The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2014 ) > List of Articles


Comparison of Linear Measurements and Analyses taken from Plaster Models and Three-dimensional Images

Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto, Matheus Coelho Bandéca, Mônica Barros Silva, Betina Grehs Porto, Thiago Soares Porto, Renésio Armindo Grehs, Ary dos Santos Pinto, Shilpa H Bhandi, Lourdes Aparecida Martins dos Santos-Pinto

Citation Information : Tonetto MR, Bandéca MC, Silva MB, Porto BG, Porto TS, Grehs RA, Pinto AD, Bhandi SH, Santos-Pinto LA. Comparison of Linear Measurements and Analyses taken from Plaster Models and Three-dimensional Images. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15 (6):681-687.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1599

Published Online: 01-12-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


How to cite this article

Porto BG, Porto TS, Silva MB, Grehs RA, dos Santos Pinto A, Bhandi SH, Tonetto MR, Bandéca MC, dos Santos-Pinto LAM. Comparison of Linear Measurements and Analyses taken from Plaster Models and Three-dimensional Images. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(6):681-687.

PDF Share
  1. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 2007;29(5):517-522.
  2. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 2009;36(1):36-41.
  3. Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times. Prog Orthod 2007;8(2):252-259.
  4. A new way of analyzing occlusion 3 dimensionally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005 Jul;128(1):128-132.
  5. Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:1093-1101.
  6. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83(5):382-390.
  7. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Ortho 2008;35(3):191-201.
  8. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975;68(5):554-563.
  9. Análise tridimensional da oclusão normal na população branca brasileira [tese de mestrado]. Araraquara: Faculdade de Odontologia da UNESP; 2004.
  10. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(3):346-352.
  11. Confiabilidade do uso de modelos digitais tridimensionais como exame auxiliar ao diagnóstico ortodôntico: um estudo piloto. 2007;12(1):84-93.
  12. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method. Eur J Orthod 2006 Apr;28(2):120-125.
  13. Digital diagnosis records in orthodontics. An overview. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006 Jan;11(1):E88-E93.
  14. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004 Jun;74(3):298-303.
  15. Digital models: a new diagnostic tool. J Clin Orthod 2001 Jun;35(6):386-387.
  16. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003 Jul;124(1):101-105.
  17. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;112(6):676-680.
  18. Use of an ultrahigh-speed scanner for constructing three-dimensional shapes of dentition and occlusion. J Prosth Dent 2000 Sep;84(3):345-352.
  19. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 Jun;129(6):794-803.
  20. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 2001 Sept;71(5):351-357.
  21. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003 Jun;73(3):301-306.
  22. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 Oct;130(4):485-491.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.