The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 12 ( December, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Caries Preventive and Antibacterial Effects of Two Natural Mouthwashes vs Chlorhexidine in High Caries-risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Dina Kamal, Hassan Hassanein, Mai Akah, Mostafa A Abdelkawy, Heba Hamza

Citation Information : Kamal D, Hassanein H, Akah M, Abdelkawy MA, Hamza H. Caries Preventive and Antibacterial Effects of Two Natural Mouthwashes vs Chlorhexidine in High Caries-risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (12):1316-1324.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2986

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 13-04-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Aim and objective: To evaluate the caries preventive and antibacterial effects of Gum Arabic and Licorice mouthwashes vs chlorhexidine in high caries-risk patients. The prevalence of oral side effects from using the mouthwashes was also assessed. Materials and methods: Total 63 participants categorized as high caries-risk according to the CAMBRA caries-risk model were recruited. They were randomly allocated to three groups (n = 21) according to the mouthwash used: G1 (Gum Arabic), G2 (Licorice), and G3 (Chlorhexidine). Baseline DMF scores and saliva samples were obtained. DMF scores, salivary Streptococcus mutans (SM) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA) counts, and any reported oral side effects were recorded after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The obtained results were subjected to the statistical analysis and the significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Regarding DMF scores, no statistically significant difference was found between the three groups at baseline, after 3, 6, and 9 months. After 12 months, a statistically significant difference was found between G3 and each of G1 and G2 where G3 showed significantly higher DMF scores (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between G1 and G2. Regarding antibacterial activity, after 6 months, all mouthwashes showed statistically significant antibacterial effect against SM and LA with no statistically significant difference between them (p < 0.001). After 9 and 12 months, G1 and G2 showed a statistically significant reduction in SM and LA counts (p < 0.001). However, G3 showed a statistically significant increase in SM and LA counts indicating bacterial resistance (p < 0.001). No oral side effects were reported in G1 and G2. On the other hand, several oral side effects were reported in G3. Conclusion: Gum Arabic and Licorice mouthwashes show promising caries preventive and antibacterial effects with no oral side effects reported. Clinical significance: Natural mouthwashes can serve as substitutes to chemical agents as chlorhexidine, providing effective caries control and safe long-term use.

  1. Cheng J, Chaffee BW, Cheng NF, et al. Understanding treatment effect mechanisms of the CAMBRA randomized trial in reducing caries increment. J Dent Res 2015;94(1):44–51. DOI: 10.1177/0022034514555365.
  2. Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, et al. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017;3(1):17030. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.30.
  3. Horst JA, Tanzer JM, Milgrom PM. Fluorides and other preventive strategies for tooth decay. Dent Clin North Am 2018;62(2):207–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2017.11.003.
  4. Singhal R, Agarwal V, Rastogi P, et al. Efficacy of acacia arabica gum as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Saudi Dent J 2018;30(1):53–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.10.006.
  5. Almaz ME, Sönmez IŞ, Ökte Z, et al. Efficacy of a sugar-free herbal lollipop for reducing salivary Streptococcus mutans levels: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21(3):839–845. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1827-y.
  6. Hambire CU, Jawade R, Patil A, et al. Comparing the antiplaque efficacy of 0.5% camellia sinensis extract, 0.05% sodium fluoride, and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in children. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5(3):218–226. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.158016.
  7. Jain E, Pandey RK, Khanna R. Liquorice root extracts as potent cariostatic agents in pediatric practice. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013;31(3):146–152. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.117964.
  8. James P, Worthington HV, Parnell C, et al. Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;3:CD008676. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008676.pub2.
  9. Somaraj V, Shenoy RP, Shenoy PG, et al. Effect of herbal and fluoride mouth rinses on Streptococcus mutans and dental caries among 12–15–year–old school children: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Dent 2017;2017:5654373. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5654373.
  10. Krishnakumar G, Gaviappa D, Guruswamy S. Anticaries efficacy of liquorice lollipop: an ex vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(8):937–942. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2361.
  11. Rao DS, Penmatsa T, Kumar AK, et al. Antibacterial activity of aqueous extracts of Indian chewing sticks on dental plaque: an in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2014;6(Suppl 1):S140–S145. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.137426.
  12. Banjar MM, Khafaji AM, Maher YA. Antimicrobial activity of hydrogen peroxide, sesame and gum Arabic against Streptococcus mutans. Int J Health Sci Res 2017;7(1):97–104.
  13. Khan MN, Ngassapa O, Matee MI. Antimicrobial activity of Tanzanian chewing sticks against oral pathogenic microbes. Pharm Biol 2000;38(3):235–240. DOI: 10.1076/1388-0209(200007)3831-sft235.
