The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Evaluation of Immediately Loaded Parallel Conical Connection Implants with Platform Switch in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Prospective Clinical Study

Haripriyanka K Raj, T Krishan Mohan, Vivekanand Kattimani, Raghunadh Sreerama, Yella Ramya, Chaitanya K Inampudi

Keywords : Esthetics, Immediate loading protocol, Nobel parallel conical connection implant, Platform switch, Prosthesis replacement

Citation Information : Raj HK, Mohan TK, Kattimani V, Sreerama R, Ramya Y, Inampudi CK. Evaluation of Immediately Loaded Parallel Conical Connection Implants with Platform Switch in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Prospective Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (4):405-414.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3274

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 11-07-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aim: To assess immediately loaded parallel conical connection (Nobel Biocare) implants with platform switch design in the maxillary esthetic zone for soft and hard tissue changes. Materials and methods: A total of 20 patients (n = 20) underwent prosthetic replacement of the missing maxillary anterior tooth, with an immediately loaded parallel conical connection implant (Noble Biocare, Sweden) having a platform switch design. The size of the implant was 3.75 mm in width and 13 mm in length for all patients and placement followed a standardized surgical protocol. Postoperatively, acrylic provisionalization was done within 48 hours followed by a definitive zirconia prosthesis in the 3rd month. Clinically and radiographically, the implants were evaluated for hard tissue (bone density, implant stability, crestal bone loss) and soft tissue changes (mucosal thickness—MT, sulcus probing depth—PD, bleeding on probing—BOP, width of keratinized gingiva—KG) at baseline till 36 months with follow-up intervals after loading. Results: All patients showed uneventful healing. The difference in implant stability and density scores was significant (p <0.05*) from baseline to 36 months indicating bone formation and osseointegration of the implant. Bleeding on probing was not observed, and probing depth remained within the acceptable range (≤5 mm) at all time intervals after loading. The marginal bone loss was minimal (≤0.2 mm annually) with the absence of implant mobility and without any peri-implant radiolucency. The thickness of the gingiva (3.47 ± 0.34 mm) and width of keratinized gingiva (2.46 ± 0.39 mm) remained within reasonable limits at the 36th month with acceptable esthetic appearance. Conclusion: In the present study, immediate loading of Nobel parallel conical connection implant in the maxillary anterior region provided adequate primary stability, minimal marginal bone loss, and increased bone density indicating earlier osseointegration. Decreased probing depth, absence of bleeding on probing, and adequate tissue collar at the neck showed better soft tissue emergence in the esthetic zone. The platform switch design demonstrated promising results and therefore can be used as an alternative to the conventional method. Clinical significance: The present study results suggest that parallel conical connection implants (Nobel Biocare) with TiUnite surface, built-in platform switch combined with conical connection interface, parallel walled body, tapered apex, and double threads from tip to platform are all designed to provide high primary stability and support immediate function protocol, hence can be used flexibly in different bone densities.

