The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 8 ( August, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Anatomical Investigation of Middle Mesial Canals of Mandibular Molars in a Middle Eastern Population: A Cross-sectional Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study

Elyssia Inaty, Carla Jabre, Gaby Haddad, Walid Nehme, Issam Khalil, Alfred Naaman, Carla Zogheib

Citation Information : Inaty E, Jabre C, Haddad G, Nehme W, Khalil I, Naaman A, Zogheib C. Anatomical Investigation of Middle Mesial Canals of Mandibular Molars in a Middle Eastern Population: A Cross-sectional Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (8):910-915.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2920

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-12-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Aim: To identify the prevalence of middle mesial canals (MMC) in mandibular molars in a Lebanese population to determine the relationship between MMC and different factors (age, sex, and tooth type) and to examine the canal's morphological aspects (category, length, orifice position, and dentin width toward furcation). Materials and methods: The presence of MMC in the mesial roots of 505 mandibular molars of 200 patients was analyzed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Then, the position of the MMC orifices with respect to the pulpal floor and the main canals orifices, and the width of dentin along the canal toward the furcation were determined using 3D Slicer 4.10.1. Results: In all, 14.65% of the first and second mandibular molars presented an MMC. A higher frequency of confluent canals was noted mostly joining the mesiobuccal canal (MBC). Gender appears to be a factor influencing the prevalence of MMCs, contrary to age-groups and tooth type. In mandibular first molars, the orifice is located at a mean distance of 1.22 ± 0.44 mm from the pulpal floor, 1.42 ± 0.53 mm from the MBC orifice, and 1.57 ± 0.60 mm from the mesiolingual canal (MLC) orifice. The width of dentin toward the furcation varies between 0.95 and 2.29 mm. In mandibular second molars, the orifice is located at a mean distance of 1.00 ± 0.51 mm from the pulpal floor, 1.39 ± 0.60 mm from the MBC orifice, and 1.37 ± 0.50 mm from MLC orifice. The width of dentin toward the furcation varies between 0.71 mm and 2.22 mm. Conclusion: Middle mesial canal is present in 14.65% of mandibular molars in the Lebanese population, with its orifice located under the pulpal floor. The majority of MMCs join the MBC. Clinical significance: Middle mesial canal is not a rare finding in the Lebanese population (14.65%). Clinicians should take time to search for this canal in the isthmus between the main mesial canals.

  1. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58(5):589–599. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9.
  2. Villas-Bôas MH, Bernardineli N, Cavenago BC, et al. Micro-computed tomography study of the internal anatomy of mesial root canals of mandibular molars. J Endod 2011;37(12):1682–1686. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.001.
  3. Vertucci FJ, Williams RG. Root canal anatomy of the mandibular first molar. J N J Dent Assoc 1974;45(3):27–28.
  4. Pomeranz HH, Eidelman DL, Goldberg MG. Treatment considerations of the middle mesial canal of mandibular first and second molars. J Endod 1981;7(12):565–568. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80216-6.
  5. Kim S-Y, Kim BS, Woo J, et al. Morphology of mandibular first molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals. J Endod 2013;39(12):1516–1521. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.015.
  6. Azim AA, Deutsch AS, Solomon CS. Prevalence of middle mesial canals in mandibular molars after guided troughing under high magnification: an in vivo investigation. J Endod 2015;41(2):164–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.013.
  7. Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet J-P, et al. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod 2010;36(7):1187–1190. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.029.
  8. de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Péix Sánchez M, et al. Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: a systematic review. J Endod 2010;36(12):1919–1931. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.055.
  9. Lee K-W, Kim Y, Perinpanayagam H, et al. Comparison of alternative image reformatting techniques in micro-computed tomography and tooth clearing for detailed canal morphology. J Endod 2014;40(3):417–422. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.014.
  10. Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Versiani MA, et al. Comparative accuracy of the clearing technique, CBCT and micro-CT methods in studying the mesial root canal configuration of mandibular first molars. Int Endod J 2017;50(1):90–96. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12593.
  11. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod 2010b;36(9):1547–1551. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.008.
  12. Zhang R, Wang H, Tian YY, et al. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular molars in Chinese individuals. Int Endod J 2011;44(11):990–999. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01904.x.
  13. Martins JNR, Marques D, Silva EJNL, et al. Prevalence studies on root canal anatomy using cone beam computed tomography imaging: a systematic review. J Endod 2019;45(4):372–386. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.12.016.
  14. Nosrat A, Deschenes RJ, Tordik PA, et al. Middle mesial canals in mandibular molars: incidence and related factors. J Endod 2015;41(1):28–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.004.
  15. Versiani MA, Ordinola-Zapata R, Keleş A, et al. Middle mesial canals in mandibular first molars: a micro-CT study in different populations. Arch Oral Biol 2016;61:130–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015. 10.020.
  16. Gu Y, Lu Q, Wang H, et al. Root canal morphology of permanent three-rooted mandibular first molars—part I: pulp floor and root canal system. J Endod 2010;36(6):990–994. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010. 02.030.
  17. Keles A, Keskin C. Deviations of mesial root canals of mandibular first molar teeth at the apical third: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 2018;44(6):1030–1032. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.028.
  18. de Toubes KMPS, de Souza Côrtes MI, de Abreu Valadares MA, et al. Comparative analysis of accessory mesial canal identification in mandibular first molars by using four different diagnostic methods. J Endod 2012;38(4):436–441. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.035.
  19. Karapinar-Kazandag M, Basrani BR, Friedman S. The operating microscope enhances detection and negotiation of accessory mesial canals in mandibular molars. J Endod 2010;36(8):1289–1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.005.
  20. Chavda SM, Garg SA. Advanced methods for identification of middle mesial canal in mandibular molars: an in vitro study. Endodontology 2016;28(2):92–96. DOI: 10.4103/0970-7212.195425.
  21. Fabra-Campos H. Unusual root anatomy of mandibular first molars. J Endod 1985;11(12):568–572. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80204-1.
  22. Martinez-Berna A, Badanelli P. Mandibular first molars with six root canals. J Endod 1985;11(8):348–352. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80043-1.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.