The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of Charcoal and Sea Salt–Lemon-based Whitening Toothpastes on Color Change and Surface Roughness of Stained Teeth

Rawda H ElAziz, Lamia K Gadallah, Reham S Saleh

Keywords : Charcoal-based whitening toothpaste, Color change, Natural whitening toothpastes, Sea salt–lemon whitening toothpaste, Surface roughness

Citation Information : ElAziz RH, Gadallah LK, Saleh RS. Evaluation of Charcoal and Sea Salt–Lemon-based Whitening Toothpastes on Color Change and Surface Roughness of Stained Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (2):169-175.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3300

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 10-06-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy of two naturally based commercially available whitening toothpastes charcoal and sea salt–lemon on stain removal of teeth in terms of color change and surface roughness. Materials and methods: Twenty-seven intact bovine incisors were selected and randomly allocated into three main groups (n = 9) according to the tested toothpaste [I: Signal Complete 8 Charcoal; II: sea salt–lemon essence Closeup natural smile; and III: Signal Complete 8 Original (control)]. Following 4 successive days of staining protocol, each specimen in its corresponding group was brushed with the toothpaste using toothbrush simulator apparatus for three brushing cycles. Color assessment using Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer and surface roughness (Ra) measurement using contact type profilometer were performed for each specimen at baseline, after staining, and after each tooth brushing cycle. Results: Nonparametric color data and parametric surface roughness data were analyzed. The color difference (ΔE) from after-staining protocol to different tooth brushing cycles (1,2,3) showed no significant difference on each cycle between the tested groups (p >0.05). While for color difference (ΔE) from baseline to the last tooth brushing cycle 3, the difference between groups was statistically significant where group II, sea salt–lemon-based toothpaste, had a significantly lowest (ΔE00) value (p <0.001) indicating more whitening effect in relation to others. However, a significant increase in surface roughness was present in all tested groups (p <0.001); meanwhile, there was no significant difference between tested groups (p >0.05). Conclusion: After three tooth brushing cycles, none of the natural whitening toothpastes or conventional toothpastes produced had effective whitening results nor completely removed the stains back to the initial baseline tooth color. Sea salt–lemon-based whitening toothpaste had a whitening effect better than the charcoal-based toothpaste. All of the tested toothpastes increased the degree of surface roughness. Clinical relevance: Charcoal and sea salt–lemon-based whitening toothpastes do not guarantee to whiten nor completely remove the stains back to normal and their effects on enamel surface roughness should be highly clinically considered and managed.


