The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during the Polymerization of Different Adhesive Resin Materials: An In Vitro Study

Pawankumar Kamalapurkar, Pavithra K Ramanna, Suneel V Vadavadagi, Shreeshail Indi, Konsam Bidya Devi, Vineetha Chakravarthy Srinivas

Keywords : Adhesive resin cements, Intrapulpal, Polymerization, Thermal changes

Citation Information : Kamalapurkar P, Ramanna PK, Vadavadagi SV, Indi S, Devi KB, Srinivas VC. Comparative Evaluation of Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during the Polymerization of Different Adhesive Resin Materials: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (5):539-542.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3292

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 10-08-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: Aim of this study was to assess the thermal changes within the pulp at the time of polymerization of three different adhesive resin materials. Materials and methods: Sixty human premolar teeth that had been recently extracted for orthodontic reasons and were devoid of dental caries/flaws were included in this research. Following preparation of the cavities, all 60 samples consisting of 20 premolars in every group, depending on the adhesive resins that were positioned as were assigned at random to one of the following three groups: Group I: RelyX self-adhesive resin cement; Group II: Breeze self-adhesive resin cement; Group III: Pan F self-etch adhesive resin cement. The temperature changes were calculated using a thermocouple wire attached to a digital thermometer. The dissimilarities amid the baseline temperature as well as the temperatures at different time intervals (1, 5, 10, and 15 minutes) were established. Results: The thermal value was higher at first minute (1.84 ± 0.34) and gradually reduced at 5 minutes (1.36 ± 0.29), 10 minutes (0.62 ± 0.11), and 15 minutes (0.06 ± 0.03) in RelyX self-adhesive resin cement. The maximum thermal value was found at the first minute (2.66 ± 0.21) and gradually reduced at 5 minutes (1.42 ± 0.13), 10 minutes (0.86 ± 0.09), and 15 minutes (0.28 ± 0.01) in Breeze self-adhesive resin cement. The higher thermal value was found at the first minute (1.98 ± 0.19) and gradually reduced at 5 minutes (1.49 ± 0.14), 10 minutes (0.76 ± 0.10), and 15 minutes (0.16 ± 0.09) in Pan F self-etch adhesive resin cement and there was a statistically significant difference found between various time points and with all three adhesive resin material groups (p <0.001). Conclusion: This current research arrived at a conclusion that each of the three adhesive resin substances showed a safe temperature change within the pulp. However, the lowest heat scores within the pulp were depicted by RelyX self-adhesive resin in pursuit by Pan F self-etch adhesive resin cement as well as the Breeze self-adhesive resin cement in that order. Clinical significance: The clinical triumph of a restoration is dependent partially on the method of cementation, which is utilized to establish a connection amid the restoration and the tooth. Temporary and permanent pulp inflammation can be avoided by the decreased temperature changes in the adhesive resin cement at the time of polymerization.


PDF Share
  1. Oztürk B, Uşümez A, Oztürk AN, et al. In vitro assessment of temperature change in the pulp chamber during cavity preparation.J Prosthet Dent 2004;91(5):436−440. DOI: 10.1016/S0022391304001131.
  2. Ratih DN, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Temperature change, dentinal fluid flow and cuspal displacement during resin composite restoration. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34(9):693−701. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01764.x.
  3. Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Tango RN, et al. Pulp chamber temperature changes during resin composite photoactivation. Braz J Oral Sci 2005;4(12):685−688. DOI: 10.20396/bjos.v4i12.8641798.
  4. Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Dionysopoulos D, Koumpia E, et al. Pulp chamber temperature rise during resin composite polymerization. Balk J Stom 2011;15:150−154. http://balkandentaljournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Pulp-chamber-temperature-rise-during-resin-composite-polymerization.pdf.
  5. Uhl A, Mills RW, Jandt KD. Polymerization and light-induced heat of dental composites cured with LED and halogen technology. Biomaterials 2003;24(1):1809−1820. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00585-9.
  6. Kwon SJ, Park YJ, Jun SH, et al. Thermal irritation of teeth during dental treatment procedures. Restor Dent Endod 2013;38(3):105−112. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2013.38.3.105.
  7. Attrill DC, Davies RM, King TA, et al. Thermal effects of the Er:YAG laser on a simulated dental pulp: a quantitative evaluation of the effects of a water spray. J Dent 2004;32(1):35−40. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00137-4.
  8. Uzel A, Buyukyilmaz T, Kayalioglu M, et al. Temperature rise during orthodontic bonding with various light-curing units—an in vitro study. Angle Orthod 2006;76(2):330−334. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0330:TRDOBW]2.0.CO;2.
  9. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Temperature rise induced by some light emitting diode and quartz−tungsten−halogen curing units. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113(1):96–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00181.x.
  10. Chirtoc M, Bicanic DD, Hitge ML, et al. Monitoring the polymerization process of acrylic resins. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8(3):259−264. PMID: 10348595.
  11. Hussey DL, Biagioni PA, Lamey PJ. Thermographic measurement of temperature change during resin composite polymerization in vivo. J Dent 1995;23(5):267−271. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)91149-h.
  12. Baldissara P, Catapano S, Scotti R. Clinical and histological evaluation of thermal injury thresholds in human teeth: a preliminary study. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24(11):791−801. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00566.x.
  13. Nakajima M, Arimoto A, Prasansuttiporn T, et al. Light transmission characteristics of dentine and resin composites with different thickness. J Dent 2012;40(Suppl. 2):e77−e82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.016.
  14. Kodonas K, Gogos C, Tziafas D. Effect of simulated pulpal microcirculation on intrapulpal temperature changes following application of heat on tooth surfaces. Int Endod J 2009;42(3):247−252. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01508.x.
  15. Al-Qudah AA, Mitchell CA, Biagioni PA, et al. Thermographic investigation of contemporary resin-containing dental materials. J Dent 2005;33(7):593−602. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.010.
  16. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: A systematic review. Dent Mater 2005;21(10):895−910. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.001.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.