The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 9 ( September, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effect of Toothbrushing on Surface Color of Ceramic-polymer Materials: An In Vitro Study

Farzan L Pouranfar, Ryan Sheridan, Cade Salmon, Kraig S Vandewalle

Keywords : Ceramic polymers, Extrinsic stains, Lithium disilicate, Surface color, Toothbrushing

Citation Information : Pouranfar FL, Sheridan R, Salmon C, Vandewalle KS. Effect of Toothbrushing on Surface Color of Ceramic-polymer Materials: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (9):1054-1058.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2933

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 22-01-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim and objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of toothbrushing on the change in color of extrinsic characterization of ceramic-polymer materials. Materials and methods: Two ceramic-polymer materials (CeraSmart, GC; Enamic, VITA) and one lithium-disilicate material (IPS e.max CAD; Ivoclar Vivadent) were tested. Specimens of each material were prepared, characterized, and glazed per manufacturer's instructions. The treated surface of the blocks were then brushed in a toothpaste slurry with artificial saliva using a toothbrush machine with a soft toothbrush. Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage (CIE) L*a*b* values were recorded with a spectrophotometer at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 simulated years of brushing (7,300 strokes/year). A mean change in color (ΔE*) and standard deviation was determined for each group and brushing interval. Data were analyzed with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA examining the effects of toothbrushing the ceramic materials on ΔE* over time (α = 0.05). Results: The difference in the ΔE* between CeraSmart and Enamic was significant at 3 years, while the differences between them were not significant at 6, 9, and 12 years of simulated brushing. The ΔE* of IPS e.max CAD was significantly lower than CeraSmart and Enamic at all time points (all p < 0.0001) except for the comparison with Enamic at 3 years. Conclusion: The extrinsic stains on the ceramic-polymer materials may be more susceptible to change from simulated toothbrushing compared to the lithium-disilicate material. Clinical significance: Toothbrushing may change the color of extrinsic characterization of ceramic-polymer materials. However, the change may remain clinically imperceptible to the naked eye (ΔE* > 1.0) for nearly 6 equivalent years of brushing.

HTML PDF Share
  1. Bativala F, Weiner S, Berendsen P, et al. The microscopic appearance and effect of toothbrushing on extrinsically stained metal-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57(1):47–52. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90115-6.
  2. Lund TW, Schwabacher WB, Goodkind RJ. Spectrophotometric study of the relationship between body porcelain color and applied metallic oxide pigments. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53(6):790–796. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90158-1.
  3. Aker DA, Aker JR, Sorensen SE. Toothbrush abrasion of color-corrective porcelain stains applied to porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44(2):161–163. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90130-4.
  4. Anil N, Bolay S. Effect of toothbrushing on the material loss, roughness, and color of intrinsically and extrinsically stained porcelain used in metal-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15(5):483–487.
  5. Featherstone DB, Domejean-Orliaguet S, Jenson L, et al. Caries risk assessment in practice for age 6 through adult. J Calif Dent Assoc 2007;35(10):703–713.
  6. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Danser MM, et al. Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25(5):413–416. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02464.x.
  7. Arai T, Kinoshita S. A comparison of plaque removal by different toothbrushes and toothbrushing methods. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1977;24(2):177–188.
  8. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, et al. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28(3):227–235. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4244.
  9. Nasr E, Makhlouf AC, Zebouni E, et al. All-ceramic computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing restorations: evolution of structures and criteria for clinical application. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(4):516–523. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2549.
  10. 3M ESPE. Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM Restorative. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/756167O/3m-lava-ultimate-cad-cam-restorative-for-cerec-the-edge-you-need.pdf Accessed April 14, 2020.
  11. VITA Enamic [technical and scientific documentation]. https://cdn.vivarep.com/contrib/vivarep/media/pdf/4_4642_ENAMICTechnicalandScientific_20170830205744578.pdf. February 2018. Accessed April 14, 2020.
  12. Ivoclar Vivadent technical, version 7 2017. http://www.ivoclarvivadent.com/zoolu-website/media/document/4611/Programat+P300%2C+P500%2C+P700%2C+EP+3000%2C+EP+5000+-+Firing+program+tables.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2020.
  13. VITA Enamic Bonding Protocol. https://cdn.vivarep.com/contrib/vivarep/media/pdf/4_4643_VITAENAMICBondingandPolishingGuide_20170830205802515.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2020.
  14. GC, Optiglaze color instructions for use: http://www.gcamerica.com/products/digital/OPTIGLAZE_color/OPTIGLAZE-color-IFU12L.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2020.
  15. GC America. CeraSmart [instructions for use]. June 2016. http://www.gcamerica.com/products/digital/CERASMART/CERASMART_12IFU.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2020.
  16. Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF, Dennison JB, et al. Clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays after 10 years. J Cosmet Dent 2013;28:134–145.
  17. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, et al. All-ceramic or metal ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systemic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015 31(6):603–623. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011.
  18. Manly RS. The abrasion of cementum and dentin by modern dentifrices. J Dent Res 1941;20(6):583–595. DOI: 10.1177/00220345410200060901.
  19. Lata S, Varghese NO, Varughese JM. Remineralization potential of fluoride and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phosphor peptide on enamel lesions: an in-vitro comparative evaluation. J Conserv Dent 2010;13(1):42–46. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.62634.
  20. Khashayar G, Bain PA, Salari S, et al. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry. J Dent 2014;42(6):637–644. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.017.
  21. Guth JF, Zuch T, Zwinge S, et al. Optical properties of manually and CAD/CAM-fabricated polymers. Dent Mater J 2013;32(6):865–871. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2013-099.
  22. Aroucha MA, Basilio J, Llopis J, et al. Colour stainability of indirect CAD-CAM processed composites vs. conventionally laboratory processed composites after immersion in staining solutions. J Dent 2014;42(7):831–838. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.002.
  23. Garza LA, Thompson G, Cho SH, et al. Effect of toothbrushing on shade and surface roughness on extrinsically stained pressable ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115(4):489–494. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.013.
  24. Partin-Agarwal K, Terwilliger RJ, Lien W, et al. Polish retention of ceramic-polymer CAD/CAM materials. Gen Dent 2018;66(6):65–70.
  25. Mörmann WH, Stawarczyk B, Ender A, et al. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and martens hardness. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;20:113–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013. 01.003.
  26. Koizumi H, Saiki O, Nogawa H, et al. Surface roughness and gloss of current CAD/CAM resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion. Dent Mater J 2015;34(6):881–887. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2015-177.
  27. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, et al. Wedged cervical lesions produced by toothbrushing. Am J Dent 2004;17(4):237–240.
  28. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Analysis of composite type and different sources of polymerization light on in vitro toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion resistance. J Dent 2000;28(5):355–359. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00014-2.
  29. Saxer UP, Barbakow J, Yankell SL. New studies on estimated and actual toothbrushing times and dentifrice use. J Clin Dent 1998;9(2):49–51.
  30. Kulkarni A, Rothrock J, Thompson J. Impact of gastric acid induced surface changes on mechanical behavior and optical characteristics of dental ceramics. J Prosthodont 2020;29(3):207–218. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12716.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.