The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

A Comparative Radiographic Evaluation of Occlusal Plane in Dentulous and Edentulous Subjects: A Clinical Study

Bishnupati Singh, Subhash Chandra, Kumar Sourabh, Ajoy K Shahi, Swati Sharma

Keywords : Dentulous, Edentulous, Inferior border of mandible, Occlusal plane

Citation Information : Singh B, Chandra S, Sourabh K, Shahi AK, Sharma S. A Comparative Radiographic Evaluation of Occlusal Plane in Dentulous and Edentulous Subjects: A Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (1):97-104.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2737

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-01-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to establish a proportion between the inferior border of mandible and lower edge of the mental foramen and inferior border of mandible to occlusal plane for dentulous subjects and to evaluate the validity of this proportion in orienting the occlusal plane for edentulous subjects. Materials and methods: The occlusal plane was evaluated in the selected 50 dentulous and edentulous subjects for its relation to the mental foramen and inferior border of the mandible. The orthopantograms obtained were traced with the markings and the measurements were tabulated under different headings. After measuring the distances, the proportion between the distances was determined. The mean proportions of dentulous, edentulous, male, and female subjects were evaluated. Then the proportion of male subjects was compared with that of female subjects and dentulous subjects with that of edentulous subjects. Comparison of proportion between the different groups was done by using unpaired t test. The mean and standard deviation (SD) were determined for each group separately and were compared within each group. From the calculated “t” value, “p” the probability for error was found out. Results: In dentulous subjects, the proportion ranged from 1:3.53 to 1:4.40. The mean was 1:3.90. In edentulous subjects, the proportion ranged from 1:3.50 to 1:4.15. The mean was 1:3.84. On comparison, the difference between both the groups was 0.06. The difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.14). In the comparison of dentulous male and female subjects, the difference obtained was 0.02. The difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.77). The comparison of edentulous male and female subjects and the difference obtained was 0.03. The difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.51). Conclusion: The derived proportion of 1:4 between the inferior border of mandible and mental foramen and inferior border of mandible and occlusal plane in edentulous patients as measured on an orthopantogram may yield a plane of occlusion similar to that existing in the dentulous state. Clinical significance: The above-drawn proportion between the inferior border of the mandible to the lower edge of the mental foramen and between the inferior border of the mandible and the occlusal plane in edentulous patients may yield a plane of occlusion which is oriented similar to that existing in the dentulous state. The proportions derived radiographically in this study can serve as a basis for future studies to establish the occlusal plane for edentulous subjects.


