The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 10 ( October, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Esthetic Evaluation of Maxillary Anterior Immediate Implant with Provisionalization with or without Bone Grafting

Neha Bhutani, Ghousia Fatima, Neha Rampure, Roopali Tapashetti, Sandeep S Prabhu, Fatru Rahman

Keywords : Esthetic zone, Immediate implant, Provisionalization

Citation Information : Bhutani N, Fatima G, Rampure N, Tapashetti R, Prabhu SS, Rahman F. Esthetic Evaluation of Maxillary Anterior Immediate Implant with Provisionalization with or without Bone Grafting. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (10):1105-1112.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3158

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 07-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim: Immediate implant in the esthetic zone is a treatment of choice. However, much research regarding immediate implant provisionalization lacked in the literature. Hence, our study was conducted with an aim to assess the changes in the soft tissue, hard tissue, and esthetic outcomes following immediate implants with provisionalization with or without bone grafting. Materials and methods: Twenty patients with a mean age between 18 and 55 years referred to the department of periodontology, for immediate implant placement in maxillary anterior region were included in the study. Patients were enrolled into two groups. Group I (test group) included patients with immediate implant placement with provisionalization with bone grafting. Group II (control group) included patients with immediate implant placement with provisionalization without bone grafting. Cement-retained provisional restoration was fitted over temporary abutment for 6 months of healing period. After 6 months of implant placement, definite crown was delivered. Results: The results of our study showed the least resorption of buccal cortical plate and good amount of bone gain in both the groups in terms of horizontal alveolar dimensional changes. The mean amount of horizontal alveolar gain in group I was 1.12 mm at 2 mm, 1.08 mm at 4 mm, and 0.85 mm at 6 mm; in group II, it was 0.97 mm at 2 mm, 1.4 mm at 4 mm, and 0.93 mm at 6 mm. Conclusion: This study showed a significantly better outcome in both the groups in terms of all the parameters when compared from baseline but the mean differences between the two groups were not very significant. The study concluded that immediate implant with provisionalization with or without bone grafting has maintained stability of soft tissues as well as hard tissues and has also given better esthetic outcomes. Clinical significance: The findings of this study proved that immediate implant placement with provisionalization with bone grafting is a predictable treatment modality that maintains the three-dimensional stability of alveolar bone and integrity of soft tissue and gives acceptable esthetics. Hence, this technique promises to fulfill both functional and esthetic concerns of the patient.

  1. Pathak AK, Goel K. Periodontal parameters around implants and natural tooth. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2016;7(1):52–55. DOI: 10.4103/0975-5950.196130.
  2. Joshi V, Gupta S. Immediate implant placement in anterior esthetic region and assesment using cone beam computed tomographic scan technology. J Int Oral Health 2015;7(2):99–102. PMID: 26668494.
  3. Singh A, Gupta A, Yadav A, et al. Immediate placement of implant in fresh extraction socket with early loading. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3(6):219–222. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.101099.
  4. Evans CDJ, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Impl Res 2008;19(1):73–80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01413.x.
  5. Mombelli A, Lang NP. Clinical parameter for the evaluation of dental impants. Periodontol 2000 1994;4:81–86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00008.x.
  6. Testori T, Bianchi F, Fabbro MD, et al. Implant esthetic score for evaluating the outcome: immediate loading in the esthetic zone. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;12(2):123–130. PMID: 15918307.
  7. Barndt P, Zhang H, Liu F. Immediate loading: from biology to biomechanics. Report of the committee on research in fixed prosthodontics of the American Academy of fixed prosthodontics. J Prostho Dent 2015;112(2):96–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.08.011.
  8. Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstr JL, et al. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32(6):645–652. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x.
  9. Curtis M, Thomas GW. Minimum criteria for immediate provisionalization of single-tooth dental implants in extraction sites: a 1-year retrospective study of 100 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69(2):491–497. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.024.
  10. Allister MC. The rationale for the vented-crown technique and its application in today's dental practice. Oper Dent 2008;33(2):116–120. DOI: 10.2341/08-SA1.
  11. Esposito M, Gabriella M, Pietro F. Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2010;3(3):189–205. PMID: 20847990.
  12. Chen H, Lin G. Alteration in bone quality after socket preservation with graft material a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28(3):710–720. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2913.
  13. Kim YK, Yun PY, Lim SG, et al. Clinical evaluations of OSTEON as a new alloplastic material in sinus bone grafting and its effect on bone healing. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 2008;86(1):270–277. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31015.
  14. Erbe EM, Marx JG, Clineff TD, et al. Potential of an ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate synthetic cancellous bone void filler and bone marrow aspirate composite graft. Eur Spine J 2001;2(Suppl. 2):141–146. DOI: 10.1007/s005860100287.
  15. Chen ST, Wilson TG. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(19):12–25. PMID: 15635942.
  16. Kois JC. Predictable esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22(3):199–206.
  17. De Rouck T, Collys K, Cosyn J. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: a 1-year case cohort study on hard and soft tissue response. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(7):649–657. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01235.x.
  18. De Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, et al. Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Impl Res 2009;7(4):566–570. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01674.x.
  19. Bauman GR, Mills M, Rapley JW, et al. Clinical parameters of evaluation during implant maintenance. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1992;7(4): 220–227. PMID: 139883919.
  20. Buser D, Weber HP. Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants: 3-year results of a longitudinal study with Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6(4):L405–L412. PMID: 1820309.
  21. Ricci G. Crestal bone resorption 5 years after implant loading: clinical and radiologic results with a 2-stage implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(4):597–602. PMID: 15346759.
  22. Cooper M, Lyndon F. Immediate provisionalization of dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets: a 5-year prospective evaluation. Int J Oral Max Impl 2014;(3):709–717. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3617.
  23. Rossi F. A Cone beam tomographic evaluation of hard tissue alterations at immediate implants: a clinical prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33(6):815–823. DOI: 10.11607/prd.1442.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.