The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 12 ( December, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effectiveness of WhatsApp as a Part of a Hybrid Learning Environment: An Opportunity for Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Pedagogy

Alla T Alsharif, Bashair Alsharif, Lina Alsharif, Nebras Althagafi, Zuhair S Natto, Saba Kassim

Citation Information : Alsharif AT, Alsharif B, Alsharif L, Althagafi N, Natto ZS, Kassim S. Effectiveness of WhatsApp as a Part of a Hybrid Learning Environment: An Opportunity for Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Pedagogy. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (12):1331-1336.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2978

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 13-04-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim and objective: This study sought to examine the effectiveness of hybrid learning utilizing WhatsApp as an adjunct to traditional learning in delivering knowledge to and supporting the learning of undergraduate dental students and investigate learner perceptions of WhatsApp use in educational contexts. Materials and methods: The 3-month prospective analytical interventional study sampled 85 undergraduate students from the Department of Preventive Dental Sciences. A WhatsApp group was created, information was sent to the male and female groups, and a written assignment was used as a performance benchmark of knowledge acquisition and application. Perceptions of e-learning through WhatsApp were assessed using a previously validated and published questionnaire. Collected data underwent descriptive and bivariate analyses (unpaired t-test). Results: The average assignment scores of the 85 hybrid learners were statistically significantly higher than those of traditional learners from the previous academic year (34 ± 1 vs 26 ± 3; p < 0.05, respectively). Meanwhile, 57 hybrid learners completed the survey, and 73% agreed/strongly agreed that introducing a new method of teaching via WhatsApp was useful, 70% reported that a professional and comfortable learning environment was created, and 70% felt that group distractions were handled appropriately. The top advantages of learning through WhatsApp were availability/immediacy (94.7%) and being simple to operate (91.2%). Males (40.4%) were significantly more likely to report a sense of belonging to the group than females (33.3%, p = 0.01). Respondents agreed that high expectations of teacher availability (71.9%) and some students making no effort (52.6%) were challenges. Message flooding (45.6%) and time-consuming nature of WhatsApp (36.8%) were identified as technical challenges. Conclusion: The findings showed significant improvements in student performance using the hybrid learning tool, as reflected in assignment scores. Positive perceptions of hybrid learning and improved academic performance indicate that WhatsApp is a convenient new teaching tool. Clinical significance: The results of this study may be applicable to other clinical dental disciplines.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Amry A. The impact of WhatsApp mobile social learning on the achievement and attitudes of female students compared with face to face learning in the classroom. ESJ 2014;10(22):116–136.
  2. Plana M, Gibert M, Triana I, et al., Improving learners’ reading skills through instant short messages: a sample study using WhatsApp. Paper presented at World-CALL 2013-CALL: Sustainability and Computer-Assisted Language Learning 2013;80–84.
  3. Bansal D, Joshi T. A study of students experiences of WhatsApp mobile learning. GJHSS 2014;14(4). Retrieved from https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/1326
  4. Hayes S, Smith S, Shea P. Expanding learning presence to account for the direction of regulative intent: Self-, co- and shared regulation in online learning. OLJ 2015;19(3):1–19. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v19i3.530.
  5. Alenazi A. WhatsApp messenger as a learning tool: an investigation of pre-service teachers’ learning without instructor presence. J Educ Training Stud 2017;6(1):1. DOI: 10.11114/jets.v6i1.2684.
  6. WhatsApp Inc. WhatsApp features. WhatsApp Inc, 2020. https://www.whatsapp.com/features/.
  7. Cohavi A. How did WhatsApp became the strongest social network?. Calcalist 2013:218.
  8. Barhoumi C. The effectiveness of WhatsApp mobile learning activities guided by activity theory on students’ knowledge management. Contemp Educ Technol 2015;6(3):221–238. DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/6151.
  9. Bouhnik D, Deshen M. WhatsApp goes to school: mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. JITE: research 2014;13:217–231. DOI: 10.28945/2051.
  10. Gon S, Rawekar A. Effectivity of e- learning through WhatsApp as a teaching learning tool. MVP J Med Sci 2017;4(1):40–46. DOI: 10.18311/mvpjms/0/v0/i0/8454.
  11. Pence HE. Preparing for the real web generation. JETS 2007;35(3):347–356. DOI: 10.2190/7116-G776-7P42-V110.
  12. Latif M, Hussain I, Saeed R, et al. Use of smart phones and social media in medical education: trends, advantages, challenges and barriers. Acta Inform Med 2019;27(2):133–138. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2019.27. 133-138.
  13. Zulfikar I, Zaheer F, Qamarudin Baloch Ahmad F. The new face of learning: social media innovating medical education. Int J Educ Psychol Res 2018;4(1):1–5. DOI: 10.4103/jepr.jepr_73_16.
  14. Du X, Zhang M, Shelton B, et al. Learning anytime, anywhere: a spatio-temporal analysis for online learning. Interact Learn Environ 2019. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1633546.
  15. Kline P. Handbook of Psychological Testing. 2nd ed., London, UK: Routledge; 2000. p. 752.
  16. Rambe P, Chipunza C, Using mobile devices to leverage student access to collaboratively-generated resources: A case of WhatsApp instant messaging. International Conference on Advanced Information and Technology for Education: South African University 2013 10.2991/icaicte.2013.66.
  17. Chuang SC, Hwang FK, Tsai CC. Students’ perceptions of constructivist internet learning environments by a physics virtual laboratory: the gap between ideal and reality and gender differences. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008;11(2):150–156. DOI: 10.1089/cpb. 2007.0024.
  18. Miller W, King J, Doerfert D. Evaluating interaction in the distance education setting. (Abstract) 1996;40(3):22.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.