PDF Share
  1. Okane H, Yamashina T, Nagasawa T, et al. The effect of anteroposterior inclination of the occlusal plane on biting force. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42(5):497–501. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90241-5.
  2. Kapur KK, Soman S. The effect of denture factors on masticatory performance. Part III. The location of the food platforms. J Prosthet Dent 1965;15:451–463. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(65)80013-0.
  3. Ismail YH, Bowman JF. Position of the occlusal plane in natural and artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1968;20(5):407–411. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(68)80017-4.
  4. Spratley MH. A simplified technique for determining the occlusal plane in full denture construction. J Oral Rehab 1980;7(1):31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1980.tb01460.x.
  5. Williams DR. Occlusal plane orientation in complete denture construction. J Dent 1982;10(4):311–316. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(82)90024-0.
  6. Wical KE, Swoope CC. Studies of residual ridge resorption part 1. Use of panoramic radiographs for evaluation and classification of mandibular resorption. J Prosthet Dent 1974;32(1):7–12. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(74)90093-6.
  7. Singh G. Ala tragus line: a cephalometric evaluation. Int J Prosthodont 2010;1:1–5.
  8. Abrahams R, Carey PD. The use of the ala-tragus line for occlusal plane determination in complete dentures. J Dent 1979;7(4):339–341. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(79)90147-7.
  9. Phillips JL, Weller RN, Kulild JC. The mental foramen: part 1 size orientation and positional relationship to the mandibular second premolar. J Endod 1990;16(5):221–223. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81674-2.
  10. Xie Q, Soikkonen K, Wolf J, et al. Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25(2):61–66. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.25.2.9446974.
  11. Yosue T, Brooks SL. The appearance of mental foramina on panoramic radiographs. I. Evaluation of patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68(3):360–364. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(89)90224-7.
  12. Guler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, et al. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(10):741–746. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01499.x.
  13. Monteith BD. A cephalometric method to determine the angulation of the occlusal plane in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54(1):81–87. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(85)80076-7.
  14. Beresin VE, Schiesser FJ. Neutral zone in complete and partial dentures, 2nd ed., The CV Mosby Company; 1978.
  15. L'Estrange PR, Vig PS. A comparative study of the occlusal plane in dentulous and edentulous subjects. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33(5): 495–503. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(75)80161-2.
  16. Dento-Profile Scale Company, Instruction Manual. 1938. Fond du Lac, Wis.
  17. Willis FM. Features of the face involved in full denture prosthesis. Dent Cosmos 1935;77:851–854.
  18. Harper RN. The denture gauge. Dent Items Int 1952;74:891–911.
  19. L'Estrange PR, Murray CG. Application of lateral skull cephalometry to prosthodontics. Aust Orthod J 1976;4(4):146–152.
  20. Stansbery CJ. Complete full denture technique. Dent Dig 1933;39: 156–159.
  21. Winkler S. Essentials of complete denture prosthodontics, 2nd ed., Massachusetts: PSG Publishing Co., Inc.; 1998.
  22. Warburton WL. Pre extraction records necessary for the creation of esthetic full dentures. Dent Surv 1946;22(11):2069–2073.
  23. Turrell AJW. The pre-extraction recording of the vertical dimension by an intra oral method. Dent Pract 1955;6:68–72.
  24. Silverman MM. Occlusion in prosthodontics and in the natural dentition. Washington D.C.: Mutual Publishing Company; 1962. pp. 25–36, 60–70.
  25. Augsburger RH. Occlusal plane relation to facial type. J Prosthet Dent 1953;3:755.
  26. Hartono R. The occlusal plane in relation to facial types. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17(6):549–558. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(67) 90124-2.
  27. Karkazis HC, Polyzois GL. Study of the occlusal plane orientation in complete denture construction. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14(4):399–404. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00735.x.
  28. Solomon EGR, Dent M. The morphology of tragus part 1: the confusion about tragus terminology. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2000;11:11–15.
  29. Clapp GW. Mechanical side of anatomical articulation. New York: The Dental Digest; 1910.
  30. Heartwell CM, Rahn AO. Syllabus of complete dentures, 4th ed., Bombay: Varghese Publishing House; 1992.
  31. The Academy of Prosthodontics: Glossary of Prosthodontic terms, 7th ed., The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1999;81(1):48–110.
  32. Javid NS. A technique for determination of the occlusal plane. J Prosthet Dent 1974;31(3):270–272. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(74)90195-4.
  33. Xie J, Zhao Y, Chao Y, et al. A cephalometric study on determining the orientation of occlusal plane. Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 1993;24(4):422–425.
  34. Niekerk FWV, Miller VJ, Bibby RE. Ala tragus line in complete denture prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53(1):67–69. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90068-x.
  35. Solomon EGR, Dent M, Shetty NS, et al. Part 2: reliability of tragus morphology and its reference to establish Camper's plane. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2000;11:16–22.
  36. Sloane RB, Cook J. A guide to the orientation of the plane of occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1953;3(1):53–65. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(53)90037-7.
  37. Solomon EGR, Dent M, Shetty NS, et al. Part 3: definability of tragus morphology as a reference landmark in edentulous subjects. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2000;11:23–26.
  38. Ansari IH. Panoramic radiographic examination of edentulous jaws. Quintessence Int 1997;28(1):23–26.
  39. Axelsson G. Orthopantomographic examination of the edentulous mouth. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59(5):592–598. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90077-7.
  40. Barrett AP, Waters BE, Griffiths CJ. A critical evaluation of panoramic radiography as a screening procedure in dental practice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;57(6):673–677. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90292-5.
  41. Bremner VA, Grant AA. A radiographic survey of edentulous mouths. Aust Dent J 1971;16(1):17–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1971.tb00975.x.
  42. Coy WA, Wing KR. A roentgenographic examination of fully edentulous patients. Dent Dig 1966;72:200–204.
  43. Dias AP, Jiffry MTM. Orthopantomographic survey of edentulous patients of different age groups in Malaysia. Aust Dent J 1988;33(1): 23–26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1988.tb00622.x.
  44. Jones JD, Seals RR, Schelb E. Panoramic radiographic examination of edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53(4):535–539. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90642-0.
  45. Keng SB, Ow KK, Ho KH. A radiographic survey of edentulous jaws. Singapore Dent J 1981;6(1):15–19.
  46. Tal H, Moses O. A comparision of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20(1):40–42. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20.1.1884852.
  47. Sanders DW. Mental Foramen Location in Humans, MS thesis Houston, Texas: University of Texas Dental Branch; 1972.
  48. Matsumoto M. Morphological changes in the human mandible following the loss of molars and premolars. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1961;8:344–345.
  49. Gabriel AC. Some anatomical features of the mandible. J Anat 1958;92(4):580–586.
  50. Tebo HG, Telford IB. An analysis of the variations in position of the mental foramen. Anat Rec 1950;107(1):61–66. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000445.
  51. Lundquist DO, Luther WW. Occlusal plane determination. J Prosthet Dent 1970;23(5):489–498. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(70)90198-8.
  52. Green RM. The position of the mental foramen: a comparison between the southern (Hong Kong) Chinese and other ethnic and racial groups. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:287–290. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90191-5.
  53. Shankland II WE. The position of the mental foramen in Asian Indians. J Oral Implant 1994;20(2):118–123.
  54. Wang MT, Shih C, Liu JC, et al. A clinical anatomical study of the location of the mental foramen in adult Chinese mandibles. Acta Anat (Basel) 1986;126(1):29–33. DOI: 10.1159/000146182.
  55. Yosue T, Brooks SL. The appearance of mental foramina on panoramic and periapical radiographs. II. Experimental evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68(4):488–492. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(89)90151-5.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.