352–361. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60076-5.
  25. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, et al. Bond strength versus dentine structure: a modelling approach. Arch Oral Biol 1995;40(12):1109–1118. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(95)00090-9.
  26. Manicardi CA, Versiani MA, Saquy PC, et al. Influence of filling materials on the bonding interface of thin-walled roots reinforced with resin and quartz fiber posts. J Endod 2011;37(4):531–537. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.009.
  27. Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, et al. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2014;30(10):1126–1135. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.002.
  28. Montanari M, Prati C, Piana G. Differential hydrolytic degradation of dentin bonds when luting carbon fiber posts to the root canal. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16(3):e411–e417. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.16.e411.
  29. Calixto LR, Bandeca MC, Clavijo V, et al. Effect of resin cement system and root region on the push-out bond strength of a translucent fiber post. Oper Dent 2012;37(1):80–86. DOI: 10.2341/11-035-L.
  30. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of Universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43(7):765–776. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003.
  31. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27(1):1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016.
  32. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent 2014;42(5):603–612. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008.
  33. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, et al. Limited decalcification/diffusion of self adhesive cements into dentin. J Dent Res 2008;87(10):974–979. DOI: 10.1177/154405910808701012.
  34. Soares CJ, Pereira JC, Valdivia ADCM, et al. Influence of resin cement and post configuration on bond strength to root dentine. Int Endod J 2012;45(2):136–145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01953.x.
  35. Gomes GM, Gomes OM, Reis A, et al. Effect of operator experience on the outcome of fiber post cementation with different resin cements. Oper Dent 2013;38(5):555–564. DOI: 10.2341/11-494-L.
  36. Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, et al. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117(3):326–333. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00623.x.
  37. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Baldini M, et al. Push-out strength of translucent fiber posts cemented using a dual-curing technique or a light-curing self-adhering material. Int Endod J 2011;45(3):249–256. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01969.x.
  38. Goracci C, Corciolani G, Vichi A, et al. Light-transmitting ability of marketed fiber posts. J Dent Res 2008;87(12):1122–1126. DOI: 10.1177/154405910808701208.
  39. Radovic I, Corciolani G, Magni E, et al. Light transmission through fiber post: the effect on adhesion, elastic modulus and hardness of dual-cure resin cement. Dent Mater 2009;25(7):837–844. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.004.
  40. Fonseca RG, Cruz CA, Adabo GL. The influence of chemical activation on hardness of dual-curing resin cements. Braz Oral Res 2004;18(3):228–232. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242004000300009.
  41. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001;17(5):422–429. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00102-0.
  42. Grandini S, Sapio S, Goracci C, et al. A one step procedure for luting glass fibre posts: an SEM evaluation. Int Endod J 2004;37(10):679–686. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00850.x.
  43. Boing TF, Gomes GM, Gomes JC, et al. Is the bonding of self-adhesive cement sensitive to root region and curing mode? J App Oral Sci 2017;25(1):2–9. DOI: 10.1590/1678-77572015-0430.
  44. Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, et al. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent 2014;39(1):E31–E44. DOI: 10.2341/13-070-LIT.
  45. Daleprane B, Pereira CNB, Oréfice RL, et al. The effect of light-curing access and different resin cements on apical bond strength of fiber posts. Oper Dent 2014;39(2):E93–E100. DOI: 10.2341/12-477-L.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.