The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Clinical and Radiographical Measurements of Supraeruption and Occlusal Interferences in Unopposed Posterior Teeth

Amit Porwal, Mohammed A Qahhar, Feras A Al Qatarneh, Seham A Areeshi, Mohammad BF Aldossary

Keywords : Occlusal interferences, Overeruption, Panoramic radiograph, Study casts, Supraeruption

Citation Information : Porwal A, Qahhar MA, Al Qatarneh FA, Areeshi SA, Aldossary MB. Clinical and Radiographical Measurements of Supraeruption and Occlusal Interferences in Unopposed Posterior Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (7):784-792.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3143

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-09-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aims and objectives: This study compared the supraeruption of teeth for study casts (SCs) and panoramic radiographs (PRs) and its relation to tooth type, arch, facial sides, presence of occlusal interferences, and type of tooth movements. Materials and methods: A total of 65 patients with their SCs and PRs were recruited. Supraerupted tooth type, arches, sides involved, and the presence of occlusal interferences were recorded. The SCs for supraerupted teeth were photographed, and supraeruption from PRs was recorded from the patients’ files. The values were transferred to a software program and assessed. Results: The highest frequency was observed among the younger-age group and molars in both arches. Working side (WS) and retruded cuspal position (RCP) interferences were recorded the highest. Supraeruption values of 0.7–1.2 mm accounted for 47.5% (38) of the total. Tilting and tipping of teeth were the highest, followed by buccolingual displacement. Kappa tests showed good intraexaminer reliability and Bland–Altman plot showed 95% confidence interval band. Conclusions: No significant differences were observed in the supraeruption values between the type of tooth among different subgroups of SCs and PRs. Significant differences were recorded between the types and sites of teeth, with a higher ratio observed in molar teeth, mandibular arch, and young age group. RCP and WS were the most recorded occlusal interferences and buccolingual displacement, and tilting and tipping were the most noticeable occlusal tooth movements. Clinical significance: Diagnosis and measurements of supraeruption are essential, useful, and significant steps before treatments for replacement of missing tooth/teeth as well as corrections of occlusal interferences during different mandibular movements.

