The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Assessment of Effect of Implant Angulation and Implant Number on the Dimensional Accuracy of Definitive Casts

Gurpreet Kaur, Parvinder S Baweja, Ravinder S Saini, Ish Paul Singh, Tanvi Sharma, Simarpreet Singh

Citation Information : Kaur G, Baweja PS, Saini RS, Singh IP, Sharma T, Singh S. Assessment of Effect of Implant Angulation and Implant Number on the Dimensional Accuracy of Definitive Casts. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (4):394-399.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3053

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-03-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim: To analyze the impact of implant angulation and implant number on the dimensional accuracy of definitive casts. Materials and methods: Seven definitive casts with implant analogs placed in a triangular pattern were made from dental stone. The groups were as follows: group 1 (control group) - all implant analogs perpendicular to the plane of the cast; the center implant analog (implant 2) being at 90° to the plane of the cast in all groups and implant analogs number 1 and 3 arranged in 5°, 10°, or 15° divergence from or convergence to the center implant (implant number 2). Three open-tray impressions of definitive casts were made in each group. Impressions were poured in type IV dental stone. Coordinates in the three planes were measured at the implant analog top surface and the base of the cast using a fine tip measuring stylus. The data were aligned and the angular differences between implant analog vectors from definitive and duplicate casts were calculated in degrees. Results: The impact of implant number on the dimensional accuracy of definitive casts was significant whereas for implant angulation it was nonsignificant. The correlation of angulation and the number of the implant did not show an interpretable pattern. The precision of duplicate casts (compared to definitive casts) is not affected by the combined interaction of implant number and implant angulation. Conclusion: The close proximity of implant angulation toward a right-angled direction results in higher precision of implant. In the impression, there is direct picking from the impression copings which decreases the discrepancies in implant angulation on impression and master cast. The interaction of implant angulation and the number shows a noninterpretable pattern. Clinical significance: Dimensionally accurate implant impressions can be made by using an open tray technique for three implants angled up to 15°.

  1. Nicholson L. Transfer index of multiple angulated abutments in the restoration of an edentulous maxilla. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78(6):605–608. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70012-x.
  2. Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, et al. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14(2):218–225. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708- 8208.2009.00241.x.
  3. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent1983;50(3):399–410. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(83)80101-2.
  4. Jemt T, Rubenstein JE, Carlsson L, et al. Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75(3):314–325. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90491-6.
  5. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4(3):241–247.
  6. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49(6):843–848. DOI: 10.1016/0022- 3913(83)90361-x.
  7. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6(4):448–455.
  8. Windhorn RJ, Gunnell TR. A simple open-tray implant impression technique. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96(3):220–221. DOI: 10.1016/j. prosdent.2006.07.009.
  9. Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, et al. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(6):349–356. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60023-7.
  10. Kohavi D. Combined impression technique for a partial implantsupported fixed-detachable restoration. Quintessence Int 1997;28:177–181.
  11. Assif D, Marsha B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11(2):216–222.
  12. Phillips KM, Nicholls JI, Ma T, et al. The accuracy of three implant impression techniques: a three-dimensional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9(5):533–540.
  13. Barrett MG, de Rijk WG, Burgess JO. The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthodont 1993;2(2):75–82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1993.tb00387.x.
  14. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7(4):468–475.
  15. Hsu CC, Millstein PL, Stein RS. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(6):588–593. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90287-x.
  16. Humphries RM, Yaman P, Bloem TJ. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5(4):331–336.
  17. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, et al. An evaluation of impression techniques for mul tiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92(5):470–476. DOI: 10.1016/j. prosdent.2004.08.015.
  18. Caputi S, Varvara G. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99(4):274–281. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60061-X.
  19. Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, et al. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77(1):68–75. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70209-9.
  20. Inturregui JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, et al. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(5):503–509. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90160-p.
  21. Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(5):562–566. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70015-1.
  22. De La Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, et al. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: a comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(3):329–336. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128070.
  23. Assuncao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent 2004;13(4):358–366. DOI: 10.1097/
  24. Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(3):323–331. DOI: 10.1016/s0022- 3913(00)70136-3.
  25. Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23(1):39–47.
  26. Burns J, Palmer R, Howe L, Wilson R. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(3):250–255. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.38.
  27. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. St Louis: Mosby; 1999.
  28. Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11(5):620–625.
  29. Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of implantlevel impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(5):761–768.
  30. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int Oral Surg 1981;10(6):387–416. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.