The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of the Percentage of Gutta-percha Filled Areas in Canals Obturated with Different Obturation Techniques

Kamal Dhangar, Prashant Shetty, Saleem D Makandar, Pradeep A Bapna, Nik Rozainah Nik Abdul Ghani, Wan Zaripah Wan Bakar, Sandeep Metgud

Keywords : Guttacore, Lateral condensation, Single cone

Citation Information : Dhangar K, Shetty P, Makandar SD, Bapna PA, Ghani NR, Bakar WZ, Metgud S. Comparative Evaluation of the Percentage of Gutta-percha Filled Areas in Canals Obturated with Different Obturation Techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (2):176-180.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3306

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 10-06-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the percentage of gutta-percha filled areas (PGFA) in canals obturated with guttacore system, single cone, and lateral compaction techniques. Materials and methods: A total of 60 single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected and randomly divided into three equal groups depending on the type of obturation technique used. After the obturation, the samples were marked at 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm distance from the apex and sectioned horizontally, and viewed under a stereomicroscope at 25×. The area of the canal and of the filling material was recorded, and the percentage of filling material on the canal wall was calculated. Results: Guttacore showed the highest percentage of root-filled areas followed by single cone and lateral compaction techniques at 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm from the apex. Conclusion: None of the filling techniques used in the study was completely able to fill the root canals with gutta-percha and sealer. The guttacore system had a maximum area of root canals filled as compared to the single cone and lateral compaction system. Clinical significance: Root canals are mostly oval, elongated, or irregularly shaped rather than being completely round. Hence, the obturation technique that fills the maximum area of the root canal must be selected according to the given clinical circumstances.


PDF Share
  1. Gutmann JL, Lovdahl PE. Problem Solving in Endodontics-E-Book: Prevention, Identification and Management. Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam, 2010.
  2. Gatewood RS. Endodontic materials. Dent Clin North Am. Elsevier Health Sciences 2007;51(3):695–712. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.04.005.
  3. Kenneth HM, Cohen S. Cohen's Pathway of Pulp. 10th ed. St. Louis, Missouri.
  4. Bhandi SH, Subhash TS. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three newer root canal obturating materials Guttaflow, Resilon and Thermafil: an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2013;5(1):54–65. PMID: PMC3768085.
  5. Ingle JI, Simon JH, Machtou P, et al. Outcome of endodontic treatment and re-treatment. Endodontics. 12th ed. 2002;5:678.
  6. Marques-Ferreira M, Abrantes M, Ferreira H-D, et al. Sealing efficacy of system B versus Thermafil and Guttacore obturation techniques evidenced by scintigraphic analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(1): e56–e60. DOI: 10.4317/jced.52889.
  7. Whitworth J. Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices. Endod Top 2005;12(1):2–4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00198.x.
  8. Schäfer E, Schrenker C, Zupanc J, et al. Percentage of gutta-percha filled areas in canals obturated with cross-linked gutta-percha core-carrier systems, single-cone and lateral compaction technique. J Endod 2016;42(2):294–298. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.018.
  9. Al Qassab SJ, Al Hadi D, Luke AM. Evaluation of three different obturation techniques using three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: in vitro study. Dentistry 2016;6(12):403. DOI: 10.4172/2161-1122.1000403.
  10. Mollo A, Botti G, Prinicipi Goldoni N, et al. Efficacy of two Ni-Ti systems and hand files for removing gutta-percha from root canals. Int Endod J 2012;45(1):1–6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365–2591.2011.01932.x.
  11. Li GH, Niu LN, Selem LC, et al. Quality of obturation achieved by an endodontic core-carrier system with crosslinked gutta-percha carrier in single-rooted canals. J Dent 2014;42(9):1124–1134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.008.
  12. Makandar SD, Khaiser MI, Mali SR, et al. Plywood Jig—a new technique for root canal curvature measurement. Appl Sci 2021;11(9):3999. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093999.
  13. Khandagale PD, Shetty PP, Makandar SD, et al. Evaluation of cyclic fatigue of Hyflex EDM, twisted files, and ProTaper gold manufactured with different processes: an in vitro study. Int J Dent 2021:7402658. DOI: 10.1155/2021/7402658.
  14. Beatty RG, Baker PS, Haddix J, et al. The efficacy of four root canal obturation techniques in preventing apical dye penetration. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;119(5):633–637. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8177(89) 95017-4.
  15. Barthel CR, Moshonov J, Shuping G, et al. Bacterial leakage versus dye leakage in obturated root canals. Int Endod J 1999;32(5):370–375. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00235.x.
  16. Al-Dewani N, Hayes SJ, Dummer PM. Comparison of laterally condensed and low-temperature thermoplasticized gutta-percha root fillings. J Endod 2000;26(12):733–738. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200012000-00018.
  17. Wu MK, Kašt’áková A, Wesselink PR. Quality of cold and warm gutta-percha fillings in oval canals in mandibular premolars. Int Endod J 2001;34(6):485–491. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00463.x.
  18. Clinton K, Himel TV. Comparison of a warm gutta-percha obturation technique and lateral condensation. J Endod 2001;27(11):692–695. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200111000-00010.
  19. Hauman CHJ, Love RM. Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: a review. Part 1. Intracanal drugs and substances. Int Endod J 2003;36(2):75–85. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00631.x.
  20. De-Deus G, Gurgel-Filho ED, Magalhães KM, et al. A laboratory analysis of gutta-percha-filled area obtained using Thermafil, System B and lateral condensation. Int Endod J 2006;39(5):378–383. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01082.x.
  21. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. J Endod 2006;32(4):281–290. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.02.007.
  22. Leduc J, Fishelberg G. Endodontic obturation: a review. Gen Dent 2003;51(3):232–233. PMID: 15055706.
  23. Pereira AC, Nishiyama CK, de Castro Pinto L. Single-cone obturation technique: a literature review. RSBO 2012;9(4):442–447. https://doi.org/10.21726/rsbo.v9i4.1026.
  24. Crasta SA, Nanjundasetty JK, Panuganti V, et al. Volumetric analysis of root canals obturated with cold lateral condensation, single-cone and thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro study. Saudi Endod J 2014;4(2):64–69. DOI: 10.4103/1658-5984.132720.
  25. Asheibi F, Qualtrough AJE, Mellor A. Fracture resistance of resilon-filled roots following different retreatment techniques. J Res Prac Dent 2014;2014(2014). Article ID 966831. DOI: 10.5171/2014.966831.
  26. Chokkalingam M, Ramaprabha DK. Three-dimensional helical computed tomographic evaluation of three obturation techniques: in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2011;14(3):273–276. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.85815.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.