The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 10 ( October, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Retreatability of Bioceramic Sealer Using One Curve Rotary File Assessed by Microcomputed Tomography

Dina G Mufti, Saad A Al-Nazhan

Keywords : AH Plus sealer, Bioceramic sealer, Mandibular molar, Microcomputed tomography, Root canal retreatment

Citation Information : Mufti DG, Al-Nazhan SA. Retreatability of Bioceramic Sealer Using One Curve Rotary File Assessed by Microcomputed Tomography. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (10):1175-1183.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3214

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 07-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim and objective: This article aims to evaluate the residual filling materials after retreatment of bioceramic sealer used in the obturation technique of mandibular molars with different root curvatures using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Materials and methods: A total of 106 canals of mandibular molar teeth with closed apex, no fracture, calcification, or previously root canals treated were selected. Each tooth was mounted in acrylic resin blocks, and canals were instrumented with 06 One Curve rotary file and filled with gutta-percha and EndoSequence bioceramic (group A) or AH Plus sealer (group B) then subdivided into three groups (each) based on the degree of root curvature; mild (≤15°), moderate (16–30°), or severe (≥31°). Retreatment was done with the same rotary file. Samples were scanned before and after retreatment, and the volume of the residual materials was calculated. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: The micro-CT scans show remaining filling in all canal levels of the two groups after retreatment. The mean values of all canals in bioceramic as well as AH Plus samples were significantly higher at coronal level (p < 0.001). In addition, the mean differences of distolingual canal after retreatment were not significantly different between the three levels in bioceramic group (p = 0.051). In regard to the AH Plus group, the mean values of mesiolingual canal after retreatment were statistically significant higher at coronal level (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Micro-CT tool provides a clear 3D visualization. Remnants of Bioceramic and AH Plus sealers were detected in different canal curvatures. The use of One Curve rotary file did not improve the removal of the filling materials. Clinical significance: It is difficult to achieved complete removal of bioceramic filling material from the root canal system using rotary file.