PDF Share
  1. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed. New Delhi, India: Elsevier; 2008.
  2. Babbush CA, Hahn J, Krauser J, et al. Dental implants–the art and science. Missouri: Saunders; 2010.
  3. Henry PJ, Liddelow GJ. Immediate loading of dental implants. Aust Dent J 2008;53 Suppl 1(s1):S69–S81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00044.x.
  4. Behl N. ITI treatment guide. Volume 4: loading protocols in implant dentistry. Edentulous patients. Br Dent J 2011;210(8):390. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.330.
  5. Gallucci GO, Morton D, Weber HP. Loading protocols for dental implants in edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:132–146. PMID: 19885441.
  6. Weber HP, Morton D, Gallucci GO, et al. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:180–183. PMID: 19885445.
  7. Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, et al. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:110–117. PMID: 19885438.
  8. Bhardwaj I, Bhushan A, Baiju CS, et al. Evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue and bone levels around early loaded implant in restoring single missing tooth: a clinico-radiographic study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2016;20(1):36–41. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.168486.
  9. Bedrossian E. Implant treatment planning for the edentulous patient–a graftless approach to immediate loading. China: Mosby; 2010.
  10. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Zhang K, et al. Immediate loading of single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. Preliminary results after one year. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(2):180–187. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140207.x.
  11. Fischer K, Bäckström M, Sennerby L. Immediate and early loading of oxidized tapered implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: a 1-year prospective clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11(2):69–80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00096.x.
  12. Schincaglia GP, Marzola R, Giovanni GF, et al. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23(3):474–480. PMID: 18700371.
  13. Vandamme K, Naert I, Geris L, et al. Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri-implant bone formation. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34(2):172–181. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.01014.x.
  14. Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15(2):142–149. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01014.x.
  15. Kim JH, Kim YY, Yi YJ, et al. Results of immediate loading for implant restoration in partially edentulous patients: a 6-month preliminary prospective study using SinusQuickTM EB implant system. J Adv Prosthodont 2009;1(3):136–139. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2009.1.3.136.
  16. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, et al. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2(2):81–90. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020206.x.
  17. Zigdon H, Machtei EE. The dimensions of keratinized mucosa around implants affect clinical and immunological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(4):387–392. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01492.x.
  18. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;15(1):39–52. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9785(86)80010-2.
  19. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986 Summer;1(1):11–25. PMID: 3527955.
  20. Fiorellini J, Kim D, Ishikawa S. The gingiva. In: Carranza's clinical periodontology. W.B. Saunders Co; 2006. p. 46–67.
  21. Mehta P, Lum L. The width of the attached gingiva–much ado about nothing? J Dent 2010;38(7):517–525. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.04.007.
  22. Lang NP, Löe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol 1972;43(10):623–627. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.10.623.
  23. Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, et al. Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(10):1170–1177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01795.x.
  24. Adibrad M, Shahabuei M, Sahabi M. Significance of the width of keratinized mucosa on the health status of the supporting tissue around implants supporting overdentures. J Oral Implantol 2009;35(5):232–237. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00035.1.
  25. Bouri A Jr, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, et al. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23(2):323–326. PMID: 18548930.
  26. Kim BS, Kim YK, Yun PY, et al. Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(3):e24–e28. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.010.
  27. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. Peri-implant tissue and radiographic bone levels in the immediately restored single-tooth implant: a retrospective analysis. J Periodontol 2008;79(2):252–259. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070342.
  28. Heydenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA, et al. Two-part implants inserted in a one-stage or a two-stage procedure. A prospective comparative study. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(10):901–909. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.291005.x.
  29. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Gröndahl K. 3-year followup study of early single implant restorations ad modum Brånemark. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1990;10(5):340–349. PMID: 2098358.
  30. Bauman GR, Mills M, Rapley JW, et al. Clinical parameters of evaluation during implant maintenance. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 Summer;7(2):220–227. PMID: 1398839.
  31. Papaspyridakos P, Lal K. Immediate loading of the maxilla with prefabricated interim prosthesis using interactive planning software, and CAD/CAM rehabilitation with definitive zirconia prosthesis: 2-year clinical follow-up: Prefabricated interim prosthesis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22(4):223–232. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00343.x.
  32. Ohta K, Takechi M, Minami M, et al. Influence of factors related to implant stability detected by wireless resonance frequency analysis device. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37(2):131–137. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02032.x.
  33. Zechner W, Tangl S, Fürst G, et al. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types: a histologic and histomorphometric study in mini-pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(2):150–157. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140203.x.
  34. Schüpbach P, Glauser R, Rocci A, et al. The human bone-oxidized titanium implant interface: a light microscopic, scanning electron microscopic, back-scatter scanning electron microscopic, and energy-dispersive x-ray study of clinically retrieved dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:S36–S43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00073.x.
  35. Ivanoff C-J, Widmark G, Johansson C, et al. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(3):341–348. PMID: 12814308.
  36. Hall J, Miranda-Burgos P, Sennerby L. Stimulation of directed bone growth at oxidized titanium implants by macroscopic grooves: an in vivo study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:S76–S82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00078.x.
  37. Lachmann S, Laval JY, Axmann D, et al. Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(2): 347–355. PMID: 21483888.
  38. Agliardi EL, Pozzi A, Stappert CFJ, et al. Immediate fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: a prospective clinical and radiological study after 3 years of loading: Immediate fixed maxillary implant rehabilitations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16(2):292–302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00482.x.
  39. Tallarico M, Vaccarella A, Marzi GC, et al. A prospective case-control clinical trial comparing 1- and 2-stage Nobel Biocare TiUnite implants: resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell Mentor during integration. Quintessence Int 2011;42(8):635–644. PMID: 21842003.
  40. Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, et al. Posterior maxillary implants inserted with bicortical anchorage and placed in immediate function for partial or complete edentulous rehabilitations. A retrospective clinical study with a median follow-up of 7 years. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;19(1):19–27. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-014-0444-7.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.