The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of Anticaries Efficacy of Various Fluoride Varnishes on Artificial Enamel Lesion: An In Vitro Study

BS Kavya Rani, Pavithra K Ramanna, Shilpa Mailankote, Arun K Joy, Archana A Thomas, Mathews Baby

Keywords : Demineralization, Enamel lesion, Fluoride varnish, Scanning electron microscope

Citation Information : Rani BK, Ramanna PK, Mailankote S, Joy AK, Thomas AA, Baby M. Evaluation of Anticaries Efficacy of Various Fluoride Varnishes on Artificial Enamel Lesion: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (7):774-777.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3147

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-09-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: Aim of the current study was to assess the anticariogenic effectiveness of different fluoride varnishes on artificially induced enamel lesions employing scanning electron microscope. Materials and methods: Eighty healthy, normal premolars without dental caries that were extracted in course of orthodontic therapy with all the surfaces intact were included in this study. A window, 4 × 4 mm, was made discernible on the buccal surface of each sample tooth. A demineralizing solution at 37°C was used to immerse the teeth for 48 hours to induce artificial lesions on the surface of the enamel. Following preparation of the artificial enamel lesions, the 80 premolar teeth were allocated into the four groups (20 each) depending on the fluoride varnish system used as Group I: control, Group II: Duraphat varnish, Group III: MI Varnish, and Group IV: Clinpro White Varnish. The anticariogenic effectiveness of different fluoride varnishes was evaluated employing a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: The MI Varnish (fluoride varnish) group exhibited slightly greater (127.20 ± 0.14) mean demineralized lesions, pursued by Clinpro White Varnish use (126.88 ± 0.09), the control group (126.36 ± 0.10) and the Duraphat varnish (124.14 ± 0.08) in that order. Greater mean areas of remineralization were found with use of MI Varnish (92.40 ± 0.09), pursued by the Duraphat varnish use (106.68 ± 0.12), use of Clinpro White Varnish (112.36 ± 0.08), and then the control group (123.08 ± 0.18) in that order. Statistically significant differences were noted between the experimental groups employing the various fluoride varnishes (p <0.001). Conclusion: The current research concluded that the MI Varnish group presented a superior protective potential in comparison with Duraphat varnish and Clinpro White Varnish groups. Clinical significance: Mineral exchanges among teeth and saliva render incipient enamel lesions reversible. A 5% sodium fluoride varnish is the MI Varnish that is composed of casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) to provide an excellent fluoride varnish that makes available additional bioavailable fluoride, calcium, and phosphate. Therefore, it may be fruitfully utilized in remineralization of initial carious lesions. CPP-ACP may be employed in clinical practice for drawing back or ceasing initial carious lesions.


PDF Share
  1. Baik A, Alamoudi N, El-Housseiny A, et al. Fluoride varnishes for preventing occlusal dental caries: a review. Dent J (Basel) 2021;9(6):64. DOI: 10.3390/dj9060064.
  2. Gao SS, Zhang S, Mei ML, et al. Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2016;16(12):1–9. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-016-0171-6.
  3. Hazelrigg CO, Dean JA, Fontana M. Fluoride varnish concentration gradient and its effect on enamel demineralization. Pediatr Dent 2003;25(2):119–126. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12723836/
  4. Lippert F, Hara AT, Martinez-Mier EA, et al. Laboratory investigations into the potential anticaries efficacy of fluoride varnishes. Pediatr Dent 2014;36(4):291–295. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25197993/
  5. Larsen MJ, Pearce EIF. Saturation of human saliva with respect to calcium salts. Arch Oral Biolog 2003;48(4):317–322. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(03)00007-4.
  6. Nozari A, Ajami S, Rafiei A, et al. Impact of nano hydroxyapatite, nano silver fluoride and sodium fluoride varnish on primary teeth enamel remineralization: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(9):ZC97–ZC100. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/30108.10694.
  7. Wong L, Sissions C. A comparison of human dental plaque microcosm biofilms grown in an undefined medium and a chemically defined artificial saliva. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46(6):477–486. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00016-4.
  8. Miller EK, Vann WF Jr. The use of fluoride varnish in children: A critical review with treatment recommendations. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;32(4):259–264. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.32.4.a7516vj8762687v5.
  9. Jeevarathan J, Deepti A, Muthu MS, et al. Effect of fluoride varnish on Streptococcus mutans counts in plaque of caries-free children using Dentocult SM strip mutans test: a randomized controlled triple blind study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007;25(4):157–163. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.37010.
  10. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Helgeland K. Fluoride retention in sound and demineralized enamel in vivo after treatment with a fluoride varnish (Duraphat). Scand J Dent Res 1984;92(3):190–197. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00878.x.
  11. Patil N, Choudhari S, Kulkarni S, et al. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of three agents on artificially demineralized human enamel: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2013;16(2):116–120. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.108185.
  12. Schemehorn BR, Wood GD, McHale W, et al. Comparison of fluoride uptake into tooth enamel from two fluoride varnishes containing different calcium phosphate sources. J Clin Dent 2011;22(2):51–54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21702326/
  13. Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Flaitz C. Biological factors in dental caries: role of remineralization and fluoride in the dynamic process of demineralization and remineralization (part 3). J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004;28(3):203–214. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.28.3.w0610427l746j34n.
  14. Pithon MM, Dos Santos MJ, Andrade CS, et al. Effectiveness of varnish with CPP-ACP in prevention of caries lesions around orthodontic brackets: an OCT evaluation. Eur J Orthod 2015;37(2):177–182. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cju031.
  15. Cochrane NJ, Shen P, Yuan Y, et al. Ion release from calcium and fluoride containing dental varnishes. Aust Dent J 2014;59(1):100–105. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12144.
  16. Shen P, Bagheri R, Walker GD, et al. Effect of calcium phosphate addition to fluoride containing dental varnishes on enamel demineralization. Aust Dent J 2016;61(3):357–365. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12385.
  17. Attin T, Hartmann O, Hilgers RD, et al. Fluoride retention of incipient enamel lesions after treatment with a calcium fluoride varnish in vivo. Arch Oral Biol 1995;40(3):169–174. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(95)98804-8.
  18. Delbem AC, Brighenti FL, Oliveira FA, et al. In vitro assessment of an experimental coat applied over fluoride varnishes. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17(4):280–283. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000400003.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.