HTML PDF Share
  1. Craddock HL, Youngson CC. A study of the incidence of overeruption and occlusal interferences in unopposed posterior teeth. Br Dent J 2004;196(6):341–348; discussion 37. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811082.
  2. Al Ahmari NM, Aldhalail MA, Abidi NH, et al. Techniques for management of supraerupted teeth prior to prosthetic treatment: updated review. Biosci Biotechnol Res Commun 2020;13(1):261–273. DOI: 10.21786/bbrc/13.1/43.
  3. Gupta S, Pratibha P, Bhat K, et al. Non-replaced mandibular first molars and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Nepal J Med Sci 2014;3(1):57–62. DOI: 10.3126/njms.v3i1.10360.
  4. Craddock HL. Consequences of tooth loss: 2. Dentist considerations--restorative problems and implications. Dent Update 2010;37(1):28–32. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2010.37.1.28.
  5. Craddock HL, Youngson CC, Manogue M, et al. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 1: a study of clinical parameters associated with the extent and type of supraeruption in unopposed posterior teeth. J Prosthodont 2007;16(6):485–494. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00212.x.
  6. Mahoorkar S, Puranik SN, Moldi A, et al. Management of supra-erupted posterior teeth. Int J Dent Clin 2010;2(3).
  7. Basutkar N, Wali O, Adbul QadeerAhmad S, et al. Management of severely supra-erupted teeth with endocrown: case report. Acta Sci Dent Sci 2018;2(9).
  8. Prakash P, Nishanth K, Jasani N, et al. Intrusion of overerupted molars using miniscrews and TMA spring: a case report. IJSS 2014;1(1):4.
  9. Salazar G, Serrano AF, Mazzey GO. Intrusion of an overerupted maxillary molar with orthodontic mini implants for implant restorative purposes. J Int Oral Health 2018;10(1):44. DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_236_17.
  10. Patil SA, Kulkarni S, Thakur S, et al. Crown lengthening procedure following intentional endodontic therapy for correction of supra-erupted posterior teeth: case series with long-term follow-up. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2016;20(1):103. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.175176.
  11. Tiago CM, Previdente L, Nouer PRA. Molar intrusion with orthodontic mini-implants. RGO—Rev Gaúch Odontol 2016;64(3):327–332. DOI: 10.1590/1981-8637201600030000133274.
  12. Baeg S, On S, Lee J, et al. Posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy for management of insufficient intermaxillary vertical space and intermolar width discrepancy: a case report. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;38(1):28. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-016-0074-0.
  13. Djemal S, Bavisha K, Gilmour G. Management of a supra-erupted premolar: a case report. Dent Update 2004;31(4):220–222. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2004.31.4.220.
  14. Marcus SE, Drury TF, Brown LJ, et al. Tooth retention and tooth loss in the permanent dentition of adults: United States, 1988–1991. J Dent Res 1996;75 Spec No:684-95. DOI: 10.1177/002203459607502S08.
  15. Newman M, Takei H, Klokkevold P, et al. Newman and Carranza's clinical periodontology. Saunders; 2018.
  16. Compagnon D, Woda A. Supraeruption of the unopposed maxillary first molar. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66(1):29–34. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90347-y.
  17. Craddock HL, Youngson CC, Manogue M, et al. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 2. Clinical parameters associated with movement of teeth adjacent to the site of posterior tooth loss. J Prosthodont 2007;16(6):495–501. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00223.x.
  18. Craddock HL. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 3. A study of clinical parameters associated with the presence of occlusal interferences following posterior tooth loss. J Prosthodont 2008;17(1):25–30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00239.x.
  19. Faggion CM, Jr., Giannakopoulos NN, Listl S. How strong is the evidence for the need to restore posterior bounded edentulous spaces in adults? Grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. J Dent 2011;39(2):108–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.11.002.
  20. Kiliaridis S, Lyka I, Friede H, et al. Vertical position, rotation, and tipping of molars without antagonists. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13(6):480–486.
  21. McCaul LK, Jenkins WM, Kay EJ. The reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Scotland: a 15-year follow-up study. Br Dent J 2001;190(12):658–662. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801068.
  22. Gossadi YI, Nahari H, Kinani H, et al. Reasons for permanent teeth extraction in Jizan region of Saudi Arabia. IOSR-JDMS 2015;14(1):86–89. DOI: 10.9790/0853-14178689.
  23. Meshni AA, Al Moaleem MM, Mattoo KA, et al. Radiographic evaluation of post-core restorations fabricated by dental students at Jazan University. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(1):66–72. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2213.
  24. Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms NE, GPT-9. The Academy of Prosthodontics Foundation. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117(5S):e1–e105. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001.
  25. Kim YK, Ahn KJ, Yun PY, et al. The clinical prognosis of implants that are placed against super-erupted opposing dentition. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;42(3):139–143. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.3.139.
  26. De Boever JA, Carlsson GE, Klineberg IJ. Need for occlusal therapy and prosthodontic treatment in the management of temporomandibular disorders. Part II: Tooth loss and prosthodontic treatment. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27(8):647–659. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00623.x.
  27. Matsuda K, Miyashita Y, Ikebe K, et al. Overeruption of teeth opposing removable partial dentures: a preliminary study. Int J Prosthodont 2014;27(5):475–476. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4006.
  28. Livas C, Halazonetis DJ, Booij JW, et al. Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases? Prog Orthod 2016;17(1):6. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-016-0119-z.
  29. Noman NA, Aladimi AA, Alkadasi BA, et al. Social habits and other risk factors that cause tooth loss: an associative study conducted in Taiz Governorate, Yemen. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(4):429.
  30. Al Moaleem M. Patterns of partial edentulism and its relation to khat chewing in Jazan population–a survey study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(3):ZC55. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23604.9577.
  31. Craddock HL, Youngson CC. Eruptive tooth movement--the current state of knowledge. Br Dent J 2004;197(7):385–391. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811712.
  32. Proffit WR. Equilibrium theory revisited: factors influencing position of the teeth. Angle Orthod 1978;48(3):175–186. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1978)048<0175:ETRFIP>2.0.CO;2.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.