The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison of the Resistance of Bond Strength of Cemented Fiberglass Posts in Different Root Thirds with and without Silanization: An Ex Vivo Study

Gareth Robles, Gustavo Huertas-Mogollón, Yens Mendoza-Martiarena, Gerardo Ayala, Romel Watanabe

Keywords : Bond strength, Ex vivo study, Fiberglass post, Silane

Citation Information : Robles G, Huertas-Mogollón G, Mendoza-Martiarena Y, Ayala G, Watanabe R. Comparison of the Resistance of Bond Strength of Cemented Fiberglass Posts in Different Root Thirds with and without Silanization: An Ex Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (3):261-266.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2774

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 23-07-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To compare the application of silane in the bond strength of fiberglass posts in different thirds of the cemented root with a self-adhesive system in an ex vivo study. Materials and methods: Freshly extracted teeth were collected, which had indication of extraction for periodontal or orthodontic reasons. The study evaluated n = 42 specimens that were divided into two large groups: I (control, without silane) and II (with silane); the resistance to adhesion in the respective thirds of the root (cervical, middle, and apical) was also evaluated. The prefabricated fiberglass posts were cemented with and without silane according to the manufacturer\'s instructions and were cemented with a resin-based cementing agent. The adhesion strength test was evaluated by the universal testing machine. Results: According to the results of this experimental trial, the fiberglass posts that did not receive silane had the highest adhesion strength of 26.5 ± 10.6 MPa, while silane-cemented posts only had 21.7 ± 8.1 MPa. The statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and work with a level of significance of p < 0.05. Conclusion: The use of silane as part of the cementing protocol in fiberglass posts does not influence the adhesion strength between the surfaces of the posts and the resin cement because there were statistically significant differences between both adhesion protocols. Clinical significance: This study has a great impact because according to the results, clinical decisions can be made when cementing the fiberglass posts through the application of silane or not.


PDF Share
  1. Stewardson DA. Non-metal post systems. Dent Updat 2001;28(7):326–332. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2001.28.7.326.
  2. Michalakis K, Hirayama H, Sfolkos S. Light transmission of posts and cores used for the anterior esthetic region. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2004;24(5):462–469. DOI: 10.11607/prd.00.0599.
  3. Stefan P, Werder P. Clinical success of zirconium oxide posts with resin composite or glass ceramic cores in endodontically treated teeth: a 4-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(5):524–528.
  4. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006;22(8):752–758. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.002.
  5. Demiryurek E, Kulunk S, Sarac D, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:74–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.047.
  6. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71(6):565–567. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90438-3.
  7. Aksornmuang J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, et al. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. J Dent 2004;32(6):443–450. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.03.001.
  8. Pinheiro de Moraes A, Cenci M, Ratto de Moraes R, et al. Current concepts on the use and adhesive bonding of glass-fiber posts in dentistry: A review. Appl Adhes Sci 2013;1:1. DOI: 10.1186/2196-4351-1-1.
  9. Mendoza D, Eakle W, Kahl E, et al. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78(1):10–14. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70081-7.
  10. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: An SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001;17(5):422–429. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00102-0.
  11. Sahmali S, Demirel F, Saygili G. Comparison of in vitro tensile bond strengths of luting cements to metallic and tooth-colored posts. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2004;24(3):256–263.
  12. Bell A, Lassila L, Kangasniemi I, et al. Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin. J Dent 2005;33(7):533–539. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.014.
  13. Matinlinna J, Lassila L, Ozcan M, et al. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(2):155–164.
  14. Davis P, Melo L, Foxton R, et al. Flexural strength of glass fibre-reinforced posts bonded to dual-cure composite resin cements. Eur J Oral Sci 2010;118(2):197–201. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00721.x.
  15. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, et al. The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dual-cured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts: Microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation. J Dent 2007;35(6):496–502. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.009.
  16. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, et al. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2006;39(10):809–818. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01155.x.
  17. Albaladejo A, Osorio R, Papacchini F, et al. Post silanization improves bond strength of translucent posts to flowable composite resins. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;82(2):320–324. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30736.
  18. Goracci C, Sadek F, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intra-radicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30(5):627–635.
  19. Cekic-Nagas I, Sukuroglu E, Canay S. Does the surface treatment affect the bond strength of various fibre-post systems to resin-core materials? J Dent 2011;39(2):171–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010. 11.008.
  20. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Nagas E, et al. Comparison between regional micropush-out and microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66(2):73–81. DOI: 10.1080/00016350801958266.
  21. Kienanen P, Alander P, Lassila LVJ, et al. Bonding of ceramic insert to a laboratory particle filler composite. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63(5):272–277. DOI: 10.1080/00016350510020025.
  22. Sadek F, Monticelli F, Goracci C, et al. Bond strength performance of different resin composites used as core materials around fiber posts. Dent Mater 2007;23(1):95–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005. 12.005.
  23. Goracci C, Tavares A, Fabianelli A, et al. The adhesión between fiber posts and root canal walls: Comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112(4):353–361. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00146.x.
  24. Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson C, et al. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater 2012;18(7):495–502. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00065-3.
  25. Chapell R, Cobb C, Spencer P, et al. Dentin tubule anastomosis: a potential factor in dentinal adhesive bonding? J Prosthet Dent 1994;72(2):183–188. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90078-7.
  26. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmusse E, et al. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2003;5(2):153–162.
  27. Cecchin D, Farina A, Vitti R, et al. Acid etching and surface coating of glass-fiber posts: bond strength and interface analysis. Braz Dent J 2016;27(2):228–233. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201600722.
  28. Pyun J, Shin T, Lee J, et al. Effects of hydrogen peroxide pretreatment and heat activation of silane on the shear bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite posts to resin cement. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8(2):94–100. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.2.94.
  29. Belwalkar V, Gade J, Mankar N. Comparison of the effect of shear bond strength with silane and other three chemical presurface treatments of a glass fiber-reinforced post on adhesión with a resin-based luting agent: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2016;7(2):193–197. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.183056.
  30. Archana CH, Krishna Raju SM, Yadhav SS, et al. Effect of surface pretreatment and thermal Activation of silane coupling agent on bond strength of fiber posts to resin cement. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(11):1293–1296. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2687.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.