The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of Linear Measurements and Analyses taken from Plaster Models and Three-dimensional Images

Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto, Matheus Coelho Bandéca, Mônica Barros Silva, Betina Grehs Porto, Thiago Soares Porto, Renésio Armindo Grehs, Ary dos Santos Pinto, Lourdes Aparecida Martins dos Santos-Pinto

Citation Information : Tonetto MR, Bandéca MC, Silva MB, Porto BG, Porto TS, Grehs RA, Pinto AD, Santos-Pinto LA. Comparison of Linear Measurements and Analyses taken from Plaster Models and Three-dimensional Images. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15 (6):681-687.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1599

Published Online: 01-03-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Porto BG, Porto TS, Silva MB, Grehs RA, dos Santos Pinto A, Bhandi SH, Tonetto MR, Bandéca MC, dos Santos-Pinto LAM. Comparison of Linear Measurements and Analyses taken from Plaster Models and Three-dimensional Images. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(6):681-687.


PDF Share
  1. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 2007;29(5):517-522.
  2. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 2009;36(1):36-41.
  3. Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times. Prog Orthod 2007;8(2):252-259.
  4. A new way of analyzing occlusion 3 dimensionally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005 Jul;128(1):128-132.
  5. Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:1093-1101.
  6. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83(5):382-390.
  7. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Ortho 2008;35(3):191-201.
  8. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975;68(5):554-563.
  9. Análise tridimensional da oclusão normal na população branca brasileira [tese de mestrado]. Araraquara: Faculdade de Odontologia da UNESP; 2004.
  10. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(3):346-352.
  11. Confiabilidade do uso de modelos digitais tridimensionais como exame auxiliar ao diagnóstico ortodôntico: um estudo piloto. 2007;12(1):84-93.
  12. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method. Eur J Orthod 2006 Apr;28(2):120-125.
  13. Digital diagnosis records in orthodontics. An overview. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006 Jan;11(1):E88-E93.
  14. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004 Jun;74(3):298-303.
  15. Digital models: a new diagnostic tool. J Clin Orthod 2001 Jun;35(6):386-387.
  16. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003 Jul;124(1):101-105.
  17. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;112(6):676-680.
  18. Use of an ultrahigh-speed scanner for constructing three-dimensional shapes of dentition and occlusion. J Prosth Dent 2000 Sep;84(3):345-352.
  19. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 Jun;129(6):794-803.
  20. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 2001 Sept;71(5):351-357.
  21. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003 Jun;73(3):301-306.
  22. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 Oct;130(4):485-491.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.