  1. Lin LM, Skribner JE, Gaengler P. Factors associated with endodontic treatment failures. J Endod 1992;18(12):625–627. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81335-X.
  2. Pak JG, Fayazi S, White SN. Prevalence of periapical radiolucency and root canal treatment: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies. J Endod 2012;38(9):1170–1176. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.023.
  3. De Moor RJ, Hommez GM, De Boever JG, et al. Periapical health related to the quality of root canal treatment in a Belgian population. Int Endod J 2000;33(2):113–120. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00295.x.
  4. Nair PN. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004;15(6):348–381. DOI: 10.1177/154411130401500604.
  5. Grischke J, Müller-Heine A, Hülsmann M. The effect of four different irrigation systems in the removal of a root canal sealer. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18(7):1845–1851. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1161-6.
  6. Salehrabi R, Rotstein I. Endodontic treatment outcomes in a large patient population in the USA: an epidemiological study. J Endod 2004;30(12):846–850. DOI: 10.1097/
  7. Khayat A, Lee SJ, Torabinejad M. Human saliva penetration of coronally unsealed obturated root canals. J Endod 1993;19(9): 458–461. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80533-9.
  8. Candeiro GTM, Moura-Netto C, D'Almeida-Couto RS, et al. Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and antibacterial effectiveness of a bioceramic endodontic sealer. Int Endod J 2016;49(9):858–864. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12523.
  9. Malhotra S, Hegde M, Shetty C. Bioceramic technology in endodontics. Br J Med Almeida Res 2014;4(12):2446–2454. DOI: 10.9734/BJMMR/2014/7143.
  10. Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B. Assessment of a new root canal sealer's apical sealing ability. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(6):e79–e82. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.024.
  11. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32(2):271–275. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1.
  12. de Siqueira Zuolo A, Zuolo ML, da Silveira Bueno CE, et al. Evaluation of the Efficacy of TRUShape and Reciproc File systems in the removal of root filling material: an ex vivo micro-Computed tomographic study. J Endod 2016;42(2):315–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.005.
  13. Oltra E, Cox TC, LaCourse MR, et al. Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison. Restor Dent Endod 2017;42(1):19–26. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.19.
  14. De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, et al. XP-endo Finisher R instrument optimizes the removal of root filling remnants in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J 2019;52(6):899–907. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13077.
  15. Romeiro K, de Almeida A, Cassimiro M, et al. Reciproc and Reciproc blue in the removal of bioceramic and resin-based sealers in retreatment procedures. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24(1):405–416. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02956-3.
  16. Crozeta BM, Lopes FC, Menezes Silva R, et al. Retreatability of BC sealer and AH plus root canal sealers using new supplementary instrumentation protocol during non-surgical endodontic retreatment. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25(3):891–899. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03376-4.
  17. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J 2008;41(12):1026–1046. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01484.x.
  18. Hülsmann M, Drebenstedt S, Holscher C. Shaping and filling root canals during root canal retreatment. EndodTopics 2008;19(2): 74–124. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2011.00264.x.
  19. Sen BH, Safavi KE, Spångberg LS. Antifungal effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in root canals. J Endod 1999;25(4): 235–238. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80149-6.
  20. Tufenkci P, Orhan K, Celikten B, et al. Micro-computed tomographic assessment of the shaping ability of the One Curve, One Shape, and ProTaper Next nickel-titanium rotary systems. Restor Dent Endod 2020;45(3):e30. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e30.
  21. Kuzekanani M. Nickel-Titanium rotary instruments: development of the single-file systems. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2018;8(5): 386–390. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_225_18.
  22. Han L, Okiji T. Bioactivity evaluation of three calcium silicate-based endodontic materials. Int Endod J 2013;46(9):808–814. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12062.
  23. Hess D, Solomon E, Spears R, et al. Retreatability of a bioceramic root canal sealing material. J Endod 2011;37(11):1547–1549. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.016.
  24. Ersev H, Yilmaz B, Dinçol ME, et al. The efficacy of ProTaper universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2012;45(8):756–762. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02032.x.
  25. Ozkocak I, Sonat B. Evaluation of effects on the adhesion of various root canal sealers after Er:YAG laser and irrigants are used on the dentin surface. J Endod 2015;41(8):1331–1336. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.004.
  26. Silva EJNL, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, et al. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and XP-endo Finisher R in removing root filling remnants: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J 2018;51(1):86–91. DOI: 10.1111/iej. 12788.
  27. Machado AG, Guilherme BPS, Provenzano JC, et al. Effects of preparation with the Self-Adjusting File, TRUShape and XP-endo Shaper systems, and a supplementary step with XP-endo Finisher R on filling material removal during retreatment of mandibular molar canals. Int Endod J 2019;52(5):709–715. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13039.
  28. Al-Dahman Y, Al-Omari M. Retreatability of bioceramic and GuttaFlow bioseal rootcanal sealers using ProTaper universal system retreatment files: an ex vivo study. Saudi Endod J 2021;11(1): 42–48. DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_173_19.
