The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Surgical Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Mandibular Protrusion with Multiple Impacted Ankylosed Teeth Treated with Alveolar Corticotomy

Toyoaki Takagi, So Shimizu

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3071

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-04-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim: To present a case of skeletal mandibular protrusion with multiple impacted ankylosed teeth, which were treated with conventional orthognathic surgery and alveolar corticotomy, respectively. Background: Tooth ankylosis is characterized by the fusion of a root surface with the surrounding alveolar bone. Various treatment modalities for tooth ankylosis have been developed and are used commonly in the clinic. Corticotomy is defined as the application of intentional surgical injury to the cortical bone to mobilize a tooth with the adjacent bone and soft tissues. The corticotomy technique has been improved in recent years to avoid possible risks such as periodontal damage, tooth devitalization, and osseous necrosis due to an inadequate blood supply. Case description: A female patient aged 16 years and 3 months was diagnosed with anterior crossbite and the impaction and ankylosis of multiple canines. After the confirmation of ankylosis, alveolar corticotomy was performed on the maxillary left and mandibular right canines. After 6 months of traction (patient age, 19 years and 7 months), both canines had extruded successfully. After the completion of preoperative treatment, bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy was performed to correct the anterior crossbite involving a skeletal mandibular protrusion. The amounts of mandibular setback on the right and left sides were approximately 7 and 5 mm, respectively. The total treatment period was 55 months. Acceptable occlusion with a balanced profile was maintained over a 5-year retention period, indicating the long-term stability and success of the treatment. Conclusion: Our results indicate that alveolar corticotomy should be considered to facilitate the treatment of multiple impacted ankylosed teeth. Clinical significance: This report proposes an efficacy of alveolar corticotomy for extrusion of impacted ankylosed teeth.

  1. Fernandez CCA, Pereira CVCA, Luiz RR, et al. Dental anomalies in different growth and skeletal malocclusion patterns. Angle Orthod 2018;88(2):195–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.01.010.
  2. Becker A, Chaushu S. Etiology of maxillary canine impaction: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148(4):557–567. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.013.
  3. Al Balbeesi HO, Al Kawari HM, Al Tamimi AS, et al. Association between canine impaction and skeletal pattern in the sagittal and vertical planes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2020;40(2):253–259. DOI: 10.11607/prd.4210.
  4. Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101(2):159–171. DOI: 10.1016/0889- 5406(92)70008-X.
  5. Becker A, Lustmann J, Shteyer A. Cleidocranial dysplasia: part 1—general principles of the orthodontic and surgical treatment modality. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111(1):28–33. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70298-1.
  6. Kuroda S, Yanagita T, Kyung HM, et al. Titanium screw anchorage for traction of many impacted teeth in a patient with cleidocranial dysplasia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(5):666–669. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.026.
  7. Tanaka E, Kawazoe A, Nakamura S, et al. An adolescent patient with multiple impacted teeth. Angle Orthod 2008;78(6):1110–1108. DOI: 10.2319/121007-581.1.
  8. Tanaka E, Watanabe M, Nagaoka K, et al. Orthodontic traction of an impacted maxillary central incisor. J Clin Orthod 2001;35(6):375–378. PMID: 11494940.
  9. Stewart JA, Heo G, Glover KE, et al. Factors that relate to treatment duration for patients palatally impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119(3):216–225. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.110989.
  10. Becker A, Chaushu S. Success rate and duration of orthodontic treatment for adult patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124(5):509–514. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00578-x.
  11. Tanaka E, Iwabe T, Watanabe M, et al. An adolescent case of anterior open bite with masticatory muscle dysfunction. Angle Orthod 2003;73(5):608–613. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0608:AACOAO>2.0.CO;2.
  12. Takagi T, Shimizu S, Tanaka E. Treatment of unilateral posterior open bite by an ankylosed mandibular first molar with alveolar corticotomy. J Clin Orthod 2020 [in press].
  13. Silvestrini Biavati A, Signori A, Castaldo A, et al. Incidence and distribution of deciduous molar ankylosis, a longitudinal study. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2011;12(3):175–178. PMID: 22077686.
  14. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Essentials of traumatic injuries to the teeth. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard; 1991. p. 103–131.
  15. Senisik NE, Kocer G, Ureyen Kaya B. Ankylosed maxillary incisor with severe root resorption treated with a single-tooth dento-osseous osteotomy, vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis, and miniimplant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;146(3):371–384. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.026.
  16. Kofod T, Würtz V, Melsen B. Treatment of an ankylosed central incisor by single tooth dentoosseous osteotomy and a simple distraction device. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127(1):72–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.020.
  17. Ohkubo K, Susami T, Mori Y, et al. Treatment of ankylosed maxillary central incisors by single tooth dentoosseous osteotomy and alveolar bone distraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111(5):561–567. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.06.026.
  18. Uzuner FD, Darendeliler N. Dentoalveolar surgery techniques combined with orthodontic treatment: a literature review. Eur J Dent 2013;7(2):257–265. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.110201.
  19. Patterson BM, Dalci O, Darendeliler MA, et al. Corticotomies and orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74(3):453–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.10.011.
  20. Wada K, Matsushita K, Shimazaki S, et al. An evaluation of a new case analysis of a lateral cephalometric roentgenogram. J Kanazawa Med Univ 1981;6:60–70.
  21. Hwang DH, Park KH, Kwon YD, et al. Treatment of Class II open bite complicated by an ankylosed maxillary central incisor. Angle Orthod 2011;81(4):726–735. DOI: 10.2319/102010-578.1.
  22. Hu J, Li J, Wang D, et al. Differences in mandibular distraction osteogenesis after corticotomy and osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31(2):185–189. DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0193.
  23. Baek SH, Kim K, Choi JY. Evaluation of treatment modality for skeletal Calss III malocclusion with labioversed upper incisors and/or protrusive maxilla: surgical movement and stability of rotational maxillary setback procedure. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20(6):2049–2054. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181be87ba.
  24. Chaushu S, Becker A, Chaushu G. Orthosurgical treatment with lingual orthodontics of an infraoccluded maxillary first molar in an adult. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125(3):379–387. DOI: 10.1016/j. ajodo.2003.05.003.
  25. Raghoebar GM, Boering G, Jansen HW, et al. Secondary retention of permanent molars: a histologic study. J Oral Pathol Med 1989;18(8):427–431. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1989.tb01338.x.
  26. Andreason JO. Injuries to developing teeth. In: Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, editors. Textbook and color altas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard; 1994. p. 457–494.
  27. Rokutanda S, Yamada S, Yanamoto S, et al. Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47(10):1316–1321. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.05.013.
  28. Kung AYH, Leung YY. Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47(2):152–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.09.004.
  29. Al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van't Hof MA. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115(3):300–304. DOI: 10.1016/s0889- 5406(99)70333-1.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.