The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Microleakage Comparative Evaluation of RMGIC and Alkasite with and without Adhesive System in Class V Cavity: An In Vitro Study

Dennis Dennis, Sondang Pintauli, Shinta Debora

Keywords : Adhesive, Alkasite, Class V restoration, Microleakage, RMGIC

Citation Information : Dennis D, Pintauli S, Debora S. Microleakage Comparative Evaluation of RMGIC and Alkasite with and without Adhesive System in Class V Cavity: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (7):735-738.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3130

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-09-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: This study aimed to compare microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and alkasite with and without adhesive system in class V cavity. Materials and methods: Thirty class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface. All prepared samples were randomly divided into three groups. Group I was restored with RMGIC, group II was restored with Cention N after the application of adhesive system, and group III was restored with alkasite. Samples were subjected to 200 thermocycles between temperature baths at 5°C and 55°C. Samples were stained with 2% methylene blue. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally, and the sections were then observed under stereomicroscope at a magnification of 20×. Results: Statistical analysis showed that there was less microleakage in Cention N using adhesive system in both occlusal margin and gingival margin. Conclusion: There were significant differences between RMGIC, alkasite with adhesive system, and alkasite without adhesive system in class V cavity. Least microleakage at the occlusal margin and gingival margin was seen with Cention N using adhesive system and highest microleakage at the RMGIC. Clinical significance: Cention N using the adhesive system affects the microleakage in the class V restoration. The study theorizes that the material restorations showed less microleakage in the occlusal margin than in the gingival margin.


PDF Share
  1. Suma B, Savitha S, Nandini S, et al. Management of class V lesions based on etiology. J Conserv Dent 2007;10(4):141–147. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.43038.
  2. Hempton TJ, Ovadia R, McManama JC, et al. Addressing cervical class V lesions. J Profession Excellence Dimens Dent Hyg 2010;8(3):48–51.
  3. Patil TN, Saraf PA, Penukonda R. Non-carious cervical lesions: an update. J Indian Dent Assoc2017;11(5):32–39.
  4. Perez CR. Alternative technique for class V resin composite restorations with minimum finishing/polishing procedures. Oper Dent 2010;35(3):375–379. DOI: 10.2341/09-310-TR.
  5. Kaur M, Khanna R, Malhotra S, et al. Stereomicroscopic evaluation of microleakage using cention n and conventional glass ionomer cement. Indian J Compr Dent Care 2018;8(2):1143–1145.
  6. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012. p. 184.
  7. Berzin DW, Abey MC, Wilkie CA, et al. Resin-modified glass-ionomer setting reaction competition. J Dent Res 2010;89(1):82–86. DOI: 10.1177/0022034509355919.
  8. Almuhaiza M. Glass ionomer cement in restorative dentistry. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;17(4):331–336. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1850.
  9. Meshram PV, Meshram VS. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around class v cavities restored with new alkasite material and two different flowable composite resin. Int J Curr Res 2018;10(4): 67780–67782. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_767_17.
  10. Mann JS, Sharma S, Maurya S, et al. Cention n: a review. Int J Curr Res 2018;10(5).
  11. Mazumsdar P, Das A, Das UK. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different direct restorative materials (silver amalgam, gic, cention n) in class II restorations using stereomicroscope. Indian J Dent Res 2019;30(2):277–281. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_481_17.
  12. Anusavice, Shen, Rawls. Philip's science of dental materials. 12th ed. Elsevier; 2012. p. 325–327.
  13. Garg N, Garg A. Textbook of operative dentistry. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2010. p. 402–404.
  14. Meshram P, Meshram V, Palve D, et al. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around class v cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin. Indian J Dent Res 2019;30(3):403–407. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_767_17.
  15. Scientific documentation: cention n ivoclarvivadent AG research & development scientific service. 2016.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.