The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Evaluating the Performance of Dental Students with Different Levels of Clinical Experience in Learning ICDAS

Kalyan VC Pishipati, Lahari Telang, Jayashri T Nerali, Ajay Telang, Sabarinathan Jaganathan

Keywords : Caries detection, Dental students, ICDAS, Training

Citation Information : Pishipati KV, Telang L, Nerali JT, Telang A, Jaganathan S. Evaluating the Performance of Dental Students with Different Levels of Clinical Experience in Learning ICDAS. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (1):89-92.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3026

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 19-04-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the dental students’ performance in ICDAS (International Caries Detection and Assessment System) coding with different levels of clinical experience. Materials and methods: Dental students (n = 122) in their clinical years, year 3 (n = 37), year 4 (n = 44), and year 5 (n = 41) received training (two-hour introductory lecture on ICDAS, followed by a 90 min e-learning video, and practice sessions using extracted teeth and photographs) from a calibrated expert. After training, the students examined a prevalidated set of extracted teeth and assigned scores in two sessions. The intra- and inter-examiner agreement between students was analyzed using weighted kappa statistics and a focus group discussion was conducted for qualitative feedback. Results: The range of kappa values for intra-examiner agreement among the year 3, 4, and 5 students for ICDAS caries code (0.611–0.879, 0.633–0.848, and 0.645–1.000) and restoration code (0.615–0.942, 0.612–0.923, 0.653–1.000), respectively. The range of kappa values for inter-examiner agreement for year 3, 4, and 5 students with a trained expert for ICDAS caries code (0.526–0.713, 0.467–0.810, and 0.525–0.842) and restoration code (0.531–0.816, 0.682–0.842, and 0.645–0.928), respectively. Conclusion: The ICDAS system is a promising tool for caries detection and its implementation in the curriculum was perceived by dental students as an effective method. In general, there was moderate to substantial agreement for ICDAS caries and restoration code between students of different academic year groups and with a trained ICDAS expert. Clinical significance: ICDAS is a simple, logical, and evidence-based system for the detection and classification of caries. Introducing ICDAS to dental students enables them to detect caries in a reliable and reproducible manner irrespective of their past clinical experience and also significantly improves their caries detection skills.

PDF Share
  1. Pitts N. “ICDAS”—an international system for caries detection and assessment being developed to facilitate caries epidemiology, research and appropriate clinical management. Community Dent Health 2004;21(3):193–198.
  2. Oral Health Assessment and Review—Full Guidance. Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme. Pitts NB (Guidance Development Group Chair) and the SDCEP Guidance Development Group—May 2012.
  3. Pitts NB, Ekstrand KR. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and its International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS)—methods for staging of the caries process and enabling dentists to manage caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2013;41(1):e41–e52. DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12025.
  4. Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Hug I, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for occlusal caries detection. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2009;37(5):399–404. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00487.x.
  5. Khattak MI, Csikar J, Vinall K, et al. The views and experiences of general dental practitioners (GDP's) in West Yorkshire who used the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) in research. PLoS ONE 2019 Oct;14(10):e0223376. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223376.
  6. Braga MM, Oliveira LB, Bonini GA, et al. Feasibility of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II) in epidemiological surveys and comparability with standard World Health Organization criteria. Caries Res 2009;43(4):245–249. DOI: 10.1159/000217855.
  7. Honkala E, Runnel R, Honkala S, et al. Measuring dental caries in the mixed dentition by ICDAS. Int J Dent 2011;2011:150424. DOI: 10.1155/2011/150424.
  8. Braga MM, Mendes FM, Ekstrand KR. Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54(3):479–493. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.006.
  9. Kuhnisch J, Berger S, Goddon I, et al. Occlusal caries detection in permanent molars according to WHO basic methods, ICDAS II and laser fluorescence measurements. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008;36(6):475–484. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2008.00436.x.
  10. Diniz MB, Lima LM, Santos-Pinto L, et al. Influence of the ICDAS e-learning program for occlusal caries detection on dental students. J Dent Educ 2010;74(8):862–868.
  11. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20(1):37–46. DOI: 10.1177/001316446002000104.
  12. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med 2012;22(3):276–282.
  13. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, et al. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35(3):170–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x.
  14. Foley JI. Dental students consistency in applying the ICDAS system within paediatric dentistry. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2012;13(6):319–322. DOI: 10.1007/BF03320834.
  15. Zandona AG, Al-Shiha S, Eggertsson H, et al. Student versus faculty performance using a new visual criterion for the detection of caries on occlusal surfaces: an in vitro examination with histological validation. Oper Dent 2009;34(5):598–604. DOI: 10.2341/08-082-L.
  16. Al-Khalifa KS. Use of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System by Dental Students at the University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Dent Res 2016;7(1):38–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjdr.2015.03.001.
  17. Jablonski-Momeni A, Stachniss V, Ricketts DN, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 2008;42(2):79–87. DOI: 10.1159/000113160.
  18. Mitropoulus P, Rahiotis C, Stamatakis H, et al. Diagnostic performance of the visual caries classification system ICDAS II versus radiography and micro-computed tomography for proximal caries detection: an in vitro study. J Dent 2010;38(11):859–867.
  19. El-Housseiny AA, Jamjoum H. Evaluation of visual, explorer, and a laser device for detection of early occlusal caries. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2001;26(1):41–48. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.1.ch28322k5837j772.
  20. McLeod SA. Kolb—learning styles. Simply Psychology 2017 Oct 24.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.