The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Assessing Flexural Strength Degradation of New Cubic Containing Zirconia Materials

Collin D Holman

Keywords : Degradation, Flexural strength, Zirconia

Citation Information : Holman CD. Assessing Flexural Strength Degradation of New Cubic Containing Zirconia Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (2):114-118.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2762

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Aim: Newer zirconia materials may have greater strength degradation under cyclic fatigue with increased yttria and cubic content. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength (FS) degradation of newer zirconia materials compared to more traditional tetragonal zirconia materials. Materials and methods: The following materials were tested: two 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP) materials (Lava Plus, 3M ESPE; Katana ML, Kuraray), one 4 mol% partially stabilized zirconia (4Y-PSZ) material (Katana STML, Kuraray), two 5 mol% partially stabilized zirconia (5Y-PSZ) materials (Katana STML, Kuraray; Lava Esthetic, 3M ESPE), and one lithium disilicate material (IPS e.max CAD LT, Ivoclar Vivadent). Thirty beams were milled for each ceramic material with final dimensions of 4.0 × 1.3 × 18.0 mm after sintering or crystallization. Each specimen was placed on a 3-point bend test device on a universal testing machine (Instron, Norwood, MA). Flexural strength was determined on 10 beam specimens per group with a central load applied until fracture. Flexural fatigue strength was then measured on the remaining 20 beam specimens per group using the staircase method for 6,000 cycles at 2 Hz. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVAs/Tukey post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Results: A significant difference was found between groups (p < 0.001) per property. The 3Y-TZP zirconia materials had the greatest flexural and flexural fatigue strength. The cubic containing zirconia materials performed more moderately. The lithium disilicate material had the lowest strength values. The percent degradation in flexural fatigue strength of the 3Y-TZP zirconia materials was less than the 5Y-PSZ, Katana UTML, and the 4Y-PSZ, Katana STML, cubic containing materials, but similar to the 5Y-PSZ cubic containing material, Lava Esthetic. Conclusion: The amount of strength degradation was material dependent, with the 4Y-PSZ or 5Y-PSZ cubic containing zirconia materials demonstrating greater or similar strength degradation compared to the primarily tetragonal 3Y-TZP zirconia materials. Clinical significance: The differences in FS degradation between cubic containing materials and traditional zirconia materials could significantly impact the long-term success of these newer materials. Clinicians should be aware that these cubic containing materials may perform differently long-term than the very strong traditional 3Y-TZP materials and to follow manufacturer instructions on required material thickness and indications for use to prevent premature failure of the restoration.

  1. Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. Saunders; 2013.
  2. Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, et al. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res 2013;57(4):236–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001.
  3. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, et al. Fracture rate of monolithic zirconia restorations up to 5 years: a dental laboratory survey. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116(3):436–439. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.033.
  4. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, et al. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(1):10–15. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.126795.
  5. Hannink RHJ, Kelly PM, Muddle BC. Transformation toughening in zirconia-containing ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2004;83(3):461–487. DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01221.x.
  6. Guess PC, Kulis A, Witkowski S, et al. Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dent Mater 2008;24(11):1556–1567. DOI: 10.1016/
  7. Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials: An Overview of Clinical Uses and Considerations [Internet]. American Dental Association. 2017.
  8. IPS e.max: Ivoclar Vivodent, Inc., 2019, available from:
  9. Zhang F, Inokoshi M, Batuk M, et al. Strength, toughness and aging stability of highly-translucent Y-TZP ceramics for dental restorations. Dent Mater 2016;32(12):e327–e337. DOI: 10.1016/ 09.025.
  10. Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater 2014;30(10):1195–1203. DOI: 10.1016/ 08.375.
  11. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Ionescu AM, et al. Color and translucency of zirconia ceramics, human dentine and bovine dentine. J Dent 2012;40(Suppl 2):e34–e40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012. 08.018.
  12. Baldissara P, Llukacej A, Ciocca L, et al. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104(1):6–12. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60086-8.
  13. McLaren EA, Lawson N, Choi J, et al. New high-translucent cubic-phase-containing zirconia: clinical and laboratory considerations and the effect of air abrasion on strength. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2017;38(6):e13–e16.
  14. 3M™ Lava™ Esthetic Fluorescent Full-Contour Zirconia Disc: 3M; 2019, available from:
  15. KATANA Zirconia UTML/STML: Kuraray Noritake; 2019, available from:
  16. Pereira GKR, Guilardi LF, Dapieve KS, et al. Mechanical reliability, fatigue strength and survival analysis of new polycrystalline translucent zirconia ceramics for monolithic restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018;85:57–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.029.
  17. Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, et al. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Dent Mater 2014;30(4):424–432. DOI: 10.1016/
  18. Kwon SJ, Lawson NC, McLaren EE, et al. Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120(1):132–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017. 08.004.
  19. Chevalier J, Gremillard L, Deville S. Low-temperature degradation of zirconia and implications for biomedical implants. Annu Rev Mater Res 2007;37(1):1–32. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506. 084250.
  20. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Shahramian K, et al. Effect of different treatments on the flexural strength of fully versus partially stabilized monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118(2):216–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.031.
  21. Palmero P. Structural ceramic nanocomposites: a review of properties and powders’ synthesis methods. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2015;5(2):656–696. DOI: 10.3390/nano5020656.
  22. Pande CS, Cooper KP. Nanomechanics of Hall–Petch relationship in nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 2009;54(6):689–706. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.008.
  23. International Organization for Standardization TCIT, Dentistry. Dentistry: Ceramic Materials (ISO 6872:2015): European Committee for Standardization, 2015; 2015.
  24. Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, et al. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73(8):602–608. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2015.1007479.
  25. Campos F, Valandro LF, Feitosa SA, et al. Adhesive cementation promotes higher fatigue resistance to zirconia crowns. Oper Dent 2016;42(2):215–224. DOI: 10.2341/16-002-L.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.