  14. Jain I, Jain P. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of three different formulations of mouth rinses with multi-herbal mouth rinse. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2016;34(4):315–323. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.191409.
  15. PeRala SR, Bhupathiraju P. Efficacy of four fluoride mouth rinses on Streptococcus mutans in high caries risk children–a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(9):ZC56–ZC60. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16107.8508.
  16. Vadhana VC, Sharath A, Geethapriya PR, et al. Effect of sesame oil, ozonated sesame oil, and chlorhexidine mouthwash on oral health status of adolescents: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2019;37(4):365–371. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_244_19.
  17. Polizzi E, Tetè G, Bova F, et al. Antibacterial properties and side effects of chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes. A prospective, randomized clinical study. J Osseointegr 2020;12(1):2–7. DOI: 10.23805/JO.2019.12.01.20.
  18. Patil RU, Dastoor PP, Unde MP. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial effectiveness of probiotic milk and fluoride mouthrinse on salivary Streptococcus mutans counts and plaque scores in children–an in vivo experimental study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2019;37(4):378–382. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_45_19.
  19. Qudeimat MA, Altarakemah Y, Alomari Q, et al. The impact of ICDAS on occlusal caries treatment recommendations for high caries risk patients: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2019;19(1):41. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0730-8.
  20. Li R, Lo EC, Liu BY, et al. Randomized clinical trial on preventing root caries among community-dwelling elders. JDR Clin Trans Res 2017;2(1):66–72. DOI: 10.1177/2380084416668491.
  21. Mitchell JK, Brackett MG, Haywood VB. Strategies to avoid underdiagnosing pit-and-fissure caries. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2018;39(2):79–83.
  22. Oliveira BH, Salazar M, Carvalho DM, et al. Biannual fluoride varnish applications and caries incidence in preschoolers: a 24-month follow-up randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Caries Res 2014;48(3):228–236. DOI: 10.1159/000356863.
  23. Sedighinia F, Afshar AS. Antibacterial activity of Glycyrrhiza glabra against oral pathogens: an in vitro study. Avicenna J Phytomed 2012;2(3):118–124.
  24. Haghgoo R, Mehran M, Zadeh HF, et al. Comparison between antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine 0.2% and different concentrations of Cyperus rotundus extract: an in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2017;7(5):242–246. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_157_17.
  25. Akhlaghi N, Sadeghi M, Fazeli F, et al. The antibacterial effects of coffee extract, chlorhexidine, and fluoride against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus plantarum: an in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2019;16(5):346–353. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.266093.
  26. Elgamily H, Safy R, Makharita R. Influence of medicinal plant extracts on the growth of oral pathogens Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: an in-vitro study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019;7(14):2328–2334. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.653.
  27. Hu C, He J, Eckert R, et al. Development and evaluation of a safe and effective sugar-free herbal lollipop that kills cavity-causing bacteria. Int J Oral Sci 2011;3(1):13–20. DOI: 10.4248/IJOS11005.
  28. Okoro SO, Kawo AH, Arzai AH. Phytochemical screening, antibacterial and toxicological activities of acacia senegal extracts. Bayero J Pure Appl Sci 2012;5(1):163–170. DOI: 10.4314/bajopas.v5i1.29.
  29. Al Alawi SM, Hossain MA, Abusham AA. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic comparative study of different extracts of Omani and Sudanese gum acacia. Beni-Suef Uni J Basic Appl Sci 2018;7(1):22–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjbas.2017.10.007.
  30. Megalaa N, Thirumurugan K, Kayalvizhi G, et al. A comparative evaluation of the anticaries efficacy of herbal extracts (tulsi and black myrobalans) and sodium fluoride as mouthrinses in children: a randomized controlled trial. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29(6):760–767. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_790_16.
  31. Salama MT, Alsughier ZA. Effect of green tea extract mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans counts in a group of preschool children: an in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(2):133–138. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1610.
  32. Ravindran S, Chaudhary M, Gawande M. Enumeration of salivary streptococci and lactobacilli in children with differing caries experiences in a rural Indian population. ISRN Plast Surg 2013;2013:476783. DOI: 10.5402/2013/476783.
  33. Al-Jumaily EF, AL-Seubehawy HM, Al-Toraihy FA. Isolation and identification of Streptococcus mutans (H5) produced glucosyltransferase and cell-associated glucosyltransferase isolated from dental caries. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2014;3(6):850–864.
  34. Shah S, Bargale S, Dave BH, et al. Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of (between) 0.2% chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans: a randomized controlled pilot study. Contemp Clin Dent 2018;9(3):440–445. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_264_18.
