The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Prediction of Mandibular Growth Pattern Using Palatoscopy: A Retrospective Model Analysis

Swaroop Subramonia, Prasanna T Ramaiah, Suhas Setty, Mayank Khandelwal, Chethan K Dakshina, Cilpa Varghese

Keywords : Craniofacial growth pattern, Mandibular growth pattern, Mandibular rotation, Palatoscopy

Citation Information : Subramonia S, Ramaiah PT, Setty S, Khandelwal M, Dakshina CK, Varghese C. Prediction of Mandibular Growth Pattern Using Palatoscopy: A Retrospective Model Analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (3):264-267.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3060

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-03-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: To predict and correlate mandibular growth pattern using palatoscopy (average, horizontal, and vertical). Materials and methods: This retrospective study includes 120 archived maxillary casts. One key person and two examiners performed the study; the key person was responsible for coding and collecting casts and radiographs, as well as calibration of the examiners. The key person divided the samples into three craniofacial growth pattern groups (average, horizontal, and vertical) based on Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA), SN-GoGn, and facial axis angle and distributed them to the blinded examiners. Rugae were studied using a modified Thomas and Kotze classification system. After the analysis, the results were decoded and analyzed with the corresponding cephalometric radiographs. Results: Multinomial logistic regression was employed to predict the mandibular growth patterns with the following independent variables: Forwardly directed rugae, number of divergent rugae, predominant shape circular, predominant shape curved, primary rugae, predominant shape wavy, number of convergent rugae, and horizontally directed rugae. Conclusion: Palatal rugae patterns predict the growth pattern of the mandible. Clinical significance: Considering the significant parameters and their correlation with mandibular growth pattern, prediction of mandibular growth patterns can be done noninvasively.


PDF Share
  1. Rizwan M, Mascarenhas R, Hussain A. Reliability of the existing vertical dysplasia indicators in assessing a definitive growth pattern. Rev Latinoam Ortodon Odontop 2011;16:1–5.
  2. Asad S, Naeem S. Correlation between various vertical dysplasia assessment parameters. Pak Orthodont J 2009;1(1):28–33.
  3. Hauser G, Daponte A, Roberts MJ. Palatal rugae. J Anat 1989;165:237–249.
  4. Patil MS, Patil SB, Acharya AB. Palatine rugae and their significance in clinical dentistry: a review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139(11):1471–1478. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0072.
  5. Van der Linden FP. Changes in the position of posterior teeth in relation to ruga points. Am J Orthod 1978;74(2):142–161. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90081-7.
  6. Kallianpur S, Desai A, Kasetty S, et al. An anthropometric analysis of facial height, arch length, and palatal rugae in the Indian and Nepalese population. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3(1):33–37. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.85294.
  7. Thomas C, Kotze T. The palatal ruga pattern in six southern African human populations. Part I: a description of the populations and a method for its investigation. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1983;38:158–165.
  8. Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, et al. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J 1997;42(2):129–133. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1997.tb00110.x.
  9. Hirschfeld W, Moyers R. Prediction of craniofacial growth. The state of the art. Am J Orthod 1971;60(5):435–444. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90112-6.
  10. Nathani R, Diagavane P, Shrivastav S, et al. Evaluation of frontal sinus as a growth predictor in horizontal, vertical, and average growth pattern in children from 8 to 11 years: a cephalometric study. J Indian Orthod Soc 2016;50(2):101–105. DOI: 10.4103/0301-5742.179944.
  11. Ahmed M, Shaikh A, Fida M. Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern. Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21(4):41–49. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.041-049.oar.
  12. Aki T, Nanda R, Currier F, et al. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106(1):60–69. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70022-2.
  13. Rossouw PE, Lombard CJ, Harris AM. The frontal sinus and mandibular growth prediction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100(6):542–546. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70095-E.
  14. Leslie LR, Southard TE, Southard KA, et al. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation assessment of the Skieller, Björk, and Linde-Hansen method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114(6):659–667. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70198-2.
  15. Björk A. The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in children: method and application. Am J Phys Anthropol 1968;29(2):243–254. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330290217.
  16. Davidovitch M, Eleftheriadi I, Kostaki A, et al. The use of Bjork's indications of growth for evaluation of extremes of skeletal morphology. Eur J Orthod 2016;38(6):555–562. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv084.
  17. Ricketts R. Cephalometric synthesis. Am J Orthod 1960;46(9):647–673. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(60)90172-X.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.