The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2021 ) > List of Articles

EDITORIAL

Mechanical Characteristics, Testing, and Future Perspective of Nickel–Titanium Rotary Instruments

Maurilio D'Angelo, Federico Valenti Obino, Andrea Cicconetti

Citation Information : D'Angelo M, Obino FV, Cicconetti A. Mechanical Characteristics, Testing, and Future Perspective of Nickel–Titanium Rotary Instruments. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (11):1225-1226.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3230

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 24-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Abstract

HTML PDF Share
  1. Bhandi S, Seracchiani M, Donfrancesco O, et al. Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: An In Vitro Comparison (Torsional Resistance of Two Heat-treated Reciprocating Files). J Contemp Dent Pract 2021;22(4):361–364. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3081.
  2. Zanza A, Seracchiani M, Di Nardo D, et al. A Paradigm Shift for Torsional Stiffness of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: A Finite Element Analysis. J Endod 2021;47(7):1149–1156. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.04.017.
  3. Seracchiani M, Donfrancesco O, Relucenti M, et al. In Vitro Evaluation of a Recently Developed Rotary File: AF Rotary. Braz Dent Sci 2021;24(4). DOI: 10.14295/bds.2021.v24i4.2558.
  4. Seracchiani M, Miccoli G, Reda R, et al. A Comprehensive In Vitro Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Two Rotary Endodontic Instruments. World J Dent 2020;11(3):185–188. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015–1729.
  5. Zanza A, Seracchiani M, Reda R, et al. Role of the Crystallographic Phase of NiTi Rotary Instruments in Determining Their Torsional Resistance during Different Bending Conditions. Materials (Basel) 2021;14(21):6324. DOI: 10.3390/ma14216324.
  6. Gambarini G, Miccoli G, Seracchiani M, et al. Role of the Flat-Designed Surface in Improving the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic NiTi Rotary Instruments. Materials (Basel) 2019;12(16):2523. DOI: 10.3390/ma12162523.
  7. Zanza A, D'Angelo M, Reda R, et al. An Update on Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Endodontics: Mechanical Characteristics, Testing and Future Perspective-An Overview. Bioengineering (Basel) 2021;8(12):218. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering8120218.
  8. Gambarini G, Miccoli G, Seracchiani M, et al. Fatigue Resistance of New and Used Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: a Comparative Study. Clin Ter 2018;169(3):e96–e101. DOI: 10.7417/T.2018.2061.
  9. Duque JA, Bramante CM, Duarte MAH, et al. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Nickel-Titanium Reciprocating Instruments after Simulated Clinical Use. J Endod 2020;46(11):1771–1775. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.08.010.
  10. Gambarini G, Miccoli G, D'Angelo M, et al. The relevance of operative torque and torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A preliminary clinical investigation. Saudi Endod J 2020;10:260–264. DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_157_19.
  11. Bhandi S, Mashyakhy M, Abumelha AS, et al. Complete Obturation-Cold Lateral Condensation vs. Thermoplastic Techniques: A Systematic Review of Micro-CT Studies. Materials (Basel) 2021; 14(14):4013. DOI: 10.3390/ma14144013.
  12. Reda R, Zanza A, Cicconetti A, et al. Ultrasound Imaging in Dentistry: A Literature Overview. J Imaging 2021;7(11):238. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging7110238.
  13. Patil S, Alkahtani A, Bhandi S, et al. Ultrasound Imaging versus Radiographs in Differentiating Periapical Lesions: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(7):1208. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071208.
  14. Gambarini G, Ropini P, Piasecki L, et al. A Preliminary Assessment of a New Dedicated Endodontic Software for Use with CBCT Images to Evaluate the Canal Complexity of Mandibular Molars. Int Endod J 2018;51(3):259–268. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12845.
  15. Valenti-Obino F, Di Nardo D, Quero L, et al. Symmetry of Root and Root Canal Morphology of Mandibular Incisors: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study In Vivo. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11(6):e527–e533. DOI: 10.4317/jced.55629.
  16. Pulyodan MK, Paramel Mohan S, Valsan D, et al. Regenerative Endodontics: A Paradigm Shift in Clinical Endodontics. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2020;12(Suppl 1):S20–S26. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_112_20.
  17. Bhandi S, Alkahtani A, Reda R, et al. Parathyroid Hormone Secretion and Receptor Expression Determine the Age-Related Degree of Osteogenic Differentiation in Dental Pulp Stem Cells. J Pers Med 2021;11(5):349. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050349.
  18. Patil S, Reda R, Boreak N, et al. Adipogenic Stimulation and Pyrrolidine Dithiocarbamate Induced Osteogenic Inhibition of Dental Pulp Stem Cells Is Countered by Cordycepin. J Pers Med 2021;11(9):915. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090915.
  19. Muruganandhan J, Sujatha G, Poorni S, et al. Comparison of Four Dental Pulp-Capping Agents by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Histological Techniques—A Split-Mouth Design Ex Vivo Study. Appl Sci 2021;11:3045. DOI: 10.3390/app11073045.
  20. Bhandi S, Alkahtani A, Mashyakhy M, et al. Effect of Ascorbic Acid on Differentiation, Secretome and Stemness of Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Tooth (SHEDs). J Pers Med 2021;11(7):589. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11070589.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.