The interaction between periodontics and fixed prosthodontic area is the key of an adequated treatment planning which involves gingival smile to provide function and an esthetic condition in association with an esthetic, resistant and predictable material.
How to cite this article
Zavanelli AC, Mazaro JVQ, Mestrener SR, Zavanelli RA. Functional and Esthetic Rehabilitation with In-Ceram Alumina and Zirconia System: A Multidisciplinary Approach. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(1):68-72.
Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:316-20.
An up to 5-year clinical evaluation of posterior In-Ceram CAD-CAM core crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:451-56.
Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:7-22.
Flexural strength of In-Ceram alumina and In-Ceram zirconia core materials. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:183-88.
Effect of ion exchange on the microstructure, strength, and thermal expansion behavior of a leucitereinforced porcelain. J Dent Res 1998;77:583-88.
Shading Vita In-Ceram YZ substructures; influence on value and choroma, (Part II). Int J Comput Dent 2004;7:379-88.
Ceramic behavior under different environmental and loading conditions. In: Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley WA, Watts DC (Eds). Dental materials in vivo: Aging and related phenomena. Chicago: Quintessence 2003:35-45.
Fiveyear follow-up with Procera all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 2005;36:105-13.
A comparison of all-ceramic restorative systems (Part 2). Gen Dent 2000;48:38-40.
