The study was aimed at esthetic and functional results as well as patient tolerance after reconstruction with reconstruction plate. The follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years.
Materials and methods
A retrospective study of 36 patients who had mandibular reconstruction with AO/ASIF stainless steel reconstruction plates after oncologic resection was evaluated. The indications and postoperative outcomes were studied.
Results
At the end of study, 24 of 36 patients (67%) still had the plate in place. Around three (8%) plates were fractured. Nine (25%) plates got exposed leading to surgical intervention. Surgical results were satisfying, particularly when looking at delayed healing or long-term tolerance. Esthetic (79% rated results as good or acceptable) and functional results of this reconstruction were satisfying.
Conclusion
We conclude by saying that reconstruction plate provides a solution for safe and rapid mandibular reconstruction for patients with poor prognosis or poor condition. This method also preserves the possibility of secondary reconstruction.
Clinical significance
The reconstruction plate may be a good clinical choice for safe and rapid mandibular reconstruction.
How to cite this article
Harsha G, Reddy SGK, Talasila S, Salaam SA, Srinivasulu M, Reddy VS. Mandibular Reconstruction using AO/ASIF Stainless Steel Reconstruction Plate: A Retrospective Study of 36 Cases. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(1):75-79.
Interet des endoprostheses metalliquex en reconstruction mandibularire. Thesis, Toulouse, France, Universite de toukouse-pual Sabatier, 1996.
Primary mandibular reconstruction with bridging plates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1994;22:43.
Conseptual consideration in mandibular reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1995;22:61.
Classification on mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:1266.
Rigid reconstruction plates for immediate reconstruction following mandibular resection for malignant tumors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:1158.
Les reconstruction mandibularies en cancerrolgie. Disscussion des indications. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1995;40:358.
Long-term evaluation of patients undergoing immediate mandibular reconstruction. Am J Surg 1995;170:517.
Osteosynthetic titanium miniplate fixation of composite radial forearm flap in mandibular reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1991;19:243.
Oromandibular reconstruction with osseous free flap: Functional results. Ann, Otolaryngo Chir, Cervico Fac 2007;124:16-24.
Long-term results of jaw reconstruction with microsurgical fibula grafts and dental implants. JOMS 2007;65:1005-09.
Evaluation of fibula free flap donor site morbidity. Amj J Otolaryngology 2006;27:29-32.
Reconstruction plates to bridge mandibular defects: A clinical and experimental investigation in biomechanical aspects. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1999;28:445.
Soft tissue coverage of mandibular reconstruction plates. Head Neck 1994;16:112.
Critical analysis of mandibular reconstruction using AO reconstruction plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:1152.
Resultats de l'utilisation des plaques de reconstruction mandibulaire en titane. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 1994;95:274.
Assessment of plate use for mandibular reconstruction: Has changing technology made a difference? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;121:388.
The use of titanium mandibular reconstruction plates in patients with oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:288.
Factors involved in long and short term mandibular plate exposure. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:217.
Volume length impact of lateral jaw resections on complication rates. Arch Otolaryngol Head and Neck 1999;125:68.
The bridging mandibular reconstruction plate revisited. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:988.
Scope and limitations of methods of mandibular reconstruction: A longterm follow-up. BJOMS 2010;48(2):100-04.
Mandibular reconstruction and second generation locking reconstruction plates: Outcome of 110 patients. IJOMS 2009;38:960-63.
Marginal and segmental mandibulectomy in patients with oral cancer: A statistical analysis of 106 cases. JOMS 2003;61:1289-96.
Biomechanical analysis of the strength of the mandible after marginal resection. JOMS 2011;69(6):1798-806.