  29. Rödig T, Reicherts P, Konietschke F, et al. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments for retreatment of curved root canals assessed by micro-CT. Int Endod J 2014;47(10):942–948. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12239.
  30. Unal GC, Kaya BU, Taç AG, et al. A comparison of the efficacy of conventional and new retreatment instruments to remove gutta-percha in curved root canals: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2009;42(4):344–350. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01518.x.
  31. Simsek N, Keles A, Ahmetoglu F, et al. Comparison of different retreatment techniques and root canal sealers: a scanning electron microscopic study. Braz Oral Res 2014;28:S1806-83242014000100221. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0006.
  32. Keleş A, Arslan H, Kamalak A, et al. Removal of filling materials from oval-shaped canals using laser irradiation: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 2015;41(2):219–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.026.
  33. Schirrmeister JF, Meyer KM, Hermanns P, et al. Effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing a new synthetic polymer-based root canal obturation material (Epiphany) during retreatment. Int Endod J 2006;39(2):150–156. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01066.x.
  34. Kfir A, Tsesis I, Yakirevich E, et al. The efficacy of five techniques for removing root filling material: microscopic versus radiographic evaluation. Int Endod J 2012;45(1):35–41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01944.x.
  35. Horvath SD, Altenburger MJ, Naumann M, et al. Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 2009;42(11): 1032–1038. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01616.x.
  36. Rödig T, Wagner J, Wiegand A, et al. Efficacy of the ProTaper retreatment system in removing Thermafil, GuttaCore or vertically compacted gutta-percha from curved root canals assessed by micro-CT. Int Endod J 2018;51(7):808–815. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12893.
  37. Gu LS, Ling JQ, Wei X, et al. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals.Int Endod J 2008;41(4):288–295. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01350.x.
  38. Barletta FB, de Sousa Reis M, Wagner M, et al. Computed tomography assessment of three techniques for removal of filling material.Aust Endod J 2008;34(3):101–105. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00088.x.
  39. Zuolo AS, Mello JE Jr, Cunha RS, et al. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 2013;46(10):947–953. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12085.
  40. Zaslansky P, Fratzl P, Rack A, et al. Identification of root filling interfaces by microscopy and tomography methods. Int Endod J 2011;44(5):395–401. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01830.x.
  41. Capar ID, Arslan H, Ertas H, et al. Effectiveness of ProTaper universal retreatment instruments used with rotary or reciprocating adaptive motion in the removal of root canal filling material. Int Endod J 2015;48(1):79–83. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12279.
  42. Uzunoglu E, Yilmaz Z, Sungur DD, et al. Retreatability of root canals obturated using Gutta-Percha with bioceramic, MTA and resin-based sealers. Iran Endod J 2015;10(2):93–98. PMID: 25834591; PMCID: PMC4372781.
  43. Rödig T, Hausdörfer T, Konietschke F, et al. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals-a micro-computed tomography study. Int Endod J 2012;45(6):580–589. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02014.x.
  44. Huang Y, Celikten B, de Faria Vasconcelos K, et al. Micro-CT and nano-CT analysis of filling quality of three different endodontic sealers. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017;46(8):20170223. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170223.
  45. Volponi A, Pelegrine RA, Kato AS, et al. Micro-computed tomographic assessment of supplementary cleaning techniques for removing bioceramic sealer and Gutta-percha in oval canals. J Endod 2020;46(12):1901–1906. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.010.
  46. Carvalho CN, Grazziotin-Soares R, de Miranda Candeiro GT, et al. Micro push-out bond strength and bioactivity analysis of a bioceramic root canal sealer. Iran Endod J 2017;12(3):343–348. DOI: 10.22037/iej.v12i3.16091.
  47. Sousa-Neto MD, Silva Coelho FI, Marchesan MA, et al. Ex vivo study of the adhesion of an epoxy-based sealer to human dentine submitted to irradiation with Er : YAG and Nd : YAG lasers. Int Endod J 2005;38(12):866–870. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01027.x.
  48. Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, et al. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod 2013;39(10):1281–1286. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012.
  49. Kim H, Kim E, Lee SJ, et al. Comparisons of the retreatment efficacy of calcium silicate and epoxy resin-based sealers and residual sealer in dentinal tubules. J Endod 2015;41(12):2025–2030. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.030.
  50. Bramante CM, Fidelis NS, Assumpção TS, et al. Heat release, time required, and cleaning ability of MTwo R and ProTaper universal retreatment systems in the removal of filling material. J Endod 2010;36(11):1870–1873. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.013.
  51. Cornelissen B, Buttiens L, Bottenberg P, et al. Comparison of Reciproc and Reciproc blue NiTi instruments in re-treating root canals filled with a calcium-silicate–based or epoxy resin–based sealer: an in vitro study. ENDO-Endod Practice Today 2020;14(2):125–133. Available from:
  52. Nevares G, de Albuquerque DS, Freire LG, et al. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in removing obturation material from severely curved root canals: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2016;42(5):803–808. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.010.
  53. Fruchi Lde C, Ordinola-Zapata R, Cavenago BC, et al. Efficacy of reciprocating instruments for removing filling material in curved canals obturated with a single-cone technique: a micro-computed tomographic analysis. J Endod 2014;40(7):1000–1004. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.011.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.