The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Candida dubliniensis: The New Culprit on the Block Causing Denture Stomatitis? An In Vivo Study

Abhijit Patil, Navjot K Boparai, Swapnil B Shankargouda, Mallikarjun H Doddamani, Ankeet Vora, Twisha Dave

Keywords : Candida albicans, Candida dubliniensis, DNA extraction, PCR amplification

Citation Information : Patil A, Boparai NK, Shankargouda SB, Doddamani MH, Vora A, Dave T. Candida dubliniensis: The New Culprit on the Block Causing Denture Stomatitis? An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (5):517-521.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3099

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 09-07-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim: The present study aimed to carry out DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification to isolate the physiological and phenotypic traits of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis in denture wearer patients with and without denture-induced stomatitis. Materials and methods: A total sample size of 160 participants were divided into two equal groups (80 each), patients in the study group having 40 males and 40 females with Newton type II denture stomatitis, and in the control group, healthy 40 males and 40 females those who wear complete denture were selected. All the samples were collected from the hard palate with a sterile swab and inoculated on CHROM agar plate; samples that displayed dark green colored colonies were selected for DNA extraction. DNA isolation was done on agarose gel using electrophoresis. Biorad gene identification was used. Strands depicting the presence of DNA in particular samples were identified, and further standardization of the procedure was done. PCR amplification was done using Candida species-specific primer, preset to the hyphal wall of the protein 1 gene with the CRR forward and reverse primers, under strict standard conditions with reverse transcriptase technique. Results: Results showed that prevalence of C. albicans was more in females with denture stomatitis which was 67.50% than in males, i.e., 52.50%, and prevalence of C. dubliniensis was found in one female and in one male who were having denture stomatitis and it was not isolated from patients without denture stomatitis. Statistical analyses were performed using the Chi-square test. Conclusion: Denture stomatitis is the most common problem faced by long-term denture wearers, with C. albicans as one of the causative organisms. However, recent findings show an emerging pathogenic yeast species, C. dubliniensis, which was isolated from denture-induced stomatitis candidates in the present study, which is closely related to the C. albicans species. The identification of candidal strains causing denture stomatitis with DNA extraction and PCR amplification and its management by determination of its susceptibility to antifungals may improve the treatment outcome of the same. Clinical significance: Candidiasis is the most frequently seen mucocutaneous infection of the oral cavity especially in denture wearers. It is caused mainly by the genus Candida. C. dubliniensis is phenotypically similar but genotypically different from C. albicans. This affects the treatment outcome drastically as there is enough literature suggesting resistance to the common antifungal drugs. Hence, drugs like fungus-specific calcineurin inhibitors should also be considered in resistant patients. Therefore, DNA identification of Candida genus plays a major role in deciding the treatment outcome.

PDF Share
  1. Coronado-Castellote L, Jimenez-Soriano Y. Clinical and microbiological diagnosis of oral candidiasis. J Clin Exp Dent 2013;5(5):e279. DOI: 10.4317/jced.51242.
  2. Coleman DC, Sullivan DJ, Bennett DE, et al. Candidiasis: the emergence of a novel species, Candida dubliniensis. AIDS 1997;11(5):557–567. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199705000-00002.
  3. Willis AM, Coulter WA, Sullivan DJ, et al. Isolation of C. dubliniensis from insulin-using diabetes mellitus patients. J Oral Pathol Med 2000;29(2):86–90. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2000.290206.x.
  4. Mosca CO, Moragues MD, Brena S, et al. Isolation of Candida dubliniensis in an adolescent with prosthetic stomatitis. Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Surg 2005;10(1):25–31.
  5. Gasparoto TH, Dionisio TJ, de Oliveira CE, et al. Isolation of Candida dubliniensis from denture wearers. J Med Microbiol 2009;58(7): 959–962. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.008391-0.
  6. Moran GP, Sullivan DJ, Henman MC, et al. Antifungal drug susceptibilities of oral Candida dubliniensis isolates from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and non-HIV-infected subjects and generation of stable fluconazole-resistant derivatives in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41(3):617–623. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.41.3.617.
  7. Gilfillan GD, Sullivan DJ, Haynes K, et al. Candida dubliniensis: phylogeny and putative virulence factors. Microbiology 1998;144(4):829–838. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-144-4-829.
  8. Shin JH, Kee SJ, Shin MG, et al. Biofilm production by isolates of Candida species recovered from nonneutropenic patients: comparison of bloodstream isolates with isolates from other sources. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40(4):1244–1248. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.40.4.1244-1248.2002.
  9. Pfaller MA. Nosocomial candidiasis: emerging species, reservoirs, and modes of transmission. Clin Infect Dis 1996;22(Suppl. 2):S89–S94. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/22.supplement_2.s89.
  10. Willinger B, Hillowoth C, Selitsch B, et al. Performance of Candida ID, a new chromogenic medium for presumptive identification of Candida species, in comparison to CHROM agar Candida. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39(10):3793–3795. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3793-3795.2001.
  11. Romeo O, Racco C, Criseo G. Amplification of the hyphal wall protein 1 gene to distinguish Candida albicans from Candida dubliniensis. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44(7):2590–2592. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00125-06.
  12. Kakiuchi K, Yamauchi Y, Taoka M, et al. Proteomic analysis of in vivo 14-3-3 interactions in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry 2007;46(26):7781–7792. DOI: 10.1021/bi700501t.
  13. Mathaba LT, Davies G, Warmington JR. The genotypic relationship of Candida albicans strains isolated from the oral cavity of patients with denture stomatitis. J Med Microbiol 1995;42(5):372–379. DOI: 10.1099/00222615-42-5-372.
  14. Marcos-Arias C, Vicente JL, Sahand IH, et al. Isolation of Candida dubliniensis in denture stomatitis. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54(2):127–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.09.005.
  15. De Vasconcellos AA, Goncalves LM, Cury AA, et al. Candida-associated denture stomatitis: clinical relevant aspects. In: Oral Candidosis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2015. p. 53–57.
  16. Ramage G, Tomsett K, Wickes BL, et al. Denture stomatitis: a role for Candida biofilms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98(1):53–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.04.002.
  17. Coulter WA, Strawbridge JL, Clifford T. Denture induced changes in palatal plaque microflora. Microb Ecol Health Dis 1990;3(2):77–85. DOI: 10.3109/08910609009140121.
  18. Sumi Y, Kagami H, Ohtsuka Y, et al. High correlation between the bacterial species in denture plaque and pharyngeal microflora. Gerodontology 2003;20(2):84–87.
  19. Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of Candida albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different surface topography. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77(5):535–539. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70148-3.
  20. Koch C, Burgers R, Hahnel S. Candida albicans adherence and proliferation on the surface of denture base materials. Gerodontology 2013;30(4):309–313. DOI: 10.1111/ger.12056.
  21. Figueiral MH, Azul A, Pinto E, et al. Denture-related stomatitis: identification of aetiological and predisposing factors – a large cohort. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34(6):448–455. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1365-2842.2007.01709.x.
  22. Budtz-Jorgensen E. Etiology, pathogenesis, therapy, and prophylaxis of oral yeast infections. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48(1):61–69. DOI: 10.3109/00016359009012735.
  23. Coulthwaite L, Verran J. Potential pathogenic aspects of denture plaque. Br J Biomed Sci 2007;64(4):180–189. DOI: 10.1080/09674845.2007.11732784.
  24. Glass RT, Belobraydic KA. Dilemma of denture contamination. J Okla Dent Assoc 1990;81(2):30–33.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.