Citation Information :
Howait M, Shaker M, Aljuhani H, AlMohnna M. External Cervical Resorption: A Case Report and Brief Review of the Literature, and Treatment Algorithms. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (3):298-303.
Aim: This report presents a case of external cervical resorption and illustrates the effects of a non-surgical approach in the amelioration of this condition and discusses the etiology, classifications, and treatment options.
Background: One of the most common root resorption forms is external cervical resorption, which initiates in the cervical area of the tooth and spreads out in the thickness of the dentin in an irregular way. This resorptive process may spread across the dentin leading to significant loss of tooth structure, with or without pulp involvement.
Case description: During a routine radiographic examination of a 25-year-old female patient, external cervical resorption in a maxillary right second premolar was discovered. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) confirmed the extension of the lesion into the pulp and the need for root canal treatment. The defect was sealed with bioceramic putty. One year CBCT follow-up demonstrated the cessation of the resorption site with no clinical symptoms.
Conclusion: CBCT examination and combining non-surgical root canal treatment with non-surgical repair using bioceramic putty was an effective treatment option.
Clinical significance: Treatment selection of external cervical resorption depends on many factors, including the location and severity of the resorptive defect and the remaining tooth structure. If the resorptive defect has extended to the pulp, the management involves root canal treatment and subsequent placement of a direct restoration to restore the resorptive lesion.
Patel S, Kanagasingam S, Pitt Ford T. External cervical resorption: a review. J Endod 2009;35(5):616–625. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.015.
Patel S, Ford TP. Is the resorption external or internal? Dent Update 2007;34(4):218–220, 222, 224–226, 229. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2007.34.4.218.
Patel J, Beddis HP. How to assess and manage external cervical resorption. Br Dent J 2019;227(8):695–701. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-019-0781-x.
Mavridou AM, Hauben E, Wevers M, et al. Understanding external cervical resorption in vital teeth. J Endod 2016;42(12):1737–1751. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.007.
Liang H, Burkes EJ, Frederiksen NL. Multiple idiopathic cervical root resorption: systematic review and report of four cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32(3):150–155. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/12925020.
Heithersay GS. Invasive cervical resorption: an analysis of potential predisposing factors. Quintessence Int 1999;30(2):83–95. Retrieved from http://www.quintpub.com/journals/qi/.
European Society of Endodontology developed by; Patel S, Lambrechts P, et al. European Society of Endodontology position statement: external cervical resorption. Int Endod J 2018;51(12):1323–1326. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13008.
Patel S, Foschi F, Mannocci F, et al. External cervical resorption: a three-dimensional classification. Int Endod J 2018;51(2):206–214. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12824.
Frank AL, Torabinejad M. Diagnosis and treatment of extracanal invasive resorption. J Endod 1998;24(7):500–504. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80056-3.
Heithersay GS. Treatment of invasive cervical resorption: an analysis of results using topical application of trichloracetic acid, curettage, and restoration. Quintessence Int 1999;30(2):96–110. Retrieved from http://www.quintpub.com/journals/qi/.
Patel S, Foschi F, Condon R, et al. External cervical resorption: part 2—management. Int Endod J 2018;51(11):1224–1238. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12946.
Heithersay GS. Management of tooth resorption. Aust Dent J 2007;52(1 Suppl):S105–S121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00519.x.
Patel S, Durak C, Ricucci D. Chapter 16, Root resorption. In: Berman L, Hargreaves K, eds. Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp, 11th edition. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016. pp. 660–683. ISBN: 9780323185875. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/books/cohens-pathways-of-the-pulp-expert-consult/berman/978-0-323-09635-5.
Kratchman S. Intentional replantation. Dent Clin North Am 1997;41(3):603–617. Retrieved from https://www.dental.theclinics.com.
Andersson L, Andreasen JO, Day P, et al. Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 2. Avulsion of permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2016;38(6):369–376. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2012.01125.x
Cho SY, Lee Y, Shin SJ, et al. Retention and healing outcomes after intentional replantation. J Endod 2016;42(6):909–915. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.006.
Choi YH, Bae JH, Kim YK, et al. Clinical outcome of intentional replantation with preoperative orthodontic extrusion: a retrospective study. Int Endod J 2014;47(12):1168–1176. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12268.
Torabinejad M, Dinsbach NA, Turman M, et al. Survival of intentionally replanted teeth and implant-supported single crowns: a systematic review. J Endod 2015;41(7):992–998. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.004.
Mavridou AM, Bergmans L, Barendregt D, et al. Descriptive analysis of factors associated with external cervical resorption. J Endod 2017;43(10):1602–1610. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.026.
Patel K, Mannocci F, Patel S. The assessment and management of external cervical resorption with periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical study. J Endod 2016;42(10):1435–1440. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.014.
Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, et al. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics—a review. Int Endod J 2015;48(1):3–15. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12270.
Bernardes RA, de Paulo RS, Pereira LO, et al. Comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiographs in diagnosis of lingual-simulated external root resorptions. Dent Traumatol 2012;28(4):268–272. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01113.x.
Ren H, Chen J, Deng F, et al. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for detecting simulated apical root resorption. Angle Orthod 2013;83(2):189–195. DOI: 10.2319/050512-372.1.
Vaz de Souza D, Schirru E, Mannocci F, et al. External cervical resorption: a comparison of the diagnostic efficacy using 2 different cone-beam computed tomographic units and periapical radiographs. J Endod 2017;43(1):121–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.008.
Heithersay GS. Invasive cervical resorption. Endodontic Topics. 2004;7(1):73–92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2004.00060.x.
Yamamura T. Differentiation of pulpal cells and inductive influences of various matrices with reference to pulpal wound healing. J Dent Res 1985;64 Spec No:530–540. DOI: 10.1177/002203458506400406.
Kuratate M, Yoshiba K, Shigetani Y, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of nestin, osteopontin, and proliferating cells in the reparative process of exposed dental pulp capped with mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2008;34(8):970–974. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.021.
Ford TR, Torabinejad M, Abedi HR, et al. Using mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulp-capping material. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127(10):1491–1494. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0058.
Faraco IM Jr., Holland R. Response of the pulp of dogs to capping with mineral trioxide aggregate or a calcium hydroxide cement. Dent Traumatol 2001;17(4):163–166. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2001.170405.x.
Gilberto Debelian MT. The use of premixed bioceramic materials in endodontics. Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia 2016;30(2):70–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.gien.2016.09.001.