PDF Share
  1. Policy on the use of dental bleaching for child and adolescent patients. Pediatr Dent 2018;40(6):92–94. PMID: 32074862.
  2. Epple M, Meyer F, Enax J. A critical review of modern concepts for teeth whitening. Dent J 2019;7(3). DOI: 10.3390/dj7030079.
  3. Mehrgan S, Kermanshah H, Omrani LR, et al. Comparison the effect of charcoal-containing, hydrogen peroxide-containing, and abrasive whitening toothpastes on color stability of a resin composite; an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2021;21(1):594. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01956-8.
  4. Sultan MS, Niazy MA. Effect of actilux-activated whitening toothpaste and marine salts on color change and microhardness of bovine enamel. Al-Azhar Dent J Girls 2020;7(4-C):559–570. DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2020.31646.1273.
  5. Eachempati P, Kumbargere Nagraj S, Kiran Kumar Krishanappa S, et al. Home-based chemically-induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults. Cochrane database Syst Rev 2018;12(12):CD006202. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006202.pub2.
  6. Ghajari MF, Shamsaei M, Basandeh K, et al. Abrasiveness and whitening effect of charcoal-containing whitening toothpastes in permanent teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2021;18:51. PMID: 34497686.
  7. Vaz VTP, Jubilato DP, Oliveira MRM de, et al. Whitening toothpaste containing activated charcoal, blue covarine, hydrogen peroxide or microbeads: which one is the most effective? J Appl Oral Sci 2019;27:e20180051. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0051.
  8. Koc Vural U, Bagdatli Z, Yilmaz AE, et al. Effects of charcoal-based whitening toothpastes on human enamel in terms of color, surface roughness, and microhardness: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25(10):5977–5985. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03903-x.
  9. Nainan MT, Balan AK, Sharma R, et al. The comparison of the effects of different whitening toothpastes on the micro hardness of a nano hybrid composite resin. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(6):550–554. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.144593.
  10. International Standards Organization. Dental materials—Guidance on testing of wear—Part 1: Wear by toothbrushing. ISO/TR 2007;14569-1.
  11. Elsayed MA, Nabieh SM, Mohammed N, et al. Effect of home care whitening methods on surface roughness of low shrinkage composite (in vitro study). Al-Azhar J Dent Sci 2017;20(2):175–179. DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2017.107507.
  12. Vieira-Junior WF, Lima DANL, Tabchoury CPM, et al. Effect of toothpaste application prior to dental bleaching on whitening effectiveness and enamel properties. Oper Dent 2016;41(1):E29–E38. DOI: 10.2341/15-042-L.
  13. Xavier SR, Pilownic KJ, Gastmann AH, et al. Bovine tooth discoloration induced by endodontic filling materials for primary teeth. Int J Dent 2017;2017:7401962. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7401962.
  14. Lee Y-K. Color correlations among six types of permanent anterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent Off Publ Am Acad Esthet Dent 2016;28 Suppl 1:S5–S13. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12193.
  15. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria No Title. 2021. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/.
  16. Chen H, Huang J, Dong X, et al. A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching. Quintessence Int 2012;43(8):649–659. PMID: 23034418.
  17. Casado BGS, Moraes SLD, Souza GFM, et al. Efficacy of dental bleaching with whitening dentifrices: a systematic review. Int J Dent 2018;2018:7868531. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7868531.
  18. Basson RA, Grobler SR, Kotze TJ vW, et al. Guidelines for the selection of tooth whitening products amongst those available on the market. SADJ J South African Dent Assoc = Tydskr van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkd Ver 2013;68(3):122–129. PMID: 23951776.
  19. Enax J, Epple M. Characterization of abrasives in toothpastes. Ger Dent Z 2018;73:100–108.
  20. Farghal N, Elkafrawy H. The effects of activated charcoal and calcium carbonate based toothpastes on surface properties of composite resin restorative materials. Egypt Dent J 2020;66(4):2431–2438. DOI: 10.21608/EDJ.2020.35084.1170.
  21. Sharif N, MacDonald E, Hughes J, et al. The chemical stain removal properties of “whitening” toothpaste products: studies in vitro. Br Dent J 2000;188(11):620–624. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800557.
  22. Nam SH, Kwun HS, Cheon SH, et al. Effects of whitening toothpaste on color change and mineral contents of dental hard tissues. Biomed Res 2017;28(9):3832–3836.
  23. Dionysopoulos D, Papageorgiou S, Malletzidou L, et al. Effect of novel charcoal-containing whitening toothpaste and mouthwash on color change and surface morphology of enamel. J Conserv Dent 2020;23(6):624–631. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_570_20.
  24. Palandi S da S, Kury M, Picolo MZD, et al. Effects of activated charcoal powder combined with toothpastes on enamel color change and surface properties. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32(8):783–790. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12646.
  25. Mitiko G, Hori R, Catelan A. Whitening effect of brushing with activated charcoal-based products on enamel: integrative review [Efeito branqueador da escovação com produtos a base de carvão ativado no esmalte: revisão integrative. Efecto blanqueador del cepillado con productos a base]. Res Soc Dev 2021;2021:1–8. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i15.22809.
  26. Ramadan AA, Ali MS, Bayoumi RE. Effect of abrasive containing whitening dentifrices on surface characteristics and color stability of two aesthetic restorative materials. Al-Azhar Dent J Girls 2020; 7(4-C):537–546. DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2020.14152.1178.
  27. Franco MC, Uehara J, Meroni BM, et al. The effect of a charcoal-based powder for enamel dental bleaching. Oper Dent 2020;45(6):618–623. DOI: 10.2341/19-122-L.
  28. Yilmaz MN, Gul P, Unal M, et al. Effects of whitening toothpastes on the esthetic properties and surface roughness of a composite resin. J Oral Sci 2021;63(4):320–325. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd. 21-0044.
  29. Rahardjo A, Graciá E, Riska G, et al. Potential side effects of whitening toothpaste on enamel roughness and micro hardness. Int J Clin Prev Dent 2015;11:239–242. DOI: 10.15236/ijcpd.2015.11.4.239.
  30. Roopa KB, Basappa N, Prabhakar AR, et al. Effect of whitening dentifrice on micro hardness, colour stability and surface roughness of aesthetic restorative materials. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(3): ZC06–ZC11. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15700.7350.
  31. Bolay S, Cakir FY, Gurgan S. Effects of toothbrushing with fluoride abrasive and whitening dentifrices on both unbleached and bleached human enamel surface in terms of roughness and hardness: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(5): 584–589. PMID: 23250157.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.