  35. Moini P, Eslami G, Taheri S, et al. In vitro comparative evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of licorice aqueous root extract (Glycyrrhiza glabra) and chlorhexidine against Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci 2016;1(2):7–14. DOI: 10.29252/jrdms.1.2.7.
  36. Guerra F, Pasqualotto D, Rinaldo F, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes and its adverse events: performance-related evaluation of mouthwashes added with anti-discoloration system and cetylpyridinium chloride. Int J Dent Hyg 2019;17(3):229–236. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12371.
  37. Haydari M, Bardakci AG, Koldsland OC, et al. Comparing the effect of 0.06%-, 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine on plaque, bleeding and side effects in an experimental gingivitis model: a parallel group, double masked randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2017;17(1):118. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0400-7.
  38. Thomas A, Thakur S, Habib R. Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of green tea, garlic with lime, and sodium fluoride mouth rinses against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacilli species, and Candida albicans in children: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):234–239. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1442.
  39. Ajagannanavar SL, Battur H, Shamarao S, et al. Effect of aqueous and alcoholic licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) root extract against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus in comparison to chlorhexidine: an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(4):29–34.
  40. Bafna H, Ajithkrishnan C, Kalantharakath T, et al. Effect of short-term consumption of amul probiotic yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 on salivary Streptococcus mutans count in high caries risk individuals. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2018;8(2):111–115. DOI: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_447_16.
  41. Öznurhan F, Buldur B, Cartı Ö, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine and licorice mouthwashes in children. Meandros Med Dent J 2019;20(1):13–19. DOI: 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2018.79663.
  42. Sharma A, Agarwal N, Anand A, et al. To compare the effectiveness of different mouthrinses on Streptococcus mutans count in caries active children. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2018;8(2):113–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2018.05.002.
  43. Tadakamadla SK, Bharathwaj VV, Duraiswamy P, et al. Clinical efficacy of a new cetylpyridinium chloride-hyaluronic acid-based mouthrinse compared to chlorhexidine and placebo mouthrinses–A 21-day randomized clinical trial. Int J Dent Hyg 2020;18(1):116–123. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12413.
  44. Jothika M, Vanajassun PP, Someshwar B. Effectiveness of probiotic, chlorhexidine and fluoride mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans–randomized, single-blind, in vivo study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5(Suppl 1):S44–S48. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.156153.
  45. Mitra D, Yadav A, Prithyani S, et al. The antiplaque efficacy of lantibiotic Nisin extract mouthrinse. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2019;23(1):31–34. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_326_18.
  46. Sidhu P, Shankargouda S, Rath A, et al. Therapeutic benefits of liquorice in dentistry. J Ayurveda Integr Med 2020;11(1):82–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2017.12.004.
  47. Magnini RD, Hilou A, Millogo-Koné H, et al. Acacia senegal extract rejuvenates the activity of phenicols on selected enterobacteriaceae multi drug resistant strains. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020;9(6):323. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9060323.
  48. Patel S, Goyal A. Applications of natural polymer gum arabic: a review. Int J Food Prop 2015;18(5):986–998. DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2013. 809541.
  49. Paramita N, Soufyan A, Irawan B, et al. Effect of gum arabic (Acacia senegal) topical gel application on demineralized enamel hardness. J Phys Conf Ser 2018;1073(3):032016. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1073/3/032016.
  50. Kulik EM, Waltimo T, Weiger R, et al. Development of resistance of mutans streptococci and Porphyromonas gingivalis to chlorhexidine digluconate and amine fluoride/stannous fluoride-containing mouthrinses, in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19(6):1547–1553. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1379-y.
  51. Wang S, Zhou C, Ren B, et al. Formation of persisters in Streptococcus mutans biofilms induced by antibacterial dental monomer. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2017;28(11):178. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-017-5981-9.
  52. Kaspar JR, Godwin MJ, Velsko IM, et al. Spontaneously arising Streptococcus mutans variants with reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine display genetic defects and diminished fitness. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019;63(7):e00161-19. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00161-19.
  53. Tandon S, Gupta K, Rao S, et al. Effect of triphala mouthwash on the caries status. Int J Ayurveda Res 2010;1(2):93–99. DOI: 10.4103/0974-7788.64413.
  54. Gupta D, Gupta RK. Investigation of antibacterial efficacy of Acacia nilotica against salivary mutans streptococci: a randomized control trial. Gen Dent 2015;63(1):23–27.
  55. Abdulkareem AA, Al Marah ZA, Abdulbaqi HR, et al. A randomized double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of chlorhexidine, antioxidant, and hyaluronic acid mouthwashes in the management of biofilm-induced gingivitis. Int J Dent Hyg 2020;18(3):268–277. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12432.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.